EU From Climate to Feminism, Germany’s First Security Strategy Casts Wide Net - Chancellor Scholz says Germany won’t just boost military spending but also put security at the center of all policy decisions

https://archive.ph/vWRF3 / WSJ (paywall)


BERLIN—As war rages on NATO’s eastern edge, Germany’s new national security strategy focuses not just on more military spending but on climate change and feminism.

The 76-page document, the first such government strategy in Germany’s post-World War II history, marks Berlin’s response to mounting global threats, from armed conflicts and pandemics to broken supply chains and cyber espionage.

“It is not just about defense and the army,” Chancellor Olaf Scholz said Wednesday. “It marks the start of a process that will see government, business and society cooperate to strengthen our security.”

The paper is the latest evidence of a broader effort in Europe’s largest economy to put security at the center of policy making, making the country less vulnerable to adversaries and more resilient in the event of disasters.

Work on the strategy predates Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine last year, but the attack, which caught Berlin largely unprepared, gave the initiative considerably more urgency. The war cast light on Germany’s depleted military after years of underinvestment and highlighted its dangerous reliance on Russian energy supplies and global trade flows.

Before the attack, Russia accounted for more than half of German natural gas imports and Germany’s largest gas storage facility was owned by Russian state-controlled giant Gazprom. As Russia began to throttle supplies, Berlin rushed to buy expensive liquefied natural gas from others, contributing to a spike in energy prices.

Thanks to the measures outlined in the strategy, future governments would make sure such situations never occurred again, Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said.

Billing itself as an “integrated security strategy,” the paper encompasses concrete measures not just to diversify raw material supplies, build national food, medicine and energy reserves and improve cyber defenses, but also to combat climate change, promote biodiversity and better target development aid.

“Our security is linked to the security and stability of other regions of the world,” the document states. “The government will pay special attention to the interests of women and disadvantaged groups as part of its feminist foreign and development policies.”
Security also meant reassuring citizens that their private communications weren’t being spied on by China or that the water they used was monitored for safety, Baerbock said.

On defense, the strategy repeats Germany’s commitment to raise spending to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s target of 2% of gross domestic product a year. Last year, Germany spent 1.5% of its GDP on defense.

A €100 billion, equivalent to $108 billion, five-year special defense fund created just after Russia’s attack should help the government reach the goal in the short term. But based on current spending trends, the Cologne-based German Economic Institute forecast in December that Berlin would fall back under the 2% target from 2026.

Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said the strategy encompassed lessons from the conflict in Ukraine, for instance, stressing the need to expand and strengthen Germany’s air defenses. Berlin has supplied Ukraine with the sophisticated IRIS-T antiaircraft system, a weapon it hasn’t deployed at home because of its high cost.

Disagreements in Scholz’s three-party ruling coalition delayed the publication of the strategy, which is missing some measures envisaged at the outset.

Negotiators abandoned a plan to create a National Security Council modeled on its U.S. equivalent after the Foreign Ministry and the chancellery clashed over who would have final authority over the structure, officials said. A discussion about developing a capacity to strike back against cyberattacks was also dropped after the Justice Ministry objected, they added.

Work on a separate China policy document has been slow because of tensions between Scholz, who favors continuing engagement with China, and the more hard-line Greens around Baerbock. Asked about it on Wednesday, Scholz said the paper would be published “when it is ready.”
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Markass the Worst
Does the reference to feminism in national security strategy have something to do with incels? Apparently not:
“Our security is linked to the security and stability of other regions of the world,” the document states. “The government will pay special attention to the interests of women and disadvantaged groups as part of its feminist foreign and development policies.”
German World Police
 
These are policies of a dying state. If anyone's been curious what fall of Rome may have looked like, we are living it. Which means, right around the corner is a brand new dark age. One of outright censorship and the further dumbing down of the populace as the state fails to maintain itself.

German World Police
Doesn't have the same ring as Team America World Police.
 
Deutschland, how can you be the world police when you're getting little bro-d' militarily by Poland, and your supposed right-wing parties are surging because your polizei force is too busy shoving their nose into people making mean comments online and making muslims try to like gay stuff?
 
Reopen your nuke plants, vastly increase your air defense net, replace and double your tank fleet, and good lord, start offshore drilling of natural gas and oil you hippie faggots
Double their tank fleet? So they can field two companies of Leopards and not just one? You're horribly unaware of just how horrendously the Germans gutted their military since they figured the Russians were too busy selling gas to get up to no good and that Uncle Sam would just take care of everything else, leaving the Germans free to moralize and finger-wag about American militarism.
 
Double their tank fleet? So they can field two companies of Leopards and not just one? You're horribly unaware of just how horrendously the Germans gutted their military since they figured the Russians were too busy selling gas to get up to no good and that Uncle Sam would just take care of everything else, leaving the Germans free to moralize and finger-wag about American militarism.
Oh I am FULLY AWARE that post cold War they sold off every thing. I'm saying this as a start. Poland is doing what they should be. They need to increase everything, from scout vehicles, attack helicopters, artillery, IFV's- possibly buying a cheaper model to bulk things out, and vastly increase their small arms. Only then will I START to consider them uncucked
 
BERLIN—As war rages on NATO’s eastern edge, Germany’s new national security strategy focuses not just on more military spending but on climate change and feminism.
I'm lost, how do the last two help "national security"?
Thanks to the measures outlined in the strategy, future governments would make sure such situations never occurred again, Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said.

Billing itself as an “integrated security strategy,” the paper encompasses concrete measures not just to diversify raw material supplies, build national food, medicine and energy reserves and improve cyber defenses, but also to combat climate change, promote biodiversity and better target development aid.
Okay, so they didn't learn. The problem, Germany, was the lack of self-sufficiency. You are as much of a slave to the Russians as you are to whomever is the leader of your new "diversif[ied] raw material" sources. Building reserves isn't a solution either, build infrastructure to have that made domestically. That said, I'm still not sure how climate change and biodiversity helps ensure "national security".
On defense, the strategy repeats Germany’s commitment to raise spending to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s target of 2% of gross domestic product a year. Last year, Germany spent 1.5% of its GDP on defense.
Don't worry guys, NATO is still not just a method to fuck over Americans (and turn every conflict into a world war), and so after around 2 decades of not fulfilling our side of the contract, we totally will now!
 
I checked a few German news outlets and none is reporting about this 76 pages document.
some did, but its not worth the paper its printed on.


Okay, so they didn't learn. The problem, Germany, was the lack of self-sufficiency. You are as much of a slave to the Russians as you are to whomever is the leader of your new "diversif[ied] raw material" sources. Building reserves isn't a solution either, build infrastructure to have that made domestically. That said, I'm still not sure how climate change and biodiversity helps ensure "national security".
well there arent enogh raw materials in the german sphere and nothing will change that. green energy makes alot of sense for germany, but not like its done right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
Oh I am FULLY AWARE that post cold War they sold off every thing. I'm saying this as a start. Poland is doing what they should be. They need to increase everything, from scout vehicles, attack helicopters, artillery, IFV's- possibly buying a cheaper model to bulk things out, and vastly increase their small arms. Only then will I START to consider them uncucked
Scientists are more likely to genetically engineer a flying pig for the lols than for Germany to uncuck itself.
 
Back