#Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Mister Dongs said:
I don't feel bad for Warren Ellis because it's his fault most of these worthless fucks ever found a door into comics in the first place.


View attachment 1381452View attachment 1381456

Edit: Jennifer de Guzman weighs in

View attachment 1381817

Click to expand...
I don't feel bad for Warren Ellis at all. Is he a groomer? No. He went after women over the age of 18. Consenting adults.
What gets me is he opened the "comics gate" to these internet hoes through his pants.
Is it weird for him to use his position as a prominent writer to lure dumb hoes into bed? Yeah it's a shitty thing to do. He used a position of stardom and power to get women to trust him so he could take advantage of them. A lot of athletes and musicians do that too though.
I guess if you lay down with dangerhair SJW's it comes back to bite you in the ass. Sending sexual messages to women 20 years younger than you in comics and writing is always going to get you canceled because the medium is controlled by leftist radicals.
It's not that weird for a 40 year old guy to hit on a 22 year old woman. Based on the pretty weak evidence presented on twitter he sent some inappropriate emails and DM's to adult women.

At least we can trust in our boy Ethan Van Sciver. He may be a gaping asshole but he's -our- asshole. One of -us-. And he's not about to get #meetoo'ed. Dude has got to be laughing his ass off right now.
 
When a lib thot says she's looking for an "older" man she means a "richer" man that doesn't have the energy to trade up 6 months in.

Also, as far as I know Bluebeard means you murder each wife before going on to the next. Is this another word the SJWs are changing? Why don't they just invent new words instead of changing established words?




EDVS calling Pan a faggot is the most reasonable thing he's said in months.
 
Screenshot_20200616-204653_Samsung Internet.jpg

archive.is

🌮 Don Cardenas 🌮 on Twitter: "Here is an updated list of people who…

archived 17 Jun 2020 00:44:15 UTC
archive.is archive.is

Tim Doyle is on the "list" of sex pests in comics. Lmao. Wooooooo. Shit finna get funny as fuck.

I saw Brandon Graham listed here and had to do some digging to remember why. His only crime was fucking troons and posting tranny porno on twitter. He even drew a comic to defend himself.

Long as fuck
1528130709897.jpg
1528130838204.jpg
1528130778175.jpg
1528130900007.jpg
 
FROG said:
SJWs aren't "people."


Thank you! Thank you!
Click to expand...

Good work on that live stream on Oz's channel. You proved yourself marginally more intelligent than the exceptionally retarded Pan.

Still it was hilarious listening to him trigger the fuck out of you while you feigned outrage over WarCampaign doing things they did for you and with your encouragement just the month before.

I guess it's only "evil" when it's done to people you like.

EDIT: Also this.

1592359257825.png
 
Last edited:
@Analog Devolved

Is this the Broken Staircase list 2.0 but for comics? If so, the great purge is coming.


NasserRabadi13 said:
I can't believe they put Julius Schwartz on that list. He died at 88 in 2004. Why wait 16 years after the man dies? Did any of these people even know him anyways?
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter to "Radicals", if they could, they would dig up Stan Lee's corpse and put it on trial for "crimes against personhood" (wrong think)
 
SaidNoOneEver said:
Frog livestream about to start, featuring Cecil's triumphant return



Liam decides to compete with a live Vestige review!

Click to expand...

Liam must be so emotionally triggered by my simple post that he showed his sample pages for the Xenotype book and wanted to tell people it has a bright future (we'll see about that one, Orangeman. You talk about making choices that is economically viable, but jumping into a video game development when no one's ever read your book and commissioning more work for future Xenotype stories isn't exactly thinking about it in economics terms. You still have no market research on your total audience size). Then, he proceeds to be the most boring guy ever by reading Vestige live. Liam's always been uninteresting to begin with because he's such a downer, he was only noticed because his stream was where shit was blowing up. His chat's filled with WC guys.

Ethan on the other hand, declared Liam's position and stance by virtue of guilt by association since Liam started streaming at the same time and he's reviewing Vestige. It's over for Liam. He's in WC's camp now.

Also, this was hilarious:

wellreadsimp.PNG

Well Read Simp 1 needs to throw money at daddy for failing to defend and not sucking his dick properly.
 
CapeKnight said:
Liam must be so emotionally triggered by my simple post that he showed his sample pages for the Xenotype book and wanted to tell people it has a bright future (we'll see about that one, Orangeman. You talk about making choices that is economically viable, but jumping into a video game development when no one's ever read your book and commissioning more work for future Xenotype stories isn't exactly thinking about it in economics terms. You still have no market research on your total audience size). Then, he proceeds to be the most boring guy ever by reading Vestige live. Liam's always been uninteresting to begin with because he's such a downer, he was only noticed because his stream was where shit was blowing up. His chat's filled with WC guys.

Ethan on the other hand, declared Liam's position and stance by virtue of guilt by association since Liam started streaming at the same time and he's reviewing Vestige. It's over for Liam. He's in WC's camp now.

