Corey Shiratori (formerly Corey Ray Barnhill / August Heart) / [Lulz] Xyrix / RuxPin / Zoom / Internet GodSpeed - Self-confessed pedophile sadist, forced underage girl to watch child pornography, skiddie turned fed, chronic liar

Spectre_06 said:
Complaint reads:

Violation of Federal Reserve Regulation "E" Section 205.6 "Failure to adhere to consumer liability limits. Blames consumer, stalls investigation, delays police investigation, emotional distress caused.

Response (all defenses separate):

First Defense: Complaint fails to state a cause of action against BANA upon which relief may be granted and must therefore be dismissed.

Second Defense: Plaintiff has not been damaged by reason of any act of BANA, and Defendants have not breached any legal duty to Plaintiff, but have acted properly in all respects.

Third Defense: Defendants state that Plaintiff fails to allege any cognizable damages against BANA in this matter.

Fourth Defense: Plaintiff failed to name a necessary and indispensable party i.e. Hyun Wo, who appears to be Plaintiff's former business partner.

Fifth Defense: Defendants relied upon Plaintiff’s instructions in correctly sending the subject funds transfer(s) as directed by Plaintiff to a designated recipient identified by Plaintiff and as such, Defendants’ actions in so doing, does not constitute a wrongful transfer

Sixth Defense: Defendant BANA denied Plaintiff’s claim of unauthorized account access as Plaintiff had provided account access and authorization to a third party to perform various transactions.

Seventh Defense: The transaction(s) in question was authorized and/or ratified by Plaintiff.

Eighth Defense: Plaintiff’s action is barred by Plaintiff’s own negligence.

Ninth Defense: If Plaintiff sustained damages as alleged, which Defendants deny, such damages were caused by a person or entity whose conduct Defendants did not control and for whom Defendants are not legally responsible.

Tenth Defense: The conduct of Defendants was not the proximate cause of any damage sustained by Plaintiff.

Eleventh Defense: Plaintiff’s claims are barred due to the failure to mitigate, obviate, diminish or otherwise to lessen or reduce the injuries and damages alleged in the Complaint.

Twelfth Defense: This action is barred by Regulation E (12 CFR 205.1 et seq.) pursuant to the federal Electronic Funds Transfer Act, governing electronic transactions, including but not limited to deposits and debits to bank accounts.

Thirteenth Defense: Defendants deny that it is liable or indebted to Plaintiff.

Fourteenth Defense: Plaintiff’s action is barred by the principle of waiver.

Fifteenth Defense: Plaintiff’s action is barred by the principle of estoppel.

Sixteenth Defense: Plaintiff’s action is barred by the principle of laches.

Seventeenth Defense: Plaintiff’s action is barred by the principle of unclean hands.

Eighteenth Defense: Defendant BANA’s relationship with its depositor is based in contract as a matter of law and BANA is obliged to honor all withdrawal transactions by said depositor.

Nineteenth Defense: Plaintiff’s actions are barred by the various provisions of the applicable governing contract of deposit including BANA’s online banking agreement.

Twentieth Defense: Any recovery by Plaintiff herein would result in Plaintiff’s unjust enrichment.

Twenty-First Defense: Defendant Andrea Calderon is an improper party defendant.

Twenty-Second Defense: Defendant Andrea Calderon was not involved in the alleged unauthorized funds transactions filed by Plaintiff and it is unknown why Plaintiff has named her as a defendant. TWENTY-THIRD SEPARATE DEFENSE Defendants reserve the right to raise any other defenses or Counterclaims discovered through pretrial discovery or during the course of trial. WHEREFORE, Defendants, Bank of America, N.A., and Andrea Calderon demand judgment dismissing the Complaint of Corey R. Barnhill, together with such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Click to expand...
Are you that same anon, Spectre?
 
Smarty Pants said:
Are you that same anon, Spectre?
Click to expand...

