#Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Its really just sad that you can get away with that kayfabe shit in the farms.

You saw the situation with Preston emerging, you encouraged Vikki & Dean, then you carefully inserted yourself into the conversation by going on their stream and carefully parsing every word you said to hide behind trademark defense speech while you let them walk over the cliff. When you started going on stream with them, you were not concerned about the damage they did to that coin scam Dynamite Comics was running in your name or what comicsgate was thinking about it.

If you were honest, you would have said that you have done more than enough for them by having your own attorney file the briefs first and creating a situation where Vikki/Dean can slipstream along in your legal wake. That its not your responsibility that they can't even come up with the little money it takes to pay an attorney to crib your attorney's notes and say "me too". That the case will probably end on a jurisdictional argument and be over before they need serious legal representation beyond the abilities of free treehouse attorneys like Spectre. So why waste money on people who don't need it?

As in most comments by you, the more interesting question is who your comment is intended to grift. Because everything is always about grifting someone. Is the kayfabe for your fans & minions on the farms? Or is it meant to reinforce your legal narrative in court that you have nothing to do with those other people? Or are you just fucking with people again to prove how smart you are to yourself again? I get the problem of being the biggest fish in a shallow gene pool, but if your going to respond here come up with stories that are least entertaining or plausible. Don't treat the farms as if they were the people on your streams.
This is a hurricane of autism. There's no conspiracy.

"Do you owe it to Dean and Vikki to help them financially?"

No.

"Does ComicsGate?"

No.

"Could ComicsGate GoFundMe a legal warchest for Dean and Vikki anyhow?"

No, I don't think I could make that argument to my audience, especially after past legal efforts for others flopped.

Everything else you mentioned, ie: The case will probably be dismissed, they can crib my lawyers notes, etc, are beside the point as to why I can't or won't give them money. They're excuses.

That's kayfabe to you, eh?
 
This is a hurricane of autism. There's no conspiracy.

"Do you owe it to Dean and Vikki to help them financially?"

No.

"Does ComicsGate?"

No.

"Could ComicsGate GoFundMe a legal warchest for Dean and Vikki anyhow?"

No, I don't think I could make that argument to my audience, especially after past legal efforts for others flopped.

Everything else you mentioned, ie: The case will probably be dismissed, they can crib my lawyers notes, etc, are beside the point as to why I can't or won't give them money. They're excuses.

That's kayfabe to you, eh?
Just wondering why they think you are responsible for their legal troubles?
 
Rackets? Only if you want to lose.
Again, my answer was concerning who could potentially be Dean's "sugar daddy" in the/a lawsuit. Not his lawyer. Rackets has money. I don't think that's in dispute. He also isn't gonna have any love for PP or JL.

It's just a hypothetical. I doubt it would happen, but it's not a completely crazy idea when you examine it closely.

Now you might ask yourself, who cares if Sketch is pissed? Sketch is the Krysten Sinema of ComicsGate.
I appreciate and understand that analogy. Thanks. Went to Sinema's house a long time for some political bullshit when she was running for State Senate.

Phenomenal rack. Kinda stupid and bitchy though. I think I saw some articles recently where she's in hot water with her own party these days.
 
Again, my answer was concerning who could potentially be Dean's "sugar daddy" in the/a lawsuit. Not his lawyer. Rackets has money. I don't think that's in dispute. He also isn't gonna have any love for PP or JL.

It's just a hypothetical. I doubt it would happen, but it's not a completely crazy idea when you examine it closely.


I appreciate and understand that analogy. Thanks. Went to Sinema's house a long time for some political bullshit when she was running for State Senate.

Phenomenal rack. Kinda stupid and bitchy though. I think I saw some articles recently where she's in hot water with her own party these days.
Rackets doesn’t seem to like V&D because of the TUG stuff.
 
Again, my answer was concerning who could potentially be Dean's "sugar daddy" in the/a lawsuit. Not his lawyer. Rackets has money. I don't think that's in dispute. He also isn't gonna have any love for PP or JL.

It's just a hypothetical. I doubt it would happen, but it's not a completely crazy idea when you examine it closely.

Rackets doesn't strike me as generous with his money. Very much so with other people, Weebs for example, but not with his own.

Looking for grifters to help people because it's the right thing to do is a lost cause.

I appreciate and understand that analogy. Thanks. Went to Sinema's house a long time for some political bullshit when she was running for State Senate.

Phenomenal rack. Kinda stupid and bitchy though. I think I saw some articles recently where she's in hot water with her own party these days.