Also, this was hilarious:

View attachment 1382443

Well Read Simp 1 needs to throw money at daddy for failing to defend and not sucking his dick properly.
Click to expand...
Liam started his stream with 57 viewers. 40 mins later (now) he's down to 34. Warcampaign has apparently shrunk considerably.

Frog has 1,439
 
SaidNoOneEver said:
Liam started his stream with 57 viewers. 40 mins later (now) he's down to 34. Warcampaign has apparently shrunk considerably.

Frog has 1,439
Click to expand...
I noticed Destopolis, who popped in to troll Pan. The viewers that decreased were probably reporting back to Ethan or came to troll. Now that WC is disavowed, you can expect the rest of Ethan loyalists to take up the mantle of being his personal army. I've already seen people putting up more "CG" into their Twitter handle during the schism.

Edit: I noticed Anna joined the stream. Ethan said she had the right to monetize her sister's tragedy in Oz's stream, so I give no fucks about her at this point. I always thought she was adjacent to being a thot, but seeing Ethan double down and justify that, yeah, thanks for that clarification Ethan.

Anna is not an innocent little girl. She's an airhead bimbo who's just looking to cash in. I didn't think she was professional enough to do a cover, and I'll stand by that. To the peasants, she did cut the line because the way she got the cover was not based on merit, but based on subscriber count. I thought fighting the culture war involves the thinking that people needed merit to be where they are, but then again, I forgot Ethan Van Sciver is a fatfuck who can't write a good story either. Subscriber counts =/= merit.
 
Last edited:
CapeKnight said:
Anna is not an innocent little girl. She's an airhead bimbo who's just looking to cash in. I didn't think she was professional enough to do a cover, and I'll stand by that. To the peasants,
Click to expand...

Everyone in business is "looking to cash in". There is literally no other reason to do it. Who goes into business to lose money? Who is making anything and giving it away for free?


she did cut the line because the way she got the cover was not based on merit, but based on subscriber count. I thought fighting the culture war involves the thinking that people needed merit to be where they are, but then again, I forgot Ethan Van Sciver is a fatfuck who can't write a good story either. Subscriber counts =/= merit.
Click to expand...

Welcome to the real world where the ability to earn a profit = merit. Why do you think Deniro is in higher demand to star in movies than PanBoy? Draw-power matters.
 
SaidNoOneEver said:
Everyone in business is "looking to cash in". There is literally no other reason to do it. Who goes into business to lose money? Who is making anything and giving it away for free?




Welcome to the real world where the ability to earn a profit = merit. Why do you think Deniro is in higher demand to star in movies than PanBoy? Draw-power matters.
Click to expand...

There's a difference between conducting proper business with ethics and being a good capitalist as opposed to be practicing capitalism soullessly.

Draw power means jack shit. According to your logic, people who have absolutely no merit but only draw power should be hired for jobs they are incompetent to do. Which again, is antithetical to what the fight in Culture War is about. Have you been reading Ethan's "it's all about money" bs book lately? I'm all for making money. It's stupid to say you're for that, then go ahead and prop up Anna's sister's corpse as a point of contention when the outrage from WC initially came from them not thinking she deserved any of the opportunity she got, but WC didn't help themselves in the way in which they approached it which was with stupid memes. Had this outrage come from anyone else who wasn't a group of retards, then maybe people actually see the actual point of contention.

This is the train of thought that lands you into why the "Culture War" is a thing. People thought Social Justice would sell, and what happened? The "real world" you're speaking of is exactly the type of world the majority of idiots like to repeat because they can't think for themselves and only follow mob mentality. Once you fall into mob mentality, you might as well be an SJW, which anti-SJWs are that as well, whether they want to believe it or not, but their train of thinking is exactly from the same place.
 
CapeKnight said:
There's a difference between conducting proper business with ethics and being a good capitalist as opposed to be practicing capitalism soullessly.

Draw power means jack shit. According to your logic, people who have absolutely no merit but only draw power should be hired for jobs they are incompetent to do. Which again, is antithetical to what the fight in Culture War is about. Have you been reading Ethan's "it's all about money" bs book lately? I'm all for making money. It's stupid to say you're for that, then go ahead and prop up Anna's sister's corpse as a point of contention when the outrage from WC initially came from them not thinking she deserved any of the opportunity she got, but WC didn't help themselves in the way in which they approached it which was with stupid memes. Had this outrage come from anyone else who wasn't a group of retards, then maybe people actually see the actual point of contention.

This is the train of thought that lands you into why the "Culture War" is a thing. People thought Social Justice would sell, and what happened? The "real world" you're speaking of is exactly the type of world the majority of idiots like to repeat because they can't think for themselves and only follow mob mentality. Once you fall into mob mentality, you might as well be an SJW, which anti-SJWs are that as well, whether they want to believe it or not, but their train of thinking is exactly from the same place.
Click to expand...
How can you say draw-power means jack shit when in your last post you complain that Anna got a cover solely because of her draw power? Her sales for 3 hours work speaks for itself.

