Newman's Own
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2020
I read that claim here. Search the word "puppet" in this thread over the last week and you'll see what I mean. My understanding is that Hutt said he was following orders and Ernst has been responsible for most if not all the retarded things Hutt has done on his channel the last three years. Am I getting that wrong?I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that Hut "gave control of his channel" to Ernst or that he was "creating all of Hut's content". I don't think anyone, even Hut, is making this claim.
Sharing a few videos with Hutt is not a gay op. It's just sharing videos. The element of "control" is the only thing that makes this narrative interesting or a gay op.
When has hut ever "had the evidence" and not sperged out about it on is channel non-stop?Hut says he has much more evidence of deeper involvement and I suspect he's be able to give us a clearer picture of exactly how many videos Ernst edited and scripted for him. When he comes out of hiding, he may let more shit spill. Until then, it's all speculation.
Strange he should go silent at the precise moment he could release his receipts and lay waste to his perceived enemies. (if only in his own mind)
Speculation is right.
Exactly.it would probably be easier to get an accurate number by going to Hut's channel and counting up the videos that meet the criteria of "about CG and competently edited" but that's not possible since Hut went DFE on a lot of the anti-CG stuff.
Instead, let's take Hutt's word for it. He wouldn't lie. Right?
Ethan with his admittedly very impressive charisma couldn't keep his retard from going off the reservation frequently and embarrassingly.Dude, how much charisma and secret genius intellect do you honestly think it takes to manipulate a friendless retard?
Spergs are like fire hoses. If you point them at a target it gets soaked but if you don't maintain tight control over it all Hell breaks lose.
The dumber the sperg the harder they are to control. Liam is a good example. While stupid he wasn't Sketch stupid and he was easy to manipulate for years until he was no longer useful. But Sketch has been beyond anyone's control.
Hutt is much more like Sketch than like Liam. Wrangling full on tards is much harder than wrangling garden variety dumbies.
I don't have any theories about Hutt like that. He's totally unreliable which is why I don't take his word that since Doug sent him some video Doug was actually in charge the whole time.Any theory you have about this situation that requires a modicum of cunning, guile, or cleverness on Hut's part can probably be safely discarded.
Weren't all of these videos just clips of Frog contradicting himself?
Sure, I can see Doug helping Hutt out with his videos when asked or even sending Hutt unsolicited videos if he saw something Frog was doing that pissed him off.The way it looks to me is that Doug would pre slice and dice the clips and maybe an outline of talking points, but I don't buy for a minute this was thrust upon Christopher. I think Christopher probably asked for help and Doug not being a fan of Frog & Co. obliged perhaps using the opportunity to seed speculation or at least to chip away at the edges of CG until something was ripe for an exposé.
Doing this without advertising it isn't a "gay op". It's just one YouTuber helping another YouTuber rail against a third YouTuber who regularly takes shots at both of them. That's just an internet slap fight. It's literally happening everywhere all the time. All parties involved should be laughed at.
But I don't see a gay op there unless Doug was coordinating some plot behind the scenes. That's what Hutt was claiming wasn't it?
I'm having trouble taking the retards word on it since he went dark rather than dropping the receipts. Is that unreasonable?
Retards make up elaborate stories all the time.Then you said he could have made up this elaborate story, with pics and all, because his crowd funder failed. Which is it? Retard or Doug sabotager, it can't be both.
"I was just following orders" and "it's all Doug's fault, buy my book" doesn't strike me as that elaborate. I know four year olds who play those cards. The story gets elaborate when they have to back up the claim.
We could ask Hutt to back up his story but suddenly he doesn't want to share with the group for the first time ever.
Probably a coincidence. LOL. We should just take him at his word.