Wow. She's definitely got that hot bitch look down.

Blitzer-Arizona-Primary.jpg


You better believe behind the 5'4" little lady is a dozen cowering grown ass men.


Rackets doesn’t seem to like V&D because of the TUG stuff.

And doesn't that speak volumes about Nick? They TUG 'stuff' is them exposing Tug's cat fishing Vicstans and Gators with his ham beast wife.
 
Rackets doesn’t seem to like V&D because of the TUG stuff.
I've heard conflicting views on how he might feel about things now.

Some people have argued that Rackets was throwing shade on D&V when he mentioned on his show that some people who talk to him opined that "D&V deserve it." TUG almost certainly had to be one of those people. I'd put money on it. Others have presented an alternate view that he's actually obliquely telling TUG & Co. to grow the fuck up. The latter theory emanates from the fact he actually went in pretty hard on Poulter and Lamont.

There's a video clip of this, but I can't seem to find it ATM.

Personally, I just can't wrap my head around the idea of somebody being gleeful that anybody was sued by those two faggots. Especially considering the subject matter of the suit. People have beef with other people on the Internet all the time, but basic human decency can and should override one's bias under the right circumstances.

Rackets doesn't strike me as generous with his money. Very much so with other people, Weebs for example, but not with his own.
I just wanted to run it up the flag pole and see who salutes. I'm guessing nobody. I shall make a note of that.

Wow. She's definitely got that hot bitch look down.
She's one of the better looking (D) women, IMO. I mean, what are your other options? Feinstein? Pelosi? Horse-faced Cortez?

And doesn't that speak volumes about Nick? They TUG 'stuff' is them exposing Tug's cat fishing Vicstans and Gators with his ham beast wife.
You were just talking about "lost causes." Rekieta makes 67,432 Ron Toye cuck jokes, but TUG's ham beast wife is all over the place flirting with guys on the Internet and soliciting dick pics. All with the knowledge of TUG. Rekieta still goes on streams with TUG.

It is what it is. Maybe he doesn't know. Maybe he does, but doesn't give a shit. I dunno. Don't particularly care, either.

In complete fairness to Rekieta, he did eventually (and recently) disavow Ethan Ralph (who for the purposes of this thread is either the "bad Ethan" or the "worst Ethan").
 
I've heard conflicting views on how he might feel about things now.

Some people have argued that Rackets was throwing shade on D&V when he mentioned on his show that some people who talk to him opined that "D&V deserve it." TUG almost certainly had to be one of those people. I'd put money on it. Others have presented an alternate view that he's actually obliquely telling TUG & Co. to grow the fuck up. The latter theory emanates from the fact he actually went in pretty hard on Poulter and Lamont.

There's a video clip of this, but I can't seem to find it ATM.

Personally, I just can't wrap my head around the idea of somebody being gleeful that anybody was sued by those two faggots. Especially considering the subject matter of the suit. People have beef with other people on the Internet all the time, but basic human decency can and should override one's bias under the right circumstances.


I just wanted to run it up the flag pole and see who salutes. I'm guessing nobody. I shall make a note of that.


She's one of the better looking (D) women, IMO. I mean, what are your other options? Feinstein? Pelosi? Horse-faced Cortez?


You were just talking about "lost causes." Rekieta makes 67,432 Ron Toye cuck jokes, but TUG's ham beast wife is all over the place flirting with guys on the Internet and soliciting dick pics. All with the knowledge of TUG. Rekieta still goes on streams with TUG.

It is what it is. Maybe he doesn't know. Maybe he does, but doesn't give a shit. I dunno. Don't particularly care, either.

In complete fairness to Rekieta, he did eventually (and recently) disavow Ethan Ralph (who for the purposes of this thread is either the "bad Ethan" or the "worst Ethan").
I watched Rekieta do a livestream about the case, in which he expressed absolute disgust for Poulter (perfectly warranted by all factors) and a note of schadenfreude for Dean (which is subjective and based on whether or not Dean and Vikki have "gone after" one of his friends. )

I guess Nick considers TUG to be a friend, and that's that.

But I don't think Nick was "gleeful" about it. It was something slightly less than, "sucks for you, dude."

My feeling about Vikki and Dean is that as long as they're being honest and fair, I've got no problem with them criticizing me or anyone else. I've mostly seen them be fair, except for RibbitCoin, which required me to step in and explain things publicly. I wasn't paying too much attention to them until the last year or so, so I missed most of their TUG videos.
 
