cohost - A less-toxic Twitter alternative?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Some bitching about social media platforms in general:
Chost | Archive ( content warning can't be opened )
View attachment 5192008

Bluesky is apparently racist against black devs, from a bystander Latino's point of view. As a bonus a commenter lightly chides the OP for using transwoman instead of trans woman:
Chost | Archive ( content warning can't be opened )
View attachment 5192013
If there's a chost with a content warning, you can still archive what's inside with ghostarchive.
 
Extremely late, but it seems like nobody cares about this piece of shit website, which goes to show just how insignificant it is.

They've apparently managed to get into better financial straits because their last "holy shit we're running out of money" announcement brought in a ton of new paypigs.


So I guess their strategy now is to e-beg every time they're running out of money, and people will keep paypigging because Twitter Man Bad (And Retarded).
 
The only time I've ever seen this piece of shit site mentioned was by Elliot No Dong Jones, scrolling through the comments on that post I see so many furries and other faggots that it doesn't surprise me either. Surprises me someone is willing to pay them to host their shitty website.
 
Extremely late, but it seems like nobody cares about this piece of shit website, which goes to show just how insignificant it is.
I think it's harder and easier at the same time to find things. You have to go out of your way to look for deviant tags like #pregnancy kink and you'll find lots of content that's all pretty much the same without any being particularly lulzworthy enough to post here. User-user interaction is also a lot more stifled than Twitter or Tumblr.
 
might be old news, but there is a post discussing how eevee from the glitchedpuppet thread, pedophile zoo with a long history of sexualising minors, is friends with one of the founders of cohost, who themselves are a pedo into cub

1693444717625.png

1693444734763.png


for a good intro as to who these people are and what the deal with their degeneracy is this youtube series goes into it, good watch
 
might be old news, but there is a post discussing how eevee from the glitchedpuppet thread, pedophile zoo with a long history of sexualising minors, is friends with one of the founders of cohost, who themselves are a pedo into cub
Kaara / allthefoxes already has his own thread and it was discussed here when he was hired by the cohosters. But the information about cohost being troon and pedo guards for eevee hasn't been posted before.

It's good to see other people recognizing that this isn't exactly a good look for cohost, which is already saying "we are banning lolishota now but miiiight unban it later."

Tbh the other three are likely pedos who get off on abusing children too.
 
ahahaha. note: the quoted parts are not my words nor formatting, it's literally copy-pasted from their site. it's shitpost art!

> What's Going On With Eggbux
to avoid going into too much detail: I am disabled and experienced related health issues that prevented me from working at even half-pace for much of the back-half of last year
> cohost stops being some of our full-time jobs
the rest of us would have to get other jobs to pay rent and like. have you seen the job market?? it’s not great

So cohost isn't making money, they're hiring 4 staff full time. Two of these are developers and apparently, two full time developers isn't enough to both maintain the site and add a feature. Why you ask? Well one of them is disabled and did jack shit for 6 months.
So what do????
Well they could not hire 4 people and instead hire one but omg the job market don't do that to us!!!

I almost hope they manage to limp along so we get another incredible update like this to enjoy.

edit; oh my fucking god
as an ostensibly for-profit entity, “please give us money in exchange for no long-term guarantee of anything” is not a proposition we think we can use to raise the ~$400,000 a year we need to keep the lights on for long.
360k of the 400k is spent on wages. 90,000 a year! for a disabled retard that didn't work half the year!
1710313820730.png
 
Last edited:
source (a)

Where's all that gravedancing now about how Musk was going to run X into the ground with advertiser money leaving?
  • someone actually expresses interest here (we are not shopping ourselves around but we're also somewhat open to offers. e-mail us if you’ve got one.)
  • we receive an offer that prevents mixing or sale of user data, or any other changes that would go against our ethical red lines.
null should buy cohost (through a proxy)
 
360k of 400k went into their wages. That's incredible. One one hand, hats off for milking the VC morons, on the other, this is the least elegant and sophisticated way to do this. They are litterally bragging to the public they embezzled 90% of the funds that were supposed to run the website.

