- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
To be clear this is not intended as a holier-than-thou moralizing post, I don't care about either drag or blackface performances. It's just strange to me that one is accepted and the other is widely condemned, when from my POV they are the same concept.
Blackface shows are considered derogatory in the present day because it was nonblacks dressing as an extremely exaggerated caricature of a black person, and doing performances based on that caricature. If drag was judged by the same standard as blackface it would be considered sexist, because drag is men dressing as a extremely exaggerated caricature of a woman and doing performances based on that caricature. Its the same concept.
Others have brought up this point, and the responses I saw defending it seem to argue that (most) drag isn't intended as derogatory or malicious, and women are ok with it so that means its not sexist. But, both of those responses could apply to minstrel shows too. Al Jolson was arguably the most famous blackface performer of all time, and his work was actually liked by many contemporary blacks.
But you will never see anyone defending minstrel shows on the basis that lots of blacks liked it at the time. Yet leftists defend drag shows on the basis that lots of women (supposedly) like it.
Call me autistic or retarded or whatever, but if I can dress up as a woman to act out retarded woman stereotypes, I should be able to dress up as a nigger to act out retarded nigger stereotypes.
Now if you dislike both, that is at least consistent. But I think that if you are ok with drag but not blackface, you are a hypocrite.
Blackface shows are considered derogatory in the present day because it was nonblacks dressing as an extremely exaggerated caricature of a black person, and doing performances based on that caricature. If drag was judged by the same standard as blackface it would be considered sexist, because drag is men dressing as a extremely exaggerated caricature of a woman and doing performances based on that caricature. Its the same concept.
Others have brought up this point, and the responses I saw defending it seem to argue that (most) drag isn't intended as derogatory or malicious, and women are ok with it so that means its not sexist. But, both of those responses could apply to minstrel shows too. Al Jolson was arguably the most famous blackface performer of all time, and his work was actually liked by many contemporary blacks.
But you will never see anyone defending minstrel shows on the basis that lots of blacks liked it at the time. Yet leftists defend drag shows on the basis that lots of women (supposedly) like it.
Call me autistic or retarded or whatever, but if I can dress up as a woman to act out retarded woman stereotypes, I should be able to dress up as a nigger to act out retarded nigger stereotypes.
Now if you dislike both, that is at least consistent. But I think that if you are ok with drag but not blackface, you are a hypocrite.