I watched Rekieta do a livestream about the case, in which he expressed absolute disgust for Poulter (perfectly warranted by all factors) and a note of schadenfreude for Dean (which is subjective and based on whether or not Dean and Vikki have "gone after" one of his friends. )
Agreed.

But I don't think Nick was "gleeful" about it.
Neither do I. That's why it's probably hard to get a read. Other people have expressed glee though. TUG would be one of them.
 
The seer unadulterated amount of special needs, have to wear a helmet while eating with a spork autism on display here is staggering. I am only going to address this once so don't bother quoting me expecting a reply.

Its really just sad that you can get away with that kayfabe shit in the farms.

You saw the situation with Preston emerging, you encouraged Vikki & Dean, then you carefully inserted yourself into the conversation by going on their stream and carefully parsing every word you said to hide behind trademark defense speech while you let them walk over the cliff. When you started going on stream with them, you were not concerned about the damage they did to that coin scam Dynamite Comics was running in your name or what comicsgate was thinking about it.

If you were honest, you would have said that you have done more than enough for them by having your own attorney file the briefs first and creating a situation where Vikki/Dean can slipstream along in your legal wake. That its not your responsibility that they can't even come up with the little money it takes to pay an attorney to crib your attorney's notes and say "me too". That the case will probably end on a jurisdictional argument and be over before they need serious legal representation beyond the abilities of free treehouse attorneys like Spectre. So why waste money on people who don't need it?

As in most comments by you, the more interesting question is who your comment is intended to grift. Because everything is always about grifting someone. Is the kayfabe for your fans & minions on the farms? Or is it meant to reinforce your legal narrative in court that you have nothing to do with those other people? Or are you just fucking with people again to prove how smart you are to yourself again? I get the problem of being the biggest fish in a shallow gene pool, but if your going to respond here come up with stories that are least entertaining or plausible. Don't treat the farms as if they were the people on your streams.

This is utter horseshit and a complete rewriting of past events.

Ethan never "encouraged" us to do anything. DA Talks and I aren't exactly buddies with EVS. We have had minimal contact that has consisted of my negotiating with EVS regarding the Ribbit coin stream and DM'ing a streamyard link. We aren't on each others Christmas Card lists. You're sounding just like Poulter and his sycophants and certain members of War Campaign, who believe that I've been in Ethan's pocket and have some sort of controlled opposition for EVS from the get go.

You've read the filings. You're all over the LOLsuit thread. I know it didn't slip your notice that Poulter is trying to hang us on shit we are alleged to have said before EVS was on stream with us. Our interest and Ethan's don't intersect except for the fact that all three of us would like to see Poulter ground into the legal dirt vis-à-vis this case, hence, it would be a conflict of interest for Ethan to fund either of our legal expenses.

And in case it slipped anyone else's notice DA and I are barely tolerated by ComicsGate. People are told in backrooms not to associate with us. CG isn't gonna suddenly jump in to help us even if EVS asked it of them.

Moving on:

Again, my answer was concerning who could potentially be Dean's "sugar daddy" in the/a lawsuit. Not his lawyer. Rackets has money. I don't think that's in dispute. He also isn't gonna have any love for PP or JL.

It's just a hypothetical. I doubt it would happen, but it's not a completely crazy idea when you examine it closely.


I appreciate and understand that analogy. Thanks. Went to Sinema's house a long time for some political bullshit when she was running for State Senate.

Phenomenal rack. Kinda stupid and bitchy though. I think I saw some articles recently where she's in hot water with her own party these days.

I've heard conflicting views on how he might feel about things now.

Some people have argued that Rackets was throwing shade on D&V when he mentioned on his show that some people who talk to him opined that "D&V deserve it." TUG almost certainly had to be one of those people. I'd put money on it. Others have presented an alternate view that he's actually obliquely telling TUG & Co. to grow the fuck up. The latter theory emanates from the fact he actually went in pretty hard on Poulter and Lamont.

There's a video clip of this, but I can't seem to find it ATM.

Personally, I just can't wrap my head around the idea of somebody being gleeful that anybody was sued by those two faggots. Especially considering the subject matter of the suit. People have beef with other people on the Internet all the time, but basic human decency can and should override one's bias under the right circumstances.


I just wanted to run it up the flag pole and see who salutes. I'm guessing nobody. I shall make a note of that.


She's one of the better looking (D) women, IMO. I mean, what are your other options? Feinstein? Pelosi? Horse-faced Cortez?


