- Joined
- Dec 8, 2014
For a long time I've had a sneaking suspicion that the subjects a person studies can affect their view of the world, political or philosophical. I've found that I tend to use this model a lot to explain political differences. I catch myself thinking that people would easily change their mind if they only understood history or science (my specific areas of autistic interest) better.
I've seen firsthand that when taking an interest in history, people tend to use history to contextualize modern events. They see war, unrest, and societal collapses as inevitable because they know that all societies before them engaged in war, unrest, and eventually collapsed. On the other hand, those who are interested in the sciences tend to envision sustained technological advancement as humanity comes together for the greater good of reason. Then you have me, having been informed of the flaws of human nature through history, but viewing technological advancement as important if only in the short term.
This effect is, of course, more obvious in social sciences, cultural studies, and the like. These courses essentially hand the students a worldview and model of human behavior to be accepted at face value.
Do you think this assessment is correct? Could it be the other way around, and the predisposition of a person dictates their interests? Could it be that my worldview is the poorly informed one and Economics majors have all the answers?
I've seen firsthand that when taking an interest in history, people tend to use history to contextualize modern events. They see war, unrest, and societal collapses as inevitable because they know that all societies before them engaged in war, unrest, and eventually collapsed. On the other hand, those who are interested in the sciences tend to envision sustained technological advancement as humanity comes together for the greater good of reason. Then you have me, having been informed of the flaws of human nature through history, but viewing technological advancement as important if only in the short term.
This effect is, of course, more obvious in social sciences, cultural studies, and the like. These courses essentially hand the students a worldview and model of human behavior to be accepted at face value.
Do you think this assessment is correct? Could it be the other way around, and the predisposition of a person dictates their interests? Could it be that my worldview is the poorly informed one and Economics majors have all the answers?