🐱 From Gamergate to AmberTurd: The alt-right is hijacking the Depp v Heard trial

CatParty

In 2014, games developer Zoe Quinn was accused by their ex-partner, Eron Gjoni, of sleeping with a journalist to get a good review. The claim, which formed part of a ten thousand word manifesto, was completely untrue – the review in question does not even exist – but the outpouring of hate at Quinn was swift and vicious.

Male gamers, seeing an opportunity to reclaim “their” territory from feminists, attacked Quinn and other female gamers online, doxxing them and sending repeated rape and death threats. The year of hate which followed became known as GamerGate and was quickly co-opted by the alt-right to promote anti-feminist rhetoric.

We are seeing a similar kind of coordinated campaign now against Amber Heard and her supporters, in her ongoing trial against Johnny Depp. From popular hashtags to the creation of memes and misinformation, the anti-Amber train has been expertly commandeered by the alt-right.

The case itself is complicated. In court, the outcome ultimately rests on whether or not Heard committed defamation in a 2016 op-ed (in which Depp was not named). None of which appears to matter to those whose support for Depp includes attacking Heard online. As well as negative and abusive hashtags, there have also been coordinated attacks on those who have testified on her behalf, with users leaving fake negative reviews for mental health professionals including David Spiegel, who took to the stand this week.

This coordinated anger against Amber Heard has also been taken up by some publications. Website The Daily Wire spent thousands of dollars on Facebook ads, while Fox News, published an article using the tweets of a GamerGate proponent that was mocking Heard’s appearance. Coverage of the case by alt-right pundits has primarily focused on Heard as the woman who (supposedly) broke the #MeToo movement.

It is being treated by both media outlets and alt-right trolls as the ultimate “gotcha” – forcing the left to admit they supposedly were wrong, that all feminists are liars and that men can be victims of domestic too. This narrative has gripped the consciousness of left and rightwing commentators alike. Content creators who earlier posted in support of BLM, pride and other progressive causes are now sharing #MenToo and #DontBelieveAllWomen hashtags more commonly seen in misogynistic discourse favoured by the alt-right and Incel users. TikTokers whose output includes support of trans-rights, are sharing Ben Shapiro videos, while Candace Owens’ anti-Amber tweets have spawned hundreds of “I can’t believe I’m agreeing with her” replies.

To understand why, we need to understand the alt-right and their formula for viral success. They pick a complicated issue, oversimplify it to the extreme, and claim to have the most balanced take. In the case of Depp Vs Heard, this has involved them claiming we should “believe the facts”, as though all previous cases of violence against women have been decided purely on the basis that a woman reported them.

In truth, nobody ever doubted that women are capable of domestic violence (although in far lower numbers than men). The #BelieveAllWomen hashtag never meant “regardless of evidence to the contrary” in the same way that “Black Lives Matter” did not mean “more than all other lives”. By deliberately misrepresenting this, and encouraging social media users to use the #DontBelieveAllWomen and #MenToo tags, the alt-right are trying to dismantle the MeToo movement, blaming it on Amber Heard, and gaining support from people who previously disagreed with them.


Some TikTokers have found themselves saying they are “not anti-feminist, [just] anti-Amber Heard”. Others have attempted to justify their choices by including phrases such as “even whiney transphobe Ben Shapiro agrees with me”. But this does nothing to limit the spread of misogyny on platforms already teeming with anti-women sentiment.

Likewise, while I do not believe many of these people have suddenly joined the alt-right, but such messages are being received by those on the alt-right and being used to try and silence female victims.

This goes to the heart of every hot-potato issue that the alt-right touches. Their goal is not to support Depp or his fans, but to promote their growth, and reach new people by attaching themselves to any issue getting public attention.

For the trolls and incels – anything that adds to their goal of making women more afraid to speak out is welcomed. But others who have become more aligned with the alt-right may find themselves at the mercy of the same followers in future, and the overall effect on women’s rights could be catastrophic.
 
In truth, nobody ever doubted that women are capable of domestic violence (although in far lower numbers than men). The #BelieveAllWomen hashtag never meant “regardless of evidence to the contrary” in the same way that “Black Lives Matter” did not mean “more than all other lives”.
Don't piss on me and tell me it's raining.
 
>gamergate
849.jpg
Can't believe this meme was a prophecy
 
why does the UK have such a fucking hard on for Heard? a lot of these articles are from UK websites. That bitch is an american abuser, why the fuck do they care?
The eternal Anglo is a simp by nature. It is his instinct to kiss the hand that strikes him.