You were just talking about "lost causes." Rekieta makes 67,432 Ron Toye cuck jokes, but TUG's ham beast wife is all over the place flirting with guys on the Internet and soliciting dick pics. All with the knowledge of TUG. Rekieta still goes on streams with TUG.

It is what it is. Maybe he doesn't know. Maybe he does, but doesn't give a shit. I dunno. Don't particularly care, either.

In complete fairness to Rekieta, he did eventually (and recently) disavow Ethan Ralph (who for the purposes of this thread is either the "bad Ethan" or the "worst Ethan").

Why on God's blue planet would we expect any help from Rackets? We don't even know him. He doesn't know us. He supposed to be all altruistic just because? He is friends with TUG and Yellow Flash who hate us with a passion. TUG's hatred of me extended to doxing me after he grifted backing for his second book on the lies he told about both me and SJW Captain America, ffs. DA Talks is hated by both Yellow Flash and TUG because he exposed their gay-ops during Weeb Wars and you think their good buddy Nick is just gonna turn his back on them, their subscribers, and potential superchats to help us? Ridiculous.

Rackets doesn’t seem to like V&D because of the TUG stuff.

Not just TUG. You obviously haven't seen DA Talk's Yellow Flash video.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for clearing this up Vikki, this whole "Rackets comes to save the day" stuff was getting pretty delusional and gay. I don't think Rackets is a bad guy, but that's a long stretch to think that he would be DA Talks "sugar daddy" out of the goodness of his heart.
 
My feeling about Vikki and Dean is that as long as they're being honest and fair, I've got no problem with them criticizing me or anyone else. I've mostly seen them be fair, except for RibbitCoin, which required me to step in and explain things publicly. I wasn't paying too much attention to them until the last year or so, so I missed most of their TUG videos.
You got a problem whenever someone criticizes you and a big problem when that criticism has merit. You don't know shit about shit if it's outside comics and you don't stand for shit except yourself. Since we're talking shit, has it yet entered into your brain how having a no-talent alcoholic as your mascot and brand rep is a bad idea? Before Ethereum, your NFT was Cecil and cheap tampos. As long as it makes money, who cares. Never change Ethan, I'm looking forward to the Cecil closeout spectacular!

Good to see you're back after your cancer scare. Not having every post on this thread lovingly praising your self-serving efforts must be taxing. I was worried you might actually spend more than a week without doing damage control over here lol.
 
You got a problem whenever someone criticizes you and a big problem when that criticism has merit.
I'm not gonna pretend to know how Ethan acts off-site, but I just wanna say I think he's comported himself on KF better than just about any other e-celebrity I know. He seems fully cognizant this is a shit-flinging forum where nobody is obligated to be nice to him. I can respect that.

I think he's full of shit sometimes, but that's an entirely different analysis.

Before anybody says "yeah, but...", please take a step outside this thread and check out the rest of the site. Usually when somebody joins their own thread (and I think by now we've resolved this is like 90% Ethan's thread at this point), it often ends in abject disaster for that person and they run away like a little bitch never to come back.

Hell, he even doubled down on DAMEGANG after we made fun of him for it, and said he was gonna boost it further to own the Farms. And it kinda worked. I don't think it would have hit the numbers it did if he didn't boost it.

notmadamazed.gif

Just food for thought. We now return you to your slapfight in progress.
 
We live in dark times Kiwis. Forsaken by Smug Frieza. Turned into the dark gay frog wilderness.

Since he's been brought up and is always floating on the Comicsgate, we start with Nick Reikata. Nick's been in trouble. He got strikes on his channel for Community Guidelines violation.


Nick has been cute about Trumpshit. He's tried to have his cake and eat it too. He has stated he does not believe the election was stolen, he thinks that it was fair and legit. Biden won. But he's also platformed other people saying something else.


Furious over Youtube striking him for trying to have his cake and eat it too, he ranted about how stupid he thinks supporting Trump voter fraud is and Youtube censoring him is. But......


Rackets has known what he was doing. And if he was as stupid as a certain bearded sasquatch, I don't know he wouldn't have grifted the QAnon types.

For anyone not caught up, Dean and Vicki did a stream Mike, his NFTs, and how he fucked up launching them.


