QR code stickers with some flavor of "the last bastion of free speech" that link to the site. Stick them in public places like street light poles and such.
QR code stickers with some flavor of "the last bastion of free speech" that link to the site. Stick them in public places like street light poles and such.
While it's true that in that particular instance I host both the routing agent and the upstream requester service (upstream service), which is why I warned against logging into your account or doing any other sensitive things, this doesn't have to be the case. As noted in the original post, they're designed to be separate from each other, and the client that your browser loads does public key exchange (ECDH) of your data encryption keys with a key that only the upstream service posesses, so if a trusted party (i.e. Josh) were to host said service (for affiliated parties which host the agent, public availability is not required and would be harmful in the current concept, there are 3 layers of trust in this design that I can explain if needed) and control the static website CDN so that clientside files are not tampered with, other parties can host the routing agent and yet the requests they process would not be decryptable by them.
Similarly I think it's possible to use Snowflake for a secure websocket bridge from clearnet into Tor. However this still means trusting the static site and it's not really any simpler/easier than a normal Tor browser. The browsing experience would not be transparent, all resources would be fetched with JS, etc. It's basically a DIY Tor browser running inside a webpage.
The vantablack retards stumbling in here going "uuhhh maybe we should c-cuck and c-compromise on the site's principles juust a little maybe, gentlesirs" are really something special. Do they think they're convincing, at all? Babbys first gayop?
If we know that the lolcows are using their government gibs, is it possible to predict when they get their next gimmedat and set up a countdown timer at the top of the page until the next DDOS?
I'm pretty sure it's too random to actually do so but I'd be pleasantly surprised if we can crunch the numbers and at least predict a DDOS a few days ahead of time. maybe we could have a chart of what state each high risk lolcow lives in and track the payout schedule used then predict the probability of ddos attacks like its a weather news update.
Maybe some automated system where certain precursors (like the USPG2 thread jumping to Mach Chicken) can trigger a potential ddos alert.
DDOSes will never be successful in bringing the site down permanently because in order to do that, they'd need infinite money to keep buying resources to DDOS with. And most of KF's enemies are broke trannies living on welfare. There are some rich nepotroons, but even they eventually give up, once they realize they could be buying their favorite anime porn coom instead of wasting all their money on DDOSing.
I'm not trying to separate myself from the farms, I'm trying to ensure our longevity by pointing out that the world runs on social agreements and that 90% of people have decided they hate phonebooking and would be happy with using government force to stop it from occurring, including most of the U.S and influential people on the right wing. They'll never stop phonebooking completely, but they'd still have enough power to make this forum comply with a U.S law targeting it, or else get bled dry monetarily. If Null and other farmers don't want this, the onus is on them to convince the wider public that you should be allowed to phonebook people, and I hope they do try. But again, sometimes circumstances are a bitch and the best thing to do is make compromises if it can give you a societal edge against the Naughts and Elaine Millers of the world.
It's crazy people absolutely refuse to accept this fact. I get not wanting to cave into it, I get not wanting to agree with the public's opinion on it, sure, but the idea of "The average person (both normie and chronically online) is strongly against phonebooking and its the primary reason they are against kiwifarms" is just undeniably true. Yeah the trannies and primary suspects will want the site dead and gone regardless, but they aren't the norm, they aren't the average person, the average person just hears "Website that posts private information on people" and go "oh, don't like that, they should be punished." You don't have to censor or pander to the public, but you can't get delusional about it, you have to keep it in mind when deciding how to handle situations, you can't even begin to go about fixing any problem if you refuse to acknowledge it.
It's crazy people absolutely refuse to accept this fact. I get not wanting to cave into it, I get not wanting to agree with the public's opinion on it, sure, but the idea of "The average person (both normie and chronically online) is strongly against phonebooking and its the primary reason they are against kiwifarms" is just undeniably true. Yeah the trannies and primary suspects will want the site dead and gone regardless, but they aren't the norm, they aren't the average person, the average person just hears "Website that posts private information on people" and go "oh, don't like that, they should be punished." You don't have to censor or pander to the public, but you can't get delusional about it, you have to keep it in mind when deciding how to handle situations, you can't even begin to go about fixing any problem if you refuse to acknowledge it.
The average normie doesn't have fully formed opinions on most anything, just parroted thoughts made popular, and most importantly socially acceptable, by retarded trannies with personal vendettas. If the average person were sat down and shown that our subjects of ridicule and "illegal doxing" are largely pedophiles, zoophiles, sadists, antisocial autists, sociopaths and psychopaths, and general stains on society I doubt they'd object to what we're doing at all. They'd likely applaud it
What the average normie hears from Wikipedia and the talking heads in media is that we kill trannies and bother normal working-class people. We don't have an image problem because we host dox, we have an image problem because the faggots upset that we watch and record their faggotry have connections in high places or can personally see the site is harmed in some way. Us not hosting dox going forward isn't going to change the narrative that we kill trannies and bother normal people. The slander and disinformation campaign won't end until the site is dead and gay forever, and Null's entire bloodline is trannified or killed
The only reason doxing is seeing pushback now is because Leftist agitators are publishing the information of their political opposition as an act of textbook terrorism. I wouldn't equate what we do (tying a degenerate's digital footprint to their IRL identity, branding them with a modern day scarlet letter), to what Leftists are doing (publishing personal information in order scare their opponents into submission and hopefully have them killed by a psychotic freak)
It doesn't need to be endlessly litigated, it really just comes down to "never apologize." Everyone should understand this. You see what happens when you apologize, they shove your nose in the dirt and step on your neck with the boot forever. Your career doesn't come back. They don't forgive, they don't let up.
Us not hosting dox going forward isn't going to change the narrative that we kill trannies and bother normal people. The slander and disinformation campaign won't end until the site is dead and gay forever, and Null's entire bloodline is trannified or killed
It's not something I'm willing to collect evidence for so this will be the last I comment on it but I really suggest at the very least re-thinking this stance, because personally anyone I've talked to about kiwifarms never mention being responsible for deaths or suicides or whatever, I forgot that was even an allegation, it's literally always just been a problem with doxing. I think you (used generally) just may be too involved to fully appreciate the perspective of people outside looking in.
It's not something I'm willing to collect evidence for so this will be the last I comment on it but I really suggest at the very least re-thinking this stance, because personally anyone I've talked to about kiwifarms never mention being responsible for deaths or suicides or whatever, I forgot that was even an allegation, it's literally always just been a problem with doxing. I think you (used generally) just may be too involved to fully appreciate the perspective of people outside looking in.
x 31 
