Content on a Scale?

[ChurchOfGodBear]

This could be a great idea, it could be a total waste of time. I figured I'd throw out the suggestion and just see what everyone else thought.

Could it be useful to flag new content by how close to the source it is? Something like:

1 - Direct-from-Chris Video
2 - Chris Facebook or E-mail
3 - Facebook/Email leak via a third party
4 - "Inner Circle" updates
5 - Recently uncovered info from Chris's long past (googling old forum posts, etc.)
6 - Relevant info discovered for matters pertaining to Chris (the fate of the Game Place, etc.)

I used numbers, but one could just as easily use colors or any other filing system. Any thoughts?

 

[Chikinballs]

Confusing.

 

[Holdek]

This could be a great idea, it could be a total waste of time. I figured I'd throw out the suggestion and just see what everyone else thought.

Could it be useful to flag new content by how close to the source it is? Something like:

1 - Direct-from-Chris Video
2 - Chris Facebook or E-mail
3 - Facebook/Email leak via a third party
4 - "Inner Circle" updates
5 - Recently uncovered info from Chris's long past (googling old forum posts, etc.)
6 - Relevant info discovered for matters pertaining to Chris (the fate of the Game Place, etc.)

I used numbers, but one could just as easily use colors or any other filing system. Any thoughts?

If your concern is proximity to Chris, it could be simplified. Really, numbers 1 through 3 are all from Chris, so they could be consolidated as "primary source." 4 is second-hand knowledge from people who know the guy, so that's "secondary source." And 5 and 6 is basically "tertiary source" because it's info "uncovered" by anyone interested in Chris that has previously been disclosed by field agents and the like. So I think instead of six levels/colors you could just use three.