Feedback deleting WIP Threads, with little to no content

[herefortheactualthreads]

Hello, my personal issue in the prospering grounds is, that too many newfags are making new thread with little to no content calling it WIP or "editing now".

Since when did Kiwi Farms became tolerant of half-assed/baked threads?

Either make fucking full threads and expand them when there are updates, or dont fucking post it at all.

People like @Relinquish, @Admiral Throbnelius or any rewriters are fine by me, they do not bother me, because at least they do gods work.

Example: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/wip-al...issistic-gender-queer-lolicon-fanatic.198031/



Is it possible to do something against this? If i am the minority here i take all the blame, no biggies.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Deleted.

 

[We Are The Witches]

It's what happened with the Pamperchu thread...

---

---

There's a re-write, but on a new thread, which misses all comments from the previous (so they'd need to be moved).
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/op-rewrite-michael-vincent-gifford-pamperchu.197016/#post-18973805

 

[Admiral Throbnelius]

This is just my opinion, but I think as long as the initially posted draft of the OP has a decent amount of content and substance, it's okay to post it as a WIP. Sometimes the scope of the OP and the direction it goes can be completely different from what you expect. For example, my Linkara OP Rewrite has gotten so massive that I had to split it into two posts. I also think if you're going to post a WIP OP, you should indicate it's a WIP in the title with a [WIP] in front of the thread title, because without that, like in this example, it can imply it's a complete thread. For the example @herefortheactualthreads gave, I think the OP might have felt that he had to get the thread out or else someone else might take it, leading to him rushing. He should formulate a decent draft and then post. I was willing to give him some leeway though because he recently did the Chris Tyson OP rewrite, so unlike a lot of the lazy newfag PA threads, I think he was genuinely trying to make something decent and just bumbled the initial execution.

There's a re-write, but on a new thread, which misses all comments from the previous (so they'd need to be moved).
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/op-rewrite-michael-vincent-gifford-pamperchu.197016/#post-18973805

If it's like my Shadman OP rewrite or the recent Chris Tyson one, the PG thread is just for feedback. When it's approved, Null will copy the PG OP, replace the original OP and close the PG thread.

 

[Diggus Bickus]

I've had this thing happen lately where newfaggots and retarded lurkers would just throw trashcans and tophats at me for telling retards who don't know how to make threads NYPA. "WIP" should only be used in situations where there's at least SOMETHING to read other than it being a short post. It is a big problem and the quality of threads has decreased severely because of it, much more so because of the retarded outlook people have when you say NYPA.

Small edit: Like fucking clockwork.

 

[Chongqing]

This is just my opinion, but I think as long as the initially posted draft of the OP has a decent amount of content and substance, it's okay to post it as a WIP.

I disagree because there's no rush. Just post it when it's done.

 

[spacko]

placeholder (writing reply atm)

 

[Osama Bin Laden]

People like @Relinquish, @Admiral Throbnelius or any rewriters are fine by me, they do not bother me, because at least they do gods work.

i guess im chopped liver

 

[Diggus Bickus]

I disagree because there's no rush. Just post it when it's done.

At that rate don't be a stupid faggot and don't post it to begin with. Construct some substance first, post, and then edit as more developments occur or your research just so happens to get more stuff.

 

[rebel]

Don't delete them; they are a starting place to something greater.

 

[UERISIMILITUDO]

My thread took me a while to write, and I just kept exporting the BB code output every time I worked on it, and also in case there were issues with the site. That was back before I allowed JavaScript here, and I haven't written a thread that took me so long since, so I suppose it's worth asking about the interface for writing a thread over such a long period of time. Will the site save my drafts for me, and are there any time limits involved? I'll probably export the raw output regardless, because it would really suck to spend weeks on a thread only to lose it.

 

[Fastest Hand In The East]

newfaggots and retarded lurkers would just throw trashcans and tophats at me for telling retards who don't know how to make threads NYPA

Why do you even care?

 

[Daddy's Angry Juice]

I've had this thing happen lately where newfaggots and retarded lurkers would just throw trashcans and tophats at me for telling retards who don't know how to make threads NYPA. "WIP" should only be used in situations where there's at least SOMETHING to read other than it being a short post. It is a big problem and the quality of threads has decreased severely because of it, much more so because of the retarded outlook people have when you say NYPA.

Small edit: Like fucking clockwork.
View attachment 6308843

id like you to know that i only did that because it was funny. and the fact that you reacted to it is even funnier, but ill only take credit for the original funny.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

placeholder (writing reply atm)

That seems to be a very quality reply, sir. I will have to move it out of PG post haste

Will the site save my drafts for me, and are there any time limits involved?

From memory, the saved drafts are not long, and likewise do not stay saved for long