Fluffies - Brony erotica about tortured, mentally retarded pony foal

Status
Not open for further replies.
I do wish some of our Kiwi artists would draw the fluffies one upping their "parents". These people are the ones the jacked off to the thought of Sylvester dismembering Tweety and Tom eating jerry. All you gotta do is the follow the rules of the old cartoons.Have the Fluffies be so stupid that it saves them from death. I don't know if it'll cause alot of anger in these freaks but some of them see the tortures as stand ins for themselves so the feeling of them getting beaten and even killed by a retarded small horse will rustle their jimmies
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Adamska, Cosmos, Roosechu and 17 others
Even before I knew about this image site fetish crime against humanity in the form of a website, Fluffies just... didn't sit well with be. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a fan of the show, and fans of Flufflepuff always seemed off. I always thought the whole Fluffies thing was stupid and overly-cutesy, so I just figured it was no more than a dumb fad that attracted dumb people. I can't say anything about how messed up it is without repeating what someone else already said, but I can add this. There is something so obviously wrong with Fluffies that, even from the standpoint of a Brony, Fluffies have always radiated autism.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Tokitae, Count groudon, Luvs2Sperg789 and 4 others
Oh good, I was hoping some retard would bump this thread by defending their idiocy so we could talk at greater length about the ethical merits of depicting torture porn of small children mentally challenged ponies.

Question: better or worse than Nick Bate?
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Adamska, Roosechu, dead76 and 2 others
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
Oh good, I was hoping some exceptional individual would bump this thread by defending their idiocy so we could talk at greater length about the ethical merits of depicting torture porn of small children mentally challenged ponies.

Question: better or worse than Nick Bate?
Click to expand...
I'd say on the same level- Both are fucking disgusting and should be torched immediately.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Roosechu, Bernard, Jaimas and 3 others
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
Oh good, I was hoping some exceptional individual would bump this thread by defending their idiocy so we could talk at greater length about the ethical merits of depicting torture porn of small children mentally challenged ponies.

Question: better or worse than Nick Bate?
Click to expand...

Hey, you know, that's true, I'd like them to try defending this:

958 - boy_love explicit homosexual kmeb lolwtf pegleg puffin special_huggies special_hugs.JPG

Gay fluffy porn found here! It's all in good autism, but up the ante:

960.JPG

Fucking eh' rights bud? But then again, it seems...

durrrrr.png


Oh lord.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
Reactions: yasscat, Cosmos, dead76 and 12 others
Bork Laser said:
I do wish some of our Kiwi artists would draw the fluffies one upping their "parents". These people are the ones the jacked off to the thought of Sylvester dismembering Tweety and Tom eating jerry. All you gotta do is the follow the rules of the old cartoons.Have the Fluffies be so stupid that it saves them from death. I don't know if it'll cause alot of anger in these freaks but some of them see the tortures as stand ins for themselves so the feeling of them getting beaten and even killed by a retarded small horse will rustle their jimmies
Click to expand...
Y'know, I suspect that it'd piss them off, but they'd still jerk it to it anyway. Like, hate jerk.

When someone reaches a certain level of fucked-up-ness, is it even possible to offend them? Or perhaps I'm just being pessimistic.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Cosmos, dead76, GREEDY FIREMAN and 8 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back