Any normal company would fire that retard who did no work for 6 months, sucking money, but I have a feeling cohost is entirely funded by VC money, so cohost founders give zero fucks (it's not their money and they are complicit in pulling it out from cohost in the same way). The VCs that gave them the money are also retarded 1) for putting money in this shitshow of a website and 2) for not being able to eradicate these lazy commie fucks and take over the company. Cohost as an idea is not great, but not terrible either, so if it was staffed with competent developers it could work as a niche alternative social medium. And probably be out of the red too.

anti software software club is a not-for-profit software company that hates the software industry. we’re working on cohost.
Hell yeah if I were funneling 90% of my company budget it too would not have any profits. ASSC is registered in Seattle, this seems to match the general lefty idea hotspot in the USA
 
Some internet person analyzed cohost's financial updates.

I'm too retarded to make heads or tails of it, but some of the comments are funny:
I understand people have health issues, but again, this is a combination of oversharing personal details and extreme mismanagement. Even with a team this small, you have got to have a backup plan if someone is out of commission. More than one person needs to be able to do these reports. And as of the time I am writing this, there's still not a backup person to write these reports.
So it's at this point I want to just flat out say this: I truly believe that they deliberately picked financial updates to push out when the numbers looked their best, then went silent again until they either had more decent numbers or were in such bad shape they couldn't avoid it anymore. Can I prove that? No. Do I believe it? Absolutely. Because they seemed to be able to get updates out real snappy when the numbers were better than average. Otherwise we just seem to get them when things are so bad they can't put off telling people anymore. And I think the next update might highlight that as well.
But the key part of this section is: they have no idea where their funder is.

Their only source of funding is missing. They can't contact them, and haven't been in contact with them for over a month. I have no idea if they have mutual friends who could have contacted them, I have no idea if they've done any kind of wellness check, but what we know is that their funder and long time friend is totally missing, not possible to contact, and they aren't sure whether they're even alive or dead. Unlike the last no-payroll scare, there isn't a quick solution to getting more money in the bank.
:story:
 
I just wanted to add to my previous post - ASSC is a not-for-profit company which means their primary goal is not making profit (as the name states). But they are literally burning money on everything but running the website. They would have more time left if they fired all people from that company and set the hosting bill to be automatically paid. The 90% going to their pockets that I mentioned could be due to their greed/stupidity but if the money was given with a purpose (eg. to run the "website") then a good lawyer could make this an actual embezzlement case.

I really want to know what happened to the founder. Maybe he saw what dorks they are and blocked their number. If I gave $400k of VC funding to digital bums who spent most of it on their personal expenses, I'd skip town out of shame too.
 
360k of 400k went into their wages. That's incredible. One one hand, hats off for milking the VC morons, on the other, this is the least elegant and sophisticated way to do this. They are litterally bragging to the public they embezzled 90% of the funds that were supposed to run the website.
They can spin it to their pinko userbase as 'ensuring a living wage' and bingo bongo.

The founder question is reallllll good.
 
I'm too retarded to make heads or tails of it
Basically the post talks about how Cohost's financial numbers are inconsistent and all over the place, they sometimes just don't publish financial reports and their team is so dysfunctional they can't have conversations about reassigning important tasks from the tard who literally can't work for half a year (and these are important tasks like implementing features that are supposed to make them finally be profitable).

In other words what you would expect from a site that has a lolcow thread on the Kiwi Farms. :story:
 
Basically the post talks about how Cohost's financial numbers are inconsistent and all over the place, they sometimes just don't publish financial reports
Yeah, I meant that I couldn't follow the napkin math in the post, though cohost isn't making it easy to begin with. I noticed he estimates they're about a million in debt, though.
their team is so dysfunctional they can't have conversations about reassigning important tasks from the tard who literally can't work for half a year (and these are important tasks like implementing features that are supposed to make them finally be profitable).
Gotta say it's way funnier from a safe distance.
 
Back