Science Driver's license for men only from 26 years up - Berlin-based "traffic scientist" proposes no longer giving driver's licences to men age 25 and below

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Translation by yours truly. Original source [A]


Driver's license for men only from 26 years up​

On contemporary lunacy.

This entire day, something has been bugging me.

I could recall that I heard something in the radio this morning that made me think, how can anyone be so stupid, I need to write about this, but I forgot it by the time I got out of the bath. I knew I wanted to write about a topic today, but I didn't recall what it was.

That is terrible. I don't know if it is a sign of age, or if you just get used to these nonsense floods. There is this effect that the brain memorizes new things very good and in detail, but the more something becomes routine, the less it remains in memory. Maybe I have built up too much of a routine in dealing with nonsense and, by noon, I no longer know what nonsense I heard on the radio that morning.

But a reader reminded me again.

A Berlin-based research scientist - ... you know, when the story already starts with "Berlin scientist" ... - advocates for only giving driver's licenses to men after they are 26 years old.

"When the number of accidents caused by speeding doesn't go down, we need to have a talk on whether men should only get a driver's license after concluding their 26th year of life", traffic scientist Prof. Andreas Knie PhD (63, TU Berlin) told the broadcaster RBB. "There are old archaic structures behind this, as well as a long outdated masculinity craze which is acting out."

I had three, four questions running through my head this morning while I was half asleep:
  • Doesn't the constitution say that nobody may be disadvantaged because of their sex? How can you even become a professor if you don't even know that much?
  • How do they want to know who is a "man" when everybody can declare themselves to be a woman or a cylinder head gasket?
  • How do they want to know who is "26" years old when every immigrant can throw away their documents and declare an arbitrary date of birth or take on multiple identities? Then you are simultaneously 13 years old for child benefits and immunity from criminal liability and 26 years old for your driver's license.
  • What do you even need a driver's license for? Didn't they recently say after a general police inspection that, in Berlin, roughly 10% of drivers do not possess a driver's license that passes an inspection?
When I was more awake, other questions appeared to me.

For instance, whether the professors in Berlin are so run-down right now that they just blather the most arbitrary crazy shit to still get talked about in the media.

Or why this dude is being passed for as a traffic scientist even though he is a political scientist and sociologist, thus on the far-left fringe in Berlin, and doesn't just pass his ideological shit as science, as the vast majority of professors do nowadays, but apparently even genuinely thinks it is science:

In numerous publications, Andreas Knie advocates for a departure from car-based traffic policy and a traffic paradigm shift towards more flexibility of public services. He suggests changing the political and legal frameworks as "real experiments".[12] His demand for limits [or borders? ambiguous wording here] for privately owned cars triggers numerous comments on editorials and media reports.[13][14] Unlike vehement car critics such as Hermann Knoflacher or Winfried Wolf, Knie does not reject the car in its entirety. Instead, since the 1990s, he is supporting new ways of usage, such as car sharing.[15] In addition, he demands additional mobility offers, such as Call a bike.[16] According to Knie, digital platforms strengthen the tendency to combine different mobility offers.[17] A further topic is the future of traffic policy under the conditions of demographic change.[18]

And that is the crucial point: They are trying to sell us a political agenda as science. We already know that from climate.

Or, in other words: The German "science", at least at the universities, isn't worth a damn. Especially not in Berlin.

People, what do you think, how much carbon emissions can be saved if you closed down the Berlin universities?
 
I don't think that's what this is. It seems like he specifically just wants to limit men from getting their license until 26. Not stop everyone else from getting a license in general.
Surely Dog-O-Tron is merely jesting
I mean, no way I did such a piss-poor job translating this thing that you could reasonably come to that conclusion unironically
... right? (:_(
 
Surely Dog-O-Tron is merely jesting
I mean, no way I did such a piss-poor job translating this thing that you could reasonably come to that conclusion unironically
... right? (:_(
I think its more that the original article is not very forthcoming on the subject
 
I think its more that the original article is not very forthcoming on the subject
I thought it's pretty obvious that it's just about disadvantaging men. Otherwise, there would not be mentions of "masculinity" running amok and the constitution forbidding sex discrimination, even if it is against men.
 
This is the kind of retarded thinking that can only come out of the mind of a german. It is so retarded that it is a complete waste of time even discuss.

Research globally became complete shit around 2019-2020. I am talking from the point of using a academic database in the last year. For example: There is essentially no data on marriage and younger generations, with the exception (Gen Z/ younger millennials) out side of niggers/homosexuals (homosexual niggers especially). Literally nothing in several academic databases, and data for earlier generations stops at around 2018. That isn't even going into inconvenient data for certain technologies being pushed at the moment. Want hard numbers on just how bad a cobalt mine can be for the environment? No data. Want to know what the numbers on toxicity of solar panels/batteries, such as what they can do long term due to where they are placed? Especially since both are typically classified as toxic in someway, to the point that batteries are instructed to be installed isolated from interior air? Nothing at all. I guess all that time and money is better spent on telling white people to kiss minority ass, and coming up with retarded proposals like this. Powerlevel: Accredited M Arch
 
looking at it purely objectively, it's not a crazy idea. i don't have any actual data on hand, but i'd guess boys between the ages of 16-25 probably account for 90% of speeding accidents, crashes, road rage, and other testosterone related vehicular crime

however, the second you start applying the same "despite making up x% of the population, they account for y% of the crimes" logic to OTHER groups these same people freak out and try to get the government to take away your children and your job and your home. so fuck 'em
 
I support voting rights starting at 30 and ending at 67.

This way you understand that your vote truly counts and it is important, as an adult you have seen elections come and and go and you want to do something about it! But you can't, because you're just 27! Suddenly most people will understand that you better use the vote or lose the voice! It also makes it much more important for women to vote because they can only vote between the ages of 35 and 57. That's on purpose to drive home the importance of women voting and how women's voices are unheard in a lot of things. This makes it more feminist.
 
Especially since both are typically classified as toxic in someway, to the point that batteries are instructed to be installed isolated from interior air?
My understanding is that this applies only to standard lead-acid batteries since they release hydrogen, am I mistaken? I can't remember seeing anything in the SDS for lithium ion battery banks but I will acknowledge I don't quite remember off hand
 
I support voting rights starting at 30 and ending at 67.

This way you understand that your vote truly counts and it is important, most people will understand that you live most of your life without it and you better use it or lose it! It also makes it much more important for women to vote because they can only vote between the ages of 35 and 57. That's on purpose to drive home the importance of women voting and how women's voices are unheard in a lot of things. This makes it more feminist.
I support voting rights starting at 3000 and ending at 6700. The more open the vote is, the worse off a democracy is. Plus, with that voting age, (read in Null's voice) there are ghoaasts
 
I think its more that the original article is not very forthcoming on the subject

A Berlin-based research scientist - ... you know, when the story already starts with "Berlin scientist" ... - advocates for only giving driver's licenses to men after they are 26 years old.
When the number of accidents caused by speeding doesn't go down, we need to have a talk on whether men should only get a driver's license after concluding their 26th year of life", traffic scientist Prof. Andreas Knie PhD (63, TU Berlin) told the broadcaster RBB. "There are old archaic structures behind this, as well as a long outdated masculinity craze which is acting out."
It's pretty clear in this paragraph what they mean. They're saying men under 26 cause the most accidents and should be restricted from driving. The insurance place where I live already kind of does that by charging drivers under 25 retardedly high insurance rates. Last time I got insurance it was $360. Dude in front of me was under 25 and it cost him over a grand for 3 months.
 
And that is the crucial point: They are trying to sell us a political agenda as science. We already know that from climate.

Or, in other words: The German "science", at least at the universities, isn't worth a damn. Especially not in Berlin.
It's just someone complaining about the clickbait comes from people trying to maintain their tenureship
 
It's pretty clear in this paragraph what they mean. They're saying men under 26 cause the most accidents and should be restricted from driving. The insurance place where I live already kind of does that by charging drivers under 25 retardedly high insurance rates. Last time I got insurance it was $360. Dude in front of me was under 25 and it cost him over a grand for 3 months.
Yeah, young drivers are already penalised with insurance. It’s daft to not let lads have a licence - you completely block job prospects for many roles that require you to drive. Most trades, lots of jobs that we need young people in.
The really terrible dangerous young drivers are skewed male, there’s no doubt on that, the boy racer stereotype is real. But what about a young man who needs to drive a van for work? It’s really unfair to target sensible and law abiding people to take out the badly behaving ones - certainly in the UK the terrible ones barely bother with licences and insurance anyway.

This is typical lefties targeting the PERSOn not the behaviour. Let insurance be at market rates and take licences away for speeding past a point (as in 75 in a 30 zone , not 73 on the motorway) target the behaviour
 
Mr Teuton let me ask you a simple question: How the fuck are boys aged 18-25 supposed to travel for work, move out of their moms basement, and even pursue women that may just live only 10 miles away without a car? Don't start with "muh public transportation" because not everyone in Germany lives in a bughive. Berlin isn't all of Germany. Is mommy going to drive them everywhere? Talk about infantilizing young adults.

The Eternal Teuton and their meddling have been a disaster for the human race. Restriction on movement is a restriction of freedom. If your going down the road of "well most fatal car accidents are caused by young men, therefore all young men should be punished" you need to keep that energy for other groups of people start deporting all refugees ASAP for the rapes.
 
Last edited:
Surely Dog-O-Tron is merely jesting
I mean, no way I did such a piss-poor job translating this thing that you could reasonably come to that conclusion unironically
... right? (:_(
I think that this part the headline confused people:
"

Driver's license for men only from 26 years up​

"
I thought that meant once people reach the age of 26, only men can have drivers' licenses.

"for men only" means nobody but men

I recommend "Driver's license restriction targeting men below the age of 26" because it makes it clear that these people are the subgroup, not the entire group.
 
My understanding is that this applies only to standard lead-acid batteries since they release hydrogen, am I mistaken? I can't remember seeing anything in the SDS for lithium ion battery banks but I will acknowledge I don't quite remember off hand
I have an antique auto with a trunk mounted lead-acid battery right behind the rear seat, and there's no seal between the trunk and interior. It has a tube to vent any hydrogen outgassing to the outside, and is perfectly safe given the tube is clear and free of leaks.

Don't have any experience with lithium-ion in a car application.
 
I think that this part the headline confused people:
"

Driver's license for men only from 26 years up​

"
I thought that meant once people reach the age of 26, only men can have drivers' licenses.

"for men only" means nobody but men

I recommend "Driver's license restriction targeting men below the age of 26" because it makes it clear that these people are the subgroup, not the entire group.
I changed the subtitle to "Berlin-based "traffic scientist" proposes no longer giving driver's licences to men age 25 and below", that should make it clear
 
Back