Instead of Stockholm Syndrome, it should be called London Syndrome.
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/voice...rrorist-misogynistic-extremists-b1903237.html

Thursday night was strange in the most mundane ways. My partner’s phone beeped (he ignored it) and I received a Facebook message from a friend I’ve not spoken to in a while. She sent me a link to local news, reporting a shooting in progress just down the road. As I read through the updates (shots fired, police called, no new info), my partner responded to messages from family checking we were alright.

The next two hours were spent poring over news and social media apps to find out what had happened. Rumours were moving faster than the truth and everyone was worried. Local news posts drowned under thousands of comments as everyone vented their frustrations online.


By 9pm it was over. A man with a gun had shot five people and was now dead. The details were not officially confirmed until Friday morning, but we already knew his name thanks to the terrified friends of friends who had seen him on their street. Jake Davison was 22-years-old, worked locally and made YouTube videos about the unfairness of being single.


The world according to Davison was awash with cruel, avaricious women who didn’t care about “that little autistic maths genius kid in the corner”. To him, his lack of success in relationships was all down to his lack of looks and money.

Mass shootings in the UK are thankfully rare but Davison’s ideology is frustratingly familiar. Known as Incels (involuntarily celibate), young men like Davison have colonised the dark corners of the web for years to mutter and plot against the women who reject them.

As with a lot of what happens online, it’s easy to dismiss our concerns as melodramatic. It’s the way that many members of Incel forums attempt to portray themselves; easier by far to congregate and rage if half the world thinks of you as harmless shut-ins. There is also an element of projection; they are merely venting frustrations, it’s the rest of the world that’s wrong for demonising them.


Primarily right-wing, their speech patterns echo those of the Alt-Right. Those who oppose them are easily offended “snowflakes”, ”cucks” or “libtards”. In place of woke, their preferred insult is Femoid and women’s selfish refusal to find their simmering rage and social ineptitude attractive, is framed as a left-wing plot to render “sub-par men” (their phrase) obsolete.

As with much of the Alt-Right movement, having run out of valid arguments against the Left, they blame a lack of traditional societal roles. Mostly atheists, their idea of traditional society appears to date from somewhere around 35BC.

If they had their way, women would be removed from their parents aged twelve and placed into a lottery. Forced to submit to whichever man “won” them, relationships would then be fair and no man need go without. Sex is viewed as a human right and women failing to provide it is cruelty of the highest order.

For those who don’t spend their lives online, the concept of Incel can be hard to grasp. How these lonely men have mobilised to the point of mass shootings is equally hard to get our heads around. Writ simply, they have been radicalised.


Men and boys, lacking self-esteem join these groups to find friends. By wallowing in their collective self-pity they feel accepted and important. Unfortunately, many of them also lack empathy and rather than boosting one another, it becomes a race to the bottom.

For the long-term group members, this comes down to one thing – believing that women are the root of all their ills. To be taken seriously and accepted, you have to parrot the party line and declare your seething hatred of any and all women. The more extreme your expression of hatred, the better.

In my time within these groups, I have seen men claim they want to impregnate a woman just to leave her and ruin her life. I have seen rape advocated as a valid punishment and femicide celebrated as the ultimate act. Elliot Rodger and Anders Breivik are revered figures; they actually did what many fantasise about.

As nihilists, these men do not believe that anything awaits them after death. There are no harps, no wings and no salvation-only the satisfaction of knowing they will be remembered by their peers. That somebody will see.
They do not care if we hate them and do not seek our approval. The only way to deal with them is to approach it like any other case of radicalisation and remove our sons from the equation. By connecting to our children when they are lost and working through their problems with them, we lessen the grip of a group whose aim is to become their only friend.

Nothing can excuse the behaviour of men like Rodgers and Davison, but we can try to understand it. In doing so we give ourselves the tools to fight this misogynistic extremism and to tackle the externalisation of personal problems by which it is characterised. Women are not (and have never been) to blame for male violence. It is time for those in positions of power to stand up and say as much.

Same retard energy
 
it doesnt. Depp sued one of the top 2 british newspapers and lost.
he would have had much better chances if he had sued some joke paper like the independent or the guardian.
>some joke paper
He literally sued the sun, there's no bigger joke than that
And fact questions in the UK trial overlap with those in the US trial
 
Amber's losing the trial and #BelieveWomen loses another maggot infested peg leg to stand on. There's nothing Alt-Right about watching some nasty woman try to drag an ex-drug addict through the mud and laughing at her failing.

Also, consider the following, Depp's performances were either memorable or even inspiring to kids who are now shitposting adults. Biases exist, there's no conspiracy.
 
If Depp wins in the US it will make their court system look like a fucking joke which it is
Depp lost that case because no way to prove that the Sun knew what Heard posted was bullshit. UK courts are a joke but him losing that case was the right out come and it was a dumb move to even try to sue them before his US trial, least then could go after them for not redacting the article.
 
Back