Nope. Haven't posted to those forums for about six months, but I looked it up via New Jersey's court search database and found it. The only thing not in there is the stipulation agreement itself.
 

Attachments

  • gs_spectre.jpg
    gs_spectre.jpg
    127.6 KB · Views: 534
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Pixis, Chichan and 1 other person
I just provided what the court documents, I made no insinuations one way or the other.

EDIT: Although it confirms Corey does pay attention to here, despite claims to the contrary. And I can admit when something's wrong. I went by what was available publicly and added "it seems like". He's just upset that he can only claim I LARP as a Marine (which he knows to be untrue), but we can call him a pedophile based on his own words.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt
I did some digging because I swore I heard someone say they wanted the original Zoom pedo allegations Killstream that seemed to have been completely deleted from the internet. At first I found a bunch of streams done in the aftermath of it, but after finding the original link to the stream and using some internet magic (Google) I found what is likely the only mirror copy in existence (part of the beginning seem to be gone but the bulk of the stream is intact):

Killstream Mirror (Unlisted)

(Bonus Stream) Experience the stream as Bryan Dunn (Unlisted)

also here's one of the clips played on that Killstream that I don't think I've seen be posted here:

In the aftermath of the allegations there were some talks between Zoom and the Anime Mafia people where he became allied with them to take out Donga, I ended up finding some of those streams as well. There's a lot to go through in these but in the first video he talks about how the Killstream that he got exposed on came about, retells his side of the story again, shits on Andy and praises JF (lol), shits on Joachim and Donga a lot, and talks about the Joachim's swatting. The second vid I only skimmed through but seemed to be more of the same.

 
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: NOT Sword Fighter Super, DispatchCommit, Pixis and 8 others
Deadbeef Chief said:
Why does this guy sounds like he's on painkillers? Zoom never sounds like he's completely with us - he always sounds like he's on the verge of passing out.
Click to expand...
Supposedly he takes adderall. Probably takes too many so he has to use downers to go to sleep or some shit idk.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Unog
So been lurking Kiwifarms for a while and never cared to make an account until now. Just going to preface with the fact I don't care either way about the Null-Zoom drama and find it funnier to view them both critically as fat pedo failed programmers who like their women thicc. That said, a discrepancy in Zoom's statement in the second killstream clip above occurs to me. Zoom states the girl is "like 25". In the audio she states she's 13. Zoom responds saying this occurred in 2011 and it is currently 2018. The math for this obviously doesn't line up and the difference is too big to account for a simple mistake, especially given how quickly he responds with the years of the events. Additionally the alleged "transcript" he's reading in that video doesn't break from my expectations of how he normally talks, making me skeptical of his defense that it's a transcript in the first place.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Redd, Kamov Ka-52 and 5 others
God's Sped said:
So been lurking Kiwifarms for a while and never cared to make an account until now. Just going to preface with the fact I don't care either way about the Null-Zoom drama and find it funnier to view them both critically as fat pedo failed programmers who like their women thicc. That said, a discrepancy in Zoom's statement in the second killstream clip above occurs to me. Zoom states the girl is "like 25". In the audio she states she's 13. Zoom responds saying this occurred in 2011 and it is currently 2018. The math for this obviously doesn't line up and the difference is too big to account for a simple mistake, especially given how quickly he responds with the years of the events. Additionally the alleged "transcript" he's reading in that video doesn't break from my expectations of how he normally talks, making me skeptical of his defense that it's a transcript in the first place.
Click to expand...
So that would have made her 18 at the time of the recording, if I'm getting the numbers correct. Hmmm, I'd have to go back and review the audio to know for sure what he said then versus what he claims now, but it appears as if you are indeed correct.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Unog
According to him, she's "like 25" now which means she should've been 18 at the time of the events which they used for their "transcript", but in the audio she states she's 13 so that would mean according to the "transcript" she should be 20 now. It's probably a meaningless discrepancy, just found it curious.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Unog
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back