How is she practicing capitalism soullessly? That seems pretty subjective to me. If Dynamite had offered you that cover I'm sure you would've turned it down on principle. Right? It doesn't matter that nobody has ever heard of you either since draw-power means jack shit. Your cover would earn just as much. Right?
 
Last edited:
SaidNoOneEver said:
How can you say draw-power means jack shit when in your last post you complain that Anna got a cover solely because of her draw power? Her sales for 3 hours work speaks for itself.

How is she practicing capitalism soullessly? That seems pretty subjective to me. If Dynamite had offered you that cover I'm sure you would've turned it down on principle. Right?
Click to expand...

I don't remember phrasing it as a complain. It means jack shit because at the end of the day, it's not on merit. I think monetizing your dead sister for sympathy bucks is pretty soulless, don't know how that's subjective, but you do you. To me, she might as well join TUG in his constant victimhood for pity bucks.

And yes, I would definitely turn down a Dynamite cover and recommend someone else who can actually draw. But nice try.
 
Last edited:
CapeKnight said:
I don't remember phrasing it as a complain. It means jack shit because at the end of the day, it's not on merit. I think monetizing your dead sister for sympathy bucks is pretty soulless, don't know how that's subjective, but you do you. To me, she might as well join TUG in his constant victimhood for pity bucks.

And yes, I would definitely turn down a Dynamite cover and recommend someone else who can actually draw. But nice try.
Click to expand...
Will you concede that draw-power does, in fact, mean shit?

How did she monetize her dead sister? I missed that.
 
Last edited:
SaidNoOneEver said:
You concede that draw-power does, in fact, mean shit?

How did she monetize her dead sister? I missed that.
Click to expand...

You seem to be severely misunderstanding the point I was making. Again, I ask, have you been reading Ethan's "it's all about money" bs book lately? If you think selling out your character means something, then good luck on whatever you do.

Look at her campaign. That cover was specifically justified as being a tribute to her dead sister, in a shitty artstyle that supposedly her sister liked. Ethan even justified it in Oz's stream that she has a right to do that. Also, Ethan's own words "pretty girls have it easier", if that isn't blatant giving in the double standards that favors women, then you and I must be living on different realities. It's also the same double standards SJWs like to propagate.

All this outrage promoting for her cover being excused as "it's for her sister, so excuse the shitty art and simps, buy into it" is monetizing on her sister's death. It's not even in the same realm as someone putting a "dedicated to so so and who passed away" because they aren't on YouTube making a shitshow and have dubious and questionable merits and motivations to begin with. The entertainment industry does this all the time when someone dies and a work that features them is coming out. And that doesn't ever look good on them. When The Dark Knight was coming out, a lot of people's reasoning for why the movie was good was because Heath Ledger died and he was "ohmygawdsogoooodinitlikeyouknowhediedforit". Now, there's a clear difference between those two: Heath actually has merit in that film, whereas Anna's work doesn't.

I don't remember the grieving process requiring the need to be paid for it.
 
Last edited:
CapeKnight said:
You seem to be severely misunderstanding the point I was making. Again, I ask, have you been reading Ethan's "it's all about money" bs book lately? If you think selling out your character means something, then good luck on whatever you do.

Look at her campaign. That cover was specifically justified as being a tribute to her dead sister, in a shitty artstyle that supposedly her sister liked. Ethan even justified it in Oz's stream that she has a right to do that. Also, Ethan's own words "pretty girls have it easier", if that isn't blatant giving in the double standards that favors women, then you and I must be living on different realities. It's also the same double standards SJWs like to propagate.

All this outrage promoting for her cover being excused as "it's for her sister, so excuse the shitty art and simps, buy into it" is monetizing on her sister's death. It's not even in the same realm as someone putting a "dedicated to so so and who passed away" because they aren't on YouTube making a shitshow and have dubious and questionable merits and motivations to begin with. The entertainment industry does this all the time when someone dies and a work that features them is coming out. And that doesn't ever look good on them. When The Dark Knight was coming out, a lot of people's reasoning for why the movie was good was because Heath Ledger died and he was "ohmygawdsogoooodinitlikeyouknowhediedforit". Now, there's a clear difference between those two: Heath actually has merit in that film, whereas Anna's work doesn't.

I don't remember the grieving process requiring the need to be paid for it.
Click to expand...
He discussed it again with her on the livestream that's still on. Seems pretty harsh calling a tribute "monetizing death." Do you feel the same about every book and movie with a "Dedicated To" or "In Memory Of" script or image?

THAT seems soulless to me, but to each their own.

As for the quality of the artwork that is totally subjective. I find it creepy to learn how many grown-ass men still play with toys but I'd be more than happy to produce\sell them those toys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom