UN EU and US turn up the heat on Elon Musk over Twitter - EU commissioner warns billionaire he must adhere to the rules as Janet Yellen indicates Washington could review purchase

1669836618103.png
Thierry Breton told Elon Musk, pictured, that Twitter must adhere to a checklist of rules or face a Europe-wide ban or fines of up to 6% of global turnover © Dado Ruvic/Reueters

Javier Espinoza in Brussels, James Politi in Washington, Cristina Criddle in London and Hannah Murphy in San Francisco
44 MINUTES AGO

Elon Musk is under renewed pressure from the US and EU over his ownership of Twitter, as regulators clamp down on the billionaire’s push to transform the social network into a freewheeling haven of free speech.

The European Commission on Wednesday threatened Musk with a ban unless Twitter abides by strict content moderation rules, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen indicated that Washington was reviewing his purchase of the social network.

The warning from Brussels came in a video call between Musk and Thierry Breton, the EU’s commissioner in charge of implementing the bloc’s digital rules, according to people with knowledge of the conversation.

Breton told Musk that Twitter must adhere to a checklist of rules, including ditching an “arbitrary” approach to reinstating banned users, pursuing disinformation “aggressively” and agreeing to an “extensive independent audit” of the platform by next year.

Musk was warned that unless he stuck to those rules Twitter risked infringing the EU’s new Digital Services Act, a new law that sets the global standard for how Big Tech must police content on the internet. Breton reiterated Twitter could face a Europe-wide ban or fines of up to 6 per cent of global turnover if it breached the law.

Twitter’s owner said repeatedly that he thought that the DSA was “very sensible”, said people briefed on the conversation, adding that he had read the legislation and thought it should be applied everywhere in the world. Musk has previously said Twitter would adhere to all relevant laws.

Among the EU’s demands is that Musk provides clear criteria on which users are at risk of being banned. Musk has reinstated Donald Trump’s account after holding a poll of users on whether the former US president should be allowed to return to the site.

In a blog post, Twitter said that none of its policies had changed and that its trust and safety team remained “strong and well-resourced”, but added: “Our approach to policy enforcement will rely more heavily on de-amplification of violative content: freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.”

The company said it still sought to “promote and protect the public conversation” but that it had changed its “approach to experimentation” by undergoing more “public testing”.

Senior EU officials have expressed concerns over whether Twitter has enough staff to comply with the new rules after Musk fired more than half of its 7,500 workforce this month.

In the US, authorities’ scrutiny of Twitter appears to be focused on foreign ownership of the social media platform. In comments at a New York Times conference, Yellen mentioned the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US when asked about Twitter, saying it looked at transactions involving “foreign investment . . . to see if they create national security risk”.

The Treasury secretary added: “We don’t comment on work that’s in progress. But if there are such risks, it would be appropriate for Cfius to have a look.”

Securities filings show Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia rolled over 35mn shares, or 3.5 per cent of the total shares of the public Twitter, into the new private company as part of Musk’s $44bn buyout.

Kingdom Holding Company, an investment fund controlled by the prince, owns stakes in US companies, including Citigroup, Uber and Lyft, according to its website.

US president Joe Biden this month said Musk’s “co-operation” with other countries was “worthy of being looked at” by American authorities. While Yellen herself had previously dismissed the likelihood of such a probe, on Wednesday she said she had “misspoke”.

Additional reporting by Ian Johnston in London

Source (Archive)
 
Twitter definitely doesn't have free speech. Only a genuine lunatic would consider Musk a champion of free speech. But right now it serves him very well to be a voice in opposition to the establishment, which he is obviously playing to the hilt. It's just a matter of time before that position changes, though.

Remember, it took him all of four days to breathlessly reassure the gub'mint (which he entirely relies on for massive and constant bailouts of all his failed companies) that he was committed to combating election fraud misinformation on Twitter.
 
including Citigroup, Uber and Lyft, according to its website.

Of ALL the four, Twitter, Citigroup, Uber, & Lyft, only Citigroup is the one that National Security makes any sense about.

How is Twitter "National Security" when it's a shitposting app?

The fact that the Dems are mad Elon pissed all over their hugbox will never cease to be hilarious.

And he needs to tell the Eurocucks to go fuck themselves. They want total control, they can make EUTwitter or some lame ass shit.
 
Daily Mail version of the story: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...rns-says-Musks-Twitter-deal-investigated.html
Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/MRvLm

Highlights:

Biden's Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen U-turns and says Musk's Twitter deal SHOULD be investigated​

Janet Yellen on Wednesday reversed comments saying she saw no reason for a review of Musk's takeover of Twitter, saying it should be probed if his ownership raised national security concerns​
By Rob Crilly​
  • 'Let me clarify. I misspoke,' Janet Yellen told a New York audience on Wednesday
  • It comes after she said she saw 'no basis' for a review of Musk's Twitter deal
  • Lawmakers have raised concerns about the role of foreign owners
  • Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abudlaziz of Saudi Arabia put up $1.9 billion
  • On Wednesday, Yellen hinted that the U.S. government is reviewing the deal
  • She said the Treasury had a unit to assess national security impacts
Good lord she an old bat. I wish the old farts would just go away already.
1669839148457.png
 
Last edited:
Of ALL the four, Twitter, Citigroup, Uber, & Lyft, only Citigroup is the one that National Security makes any sense about.

How is Twitter "National Security" when it's a shitposting app?

The fact that the Dems are mad Elon pissed all over their hugbox will never cease to be hilarious.

And he needs to tell the Eurocucks to go fuck themselves. They want total control, they can make EUTwitter or some lame ass shit.
The control of the flow and shape of information is of the utmost priority when it comes to national security.
 
Twitter is a US company is it not? The US government is, despite all the huffing and puffing, totally impotent in this regard. If current political ghouls really are so far out of touch with constitutional and legal standards, then let them look stupid the hard way. The courts, doing something even remotely recognizable as sane, won't even need the SC to BTFO any attempt to limit speech. They can't even threaten regulatory wink-wink retaliation or other such wankery since the courts and SC have over the years, made such things or pressure, quite explicitly illegal!
 
Last edited:
How is Twitter "National Security" when it's a shitposting app?
Because the government used it as a way to manipulate people and help their "revolutions" in certain countries (remember the young 7 year-old live-tweeting from Syria with a perfect english?). It scares them that they don't have a backdoor anymore.
 
Mastodon is a european creation so they use it as their hugbox with Gargon happily playing Stasi member.
 
This is Thierry, the EU Commisar who threatened Elon Musk with disabling Europeans' access to Twatter forcing Europeans to use VPNs and Tor to access Twatter just like the Russians are now doing in Russia to access Western media.
Just looking at him, you can tell he doesn't have even pea-sized testicles.
 
Back