FARK.com - Dead gay website filled with Moviebobs, Bizzaroworld A&N

Randall Fragg

Tran Ranch is under siege!
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
FARK was originally launched in 1999 by Drew Curtis as a news aggregate and social networking site. It was originally intended as a "weird news" site, and still is to some extent.
The problem is the Politics Tab.
The Politics tab of the site has become increasingly partisan and circlejerky. I created this thread because of the clusterfuck that is this thread: http://www.fark.com/comments/903468...ent-whereabouts-unknown?startid=101164664#new
qro2VW6.png
JN3X1ys.png
ZJwVRWk.png
mjwYcJW.png
This is from one page. And this kind of sheer groupthink and vitriol is common in just about any thread in the Politics section.
I think FARK is prime territory to obtain laughs, either from the angry commentators whining about how anyone with views that don't align with theirs are crossburning gun clutching hicks, or by trolling said angry commentators.
http://www.fark.com/politics/
 
Too easily triggered, smells of irony.

5735308172197888.png


Also great timing @Ass Manager 3000

Somebody sounds very triggered

There's pages and pages of fark salt about someone who by a function of being dead cannot effect their agenda anymore.

I like to think that old fat fuck is laughing his ass off wherever he may be. Even Scalia's death left his political opponents frothing at the mouth with rage :lol:
 
The Politics tab of the site has become increasingly partisan and circlejerky. I created this thread because of the clusterfuck that is this thread: http://www.fark.com/comments/903468...ent-whereabouts-unknown?startid=101164664#new

Note: Scalia was not a "strict constructionist." Nobody of that description is on the Court.

"Textualism should not be confused with so-called strict constructionism, which is a degraded form of textualism that brings the whole philosophy into disrepute. I am not a strict constructionist, and no one ought to be- though better that, I suppose, than a nontextualist. A text should not be construed strictly, and it should not be construed leniently; it should be construed reasonably, to contain all that it fairly means."

To claim to be a "strict constructionist" as a judge is to claim to be literally a moron. It is not a term used by anyone who knows what they're talking about.
 
Difference between FARK's decline into A-Loggy liberalism and SomethingAwful's decline into cuckery is at least four or five regulars on SomethingAwful tried not to shit a thread up; the only exception (not correlating to discussion) being they grew a spine eventually and left for better discussion boards. Optimistic as that may be, FARK's situation will never be funny in any context. At least; no one on FARK will ever tune in with a little less sanctimoniously.

Question my humor, if you must, call it salt for SA going to shit, but I find nothing about Fark's discussion boards quality.

Also FARK's political commentators are no different than Tech Blog cucks.
 
Last edited:
Fark is also a haven for bronies and they got on way early on the 'respect pronouns, shitlord!' bandwagon.

It's pretty hilarious that Drew Curtis is a hardcore conservative but his base of liberal assholes ran off every single conservatives on the site by shitpiling on them constantly. Wrongthink there is dealt with with tons of salt its pretty hilarious/sad.
 
Back