Fascism Or Tranny Supremacy redux (due to mod faggotry) - If these were the only choices, how would you vote?

[Sumptinsfuckey]

So apparently I wasnt nuero divergent enough to put the original in peraxctly the right place to satisfy the mods.

So here's the scenario, the only two outcomes are that you either vote for a literal fascist regime, at least similar to Fascist italy, though possibly full on Nazi, you don't kniw which; or you vote for a Teanny Supremacy regime in which public school emoyees/public health workers/social workers can order children to undergo hormonal and surgical "gender affirming treatments" and all citizens are required to treat people according to thier "gender identity" in all ways, including in intetpersonal interactions, or face felony charges.

Sadly I can't put up a poll for sone reason. So cast your vote below.

 

[Owner of a Lonely Hole]

Nah.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Great, yet another election with no real choices from the two major parties.

 

[ita]

there is literally no difference between those options

 

[Sumptinsfuckey]

Im genuinely confused by you folks saying theres no difference. The Nazi were sexusl deviants, but so far as I know they never transitioned any children.

 

[Fapcop]

Let’s see…

Fascists: Free youth organization with camaraderie and youth camps. Kids are taught useful life skills, self discipline and go camping.

Trannies: Cultists grooming children online. Kids are taught anal sex, how to lie to their parents and to take hormones and puberty blockers.

Yeah, it’s fascists all the way for me.

 

[Die Oberste Direktive]

Im genuinely confused by you folks saying theres no difference. The Nazi were sexusl deviants, but so far as I know they never transitioned any children.

They transitioned those jew kids into ash.

 

[doodoocaca]

Here's what I'd do, OP:

Spoiler: spoilered for size

 

[Sumptinsfuckey]

Here's what I'd do, OP:

Spoiler: spoilered for size

View attachment 4941028

Voteing for tranny's. Notef

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Im genuinely confused by you folks saying theres no difference. The Nazi were sexusl deviants, but so far as I know they never transitioned any children.

Personally, I'm somewhat against being enlisted at gunpoint into some kind of collective "spiritual mission" by a totalitarian state that doesn't even allow for the conception of any dissent.

The fascists were faggots too:





Same faggot shit the troons want for their fetishes.

 

[Sumptinsfuckey]

Personally, I'm somewhat against being enlisted at gunpoint into some kind of collective "spiritual mission" by a totalitarian state that doesn't even allow for the conception of any dissent.

The fascists were faggots too:
View attachment 4941044
View attachment 4941060
View attachment 4941068
View attachment 4941108

Same faggot shit the troons want for their fetishes.

So then there is a difference between the two, even if it's only which fetishes are mandated.

 

[malleusmaleficarum]

i vote for fascism because then right wing death squads could clean up the mess

 

[0 0]

A second mod who doesn't oversee this forum directed me to this thread specifically to give you a pink triangle.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

you either vote for a literal fascist regime, at least similar to Fascist italy, though possibly full on Nazi

Can Nazism really be considered a 'next level' form of Fascism when they don't even share the same economic or racial policies?

In any case, both of these options suck.

 

[Sumptinsfuckey]

A second mod who doesn't oversee this forum directed me to this thread specifically to give you a pink triangle.

Tell him thank you, but I still dont swing his way.

They like me, they really like me!

Can Nazism really be considered a 'next level' form of Fascism when they don't even share the same economic or racial policies?

In any case, both of these options suck.

They do share the same economic policies.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

They do share the same economic policies.

No they don't, one is syndicalist and the other is socialist.

 

[Sumptinsfuckey]

No they don't, one is syndicalist and the other is socialist.

Syndicalism was a tool of socialists, that's like saying tractors and farming have nothing to do with each other. Are you retarded?

 

[WelfareNiggerQueen]

Fascism. It's like Monarchism but without the royal titles. The issue being that you likely won't get Supreme leader Giga Chad and will be choosing Supreme leader Nega Virgin who actively works to make everyone's life more miserable like he's King Henry the 8th or a Communist. If you're going to push for a totalitarian state make sure the guy in charge is Chad and not Virgin or a gaggle fuck of Virgins, everything is better when Chad is in charge since people will actually die for him to keep a gaggle fuck of virgin's from overthrowing his reign in the name of Diversity, Inclusion, Equity, and Democracy™.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Syndicalism was a tool of socialists, that's like saying tractors and farming have nothing to do with each other. Are you retarded?

No, Syndicalism is a form of economic Corporatism, which has existed since antiquity. Fascist economics is a throwback to monarchy era economics where businesses are grouped into guilds and are allowed to run themselves so long as their activities benefit the state in some way, socialism is a top-down political control of businesses where employment, command structure & business purpose is organized by the state directly. This is why Fascism is referred to as third way economics, because it's neither socialist nor capitalist.

 

[Sumptinsfuckey]

O.K. tard.