Doug and Mike have essentially been engaging in the real world equivalent of selling knock off watches and purses to tourists. Watching as Mike and Doug sell the equivalent of bland thumbnails for Monopoly money has given me plenty of yucks.

s6XMr0-iatxrm08q8HQIXD71zLxDTxzNq6gfnE4BgDt4bm9rcoKYft3-7Dj-gpTBkiTJ8PSSIuerLC1Hg7E9mlJ4I88gyHWv2ZoHkpk=w600
FBUulXNXIAE4R3O.jpg


Mike wasted no time in 'dunking' on @FROG with his success. Thanks for the screen cap go to @Newman's Own

1634183787711-png.2623928



Before you feel bad for Frog, Ethan had called this a disgusting scam (it's stupid, not a scam as defined by CG) and was EFAPing the Farms and Vikki/Dean. Ethan admits he doesn't really know about NFTs and after Mike makes his boast gets kindof introspective. He is truly lost and can someone, anyone explain the catch to him? How did the guy make a quarter appear out his ear!

1634183141229-png.2623894


He was changing into a shirt Mike. Not turning off his camera to hide his tears that your kids would actually have something to eat this month.

This weird mixture of seethe, confusion, and seriousness continued to flow.

Take @NasserRabadi13 sperg outs.


The whiny millennial has frequently tried to joke that Boyette tore his brain. But if anyone is tearing anything it's this kid. Between lacking a sense of humor at just how ridiculous the whole thing is, repeating approved Gator lines calling them hypocrites (They said they want to be serious artists blah blah), and admitting he has no fucking clue how NFT's work.

Let's start with the boring material. Every time CG is called a scam, Gators respond that they in fact deliver a product. Sometimes. (Detective Dead). However, Doug and Mike are delivering a string of 1s and 0s. This is not a scam, it is incredibly stupid and slimy though. How long will it be before the rubes figure out the King is Without clothes? Who cares! Let's all enjoy as the one thing for sure is Mike Miller will always fuck something up.

Doug Tennapel has stayed busy since he's managed to get blacklisted on YT. He was hosted on a channel called the Riot and the Dance. It's mostly boring. However, they get him talking about frogs at the 21:00 minute mark.


Not really sure anyone would care but it might be memeable.
 
I had a really great time at the Indian Wells tennis tournament this week. The field is so open without Federer, Nadal, or Djokovic playing. Did I miss anything?

View attachment 2633080
Holy shit! You trooned out!

And you look better than most troons in that pic, I suppose. My compliments to your surgeon. I mean, they didn't have much to work with.

:smug:

Nick has been cute about Trumpshit. He's tried to have his cake and eat it too. He has stated he does not believe the election was stolen, he thinks that it was fair and legit. Biden won. But he's also platformed other people saying something else.
Nick is gonna end up slumming it over on Dlive with Ethan Ralph if he doesn't walk on eggshells regarding anything Trump or COVID related. The issue he's facing is that he probably does believe Biden legitimately won, but many of his insane followers don't want to hear that. I tuned in briefly last night, and the upvote/downvote ratio was all over the place, depending on how conciliatory he was acting towards Biden.

We can debate endlessly whether Youtube is being "fair," but the issue here is that Susan gives exactly zero fucks, and it's Susan's kingdom. I know of "get woke, go broke," but I also think on some platforms now there's also "get too based, get erased."

Same reason I mentioned to @FROG that he should tell Jon Malin to cool his jets with his lame firearm collection. I wasn't trying to be an asshole to EVS by mentioning that. It's legitimately sage advice he should take up. I'm not cheering for anybody to get booted from Youtube.
 
Last edited:
Holy shit! You trooned out!

And you look better than most troons in that pic, I suppose. My compliments to your surgeon. I mean, they didn't have much to work with.

:smug:


Nick is gonna end up slumming it over on Dlive with Ethan Ralph if he doesn't walk on eggshells regarding anything Trump or COVID related. The issue he's facing is that he probably does believe Biden legitimately won, but many of his insane followers don't want to hear that. I tuned in briefly last night, and the upvote/downvote ratio was all over the place, depending on how conciliatory he was acting towards Biden.

We can debate endlessly whether Youtube is being "fair," but the issue here is that Susan gives exactly zero fucks, and it's Susan's kingdom. I know of "get woke, go broke," but I also think on some platforms now there's also "get too based, get erased."

Same reason I mentioned to @FROG that he should tell Jon Malin to cool his jets with his lame firearm collection. I wasn't trying to be an asshole to EVS by mentioning that. It's legitimately sage advice he should take up. I'm not cheering for anybody to get booted from Youtube.

I've said the same. More, he's had both himself and others on stream 'question' the results.

He's not gotten hit yet. I credit that to not having people and streaming videos like Nick did. I think one of the strikes was for streaming some CPAC.

I'd hit troon Jon all day long, that's for sure...

And now I need to go.
 
Back
Top Bottom