Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 385 26.1%
  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 53 3.6%
  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,039 70.3%

  • Total voters
    1,477
Tons of autists threw millions at him, without even knowing what his comic is about (!) just because he promised them it's anti-woke & now he is getting his ass kissed.
Yeah that's one of the first red flags of a internet grifter, never tells you what the product is all about just tells you what the product is going to make the consumer feel.
 
Tons of autists threw millions at him, without even knowing what his comic is about (!) just because he promised them it's anti-woke & now he is getting his ass kissed.
It's honestly shocking that so many people can't see through him of who he really is. How are so many people so gullible to this charlatan?
 
Last edited:
A thrift store IG found one of the old 1986 recalled little mermaid posters. These posters/original art were recalled because the guy that made it put a giant dick into the architecture on purpose.
1658326889679.png
1658326900991.png
 
A thrift store IG found one of the old 1986 recalled little mermaid posters. These posters/original art were recalled because the guy that made it put a giant dick into the architecture on purpose.
View attachment 3509703View attachment 3509704
I'm not seeing a dick, just architecture. Someone had to have just been thirsting for some when they were looking at it and decided to throw a fit. In fact, the redrawn version looks more like a dick than the original one.
1658337585003.png
 
So apparently Zombies 3 had a non-binary character (a girl)

Through the Spanish dub apparently refers to her as female. Spain is based it seems.

But seriously those online saying "I'm so glad they included a non-binary bisexual" don't seem to relaized how both those terms kind of contradict in so many ways.

Like this is way people make fun of them and call them special labels.
 
White savior moment is why it ended up being racist.

Everything racist about the film was built off weird shit that does not matter to the average viewer given it is a Disney film. One of the main complaints is the depiction of a healthy relationship between blacks and whites, which many feel is Disney turning a blind eye to real history. I guess they want slave torture porn so that it is historically accurate.

The film also uses the term tar baby, which, while not a racial term, has been co-opted as one.

A lot of the film’s problematic material comes from complete misconceptions. The blacks are not slaves as the story takes place post-Civil War, but many think they are. Because of this, they think the film is rewriting history to remove the sins of the white man. They also look for certain terms and inflections of that time period and point to that as racial depictions, not taking in that the white children say them too.

In general, the film is a story of a white boy befriending a black man in a still racially divided time period. They still depict whites as unaware of black’s troubles and blacks as the good guys, but because history is sanitized it is racist.
The best Disney movie always has its haters. Funny how the only good one is defiantly hated by the most zealot of Disney fans.
 
Back