Gary Mosher / Gary "Inmendham" / Inmendham / InMendam / DoNotGod / DraftScience - Creator of "EFILism", Anti-Natalist, Philosopher, Physicist

[Breadbassket]

Gary Mosher (known generally as Inmendham) is a 60-something year old American man with a long-history on the Internet. According to himself he made his first website in 2000. At one point he made his second for a town he lived in but it was ultimately abandoned due to a dispute. He has been uploading videos to Youtube for a long time, at least since 2008. Primarily this has been done on the Inmendham channel but he has a number of others as well. He has been in numerous feuds with other Youtubers such as Brett Keane, TheAmazingAtheist (TJ Kirk) and Thunderf00t. A believer in anti-natalism, he chose to distance himself from the label in 2010 and came up with the Efilism, or "life" spelled backwards to more accurately describe his belief that there is pointless waste of suffering in all living conditions not just the human condition.

Here is a video showing what you can expect from him:

EFILism
His anti-natalist ideas are based in large part on evolutionary biology , atheism , and psychology . Life originates in DNA, the self-replicator, which evolved the nervous system and feeling structures 500 million years ago. This inevitably became the cause of creating a world full of suffering

Inmendham describes the philosophy in his own words on his site EFILism.com:

Welcome to EFILism.com, the home page for the philosophy of EFILism, by The prolific Youtube Philosopher, Inmendham. Inmendham, (Also know as DoNotGod) who began producing thousands of videos for the internet in 2007, covers an enormous range of topics including, The Right To Die, education reform, animal rights, democracy, virtual reality, determinism, economics, physics, atheism and Antinatalism/EFILism. Antinatalism, and EFILism more specifically, is the belief that DNA, and the suffering of sentient consciousness on this planet, are the greatest problems in the universe, born of nothing but a wasteful, failed experiment of unintelligent design.

For whatever reason, the universe initiated, we don't know why there's something rather than nothing, but there is. The big bang occurred, and aberrant science ran amok. it was a mixing bowl, a chemistry set gone wild, with all the ingredients leaking into each other, commingling - lots of bad ingredients mixing badly. And then gravity and nuclear forces started tying matter into bigger and bigger pieces, forming stars and planets, and of course with them, Earth. And on Earth, energized atoms formed compounds, and after bouncing around for a few billion years, something happened. The universe, up until this point, was certainly violent, but benign - free of sentient creatures, and therefor free of suffering. But all that changed when the tragedy of abiogenesis occurred, and the first reproducing cell was produced. DNA, our one single ancestor, the seed of sentient print media. And so life arose in many mechanical forms, and eventually, life became conscious, we became sentient. And then, the most pitiless step in our evolution - to arrival of suffering, - The First Ouch. And this was truly, the beginning of ALL problems in the universe.

Life is crude forces in control of precious commodities, and human life is perpetuated only out of the blind, insane desires of our addicted psychologies. Why create need machines, who can never satisfy their desire without imposing unfulfilled desire on to something else? Life is an imposition, and the EFIList believes we should not have the right to create need for no need, and force another generation to play out the same tragic and tired Shakespearean snuff film. We can control exactly how much suffering and death exists on this planet, there is no suffering without sentience, and the best outcome for life on planet earth is extinction, through a collective act of non-procreation.

Throughout recorded time, the general subject of anti-procreation has popped up again and again in many different intensities and iterations, though none ever successfully taking hold of mass culture, or popular consciousness. In the past, there was the wisdom of Silenus, the thoughts of Abul 'Ala Al-Ma'arri, the religious Antinatalism of the Cathars, the famous German Philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, Emil Coiran, Peter Wessel Zapffe, and in more modern times, organizations like VHEMT. But for the most part, and most certainly before 2006, Antinatalism was very much solely the possession of philosophy professors, and enthusiasts of obscure intellectual ideas. However, with the arrival of the internet, and particularly within the last 5 years on Youtube, things have greatly changed. Though people like Inmendham had been discussing the topic of anti-procreation on Youtube for many years, the actual term, 'Antinatalism', and by extension, 'Antinatalist', were not yet known, and therefor the subject was rendered into a rather amorphous state, and lacked a sense of identity. But in 2011, with the correct vernacular finally obtained, Antinatalism, though still relatively obscure, received an explosion of interest among the most diverse spectrum of people in it's history, and soon, the Antinatalist community was born. This serge of Antinatalism on the internet, coupled as well with important contemporary works of academy philosophers, such as David Benetar's Better Never To Have Been: The Harm of Coming Into Existence, have paved what appears to be a bright future for the argument in favor of the end game.

Soon after Antinatalism's initial serge in interest however, Inmendham, noticed something fundamentally wrong with the philosophy, in it's then current state. generally, historical Antinatalism was a condemnation of solely human procreation, and was not informed by an understanding of evolution, abiogenesis, the fact that all sentient creatures are the products of a single DNA molecule, or that the worst suffering occurs in nature. And so that same year, EFILism was created.

EFIL is life spelled backwards. Life is Consumption, Reproduction, Addiction & Parasitism. It's C.R.A.P. We, as sentient feeling organisms, are the products of 4 billion years of the holocaust of evolution - it's not a good story, and it's not one worth continuing. EFILism is a conclusion, derived from an essesment of the full summation of the history of the reality of sentient life on Earth. It is the most important responsibility, of the only sentient species intelligent enough, to effectively manufacture a graceful exit strategy for life on planet earth. It is the responsibility of the Efilist, to enter into the battlefield of ideas with the rest of the human race, and try to the best of ones ability, to argue for an understanding of the truth and consequences of our circumstance on this planet. The most precious thing in the entire material universe, is the capacity for a consciousness to generate a sensation of horror and unpleasantness. For that is where all value in the universe is generated - in the consciousness of feeling, sensitive creatures.

Those are the ideas of EFILism in text form, but here are a few videos that show Inmendham expressing his beliefs and making threats in the process:
'We do really need to kill parents' - Inmendham

'Nothing has a right to life' -Inmendham

'So just shoot them' - Inmendham

You can do the most horrific act possible as long as it reduces overall suffering - Inmendham

Inmendham is believed to of had connections or at least inspired Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook School shooter and a individual who carbombed an IVF clinic in 2025.

Physics
Gary has another Youtube channel called DraftScience, on which he has posted many "science" videos.

Here is how he describes it:

draftScience on youtube : Somewhere around 2013 I started including some Physics arguments in my commentary regarding the nature of life on earth. In many ways the science of physics is just another under evidenced if not unevidenced religion. As many viewers didn't like the mixture of the content I made a separate YouTube channel and website to devote to arguments related to the weak logic applied to the facts by "scientists".

He also made a site called DraftPhysics.com to show off his work which honestly mostly consists of videos going against Wikipedia's definitions of scientific terms.

Here are a couple of his science videos:
wikipedia: the Silly Work page #1:

Physics is just a silly religion ...Gravity:

Pedophilia Accusations And Apologia
Gary has made a number of pedo allegations about his detractors and any other person disagree with him. While doing this, he himself has made a number of questionable statements.

Lawsuits and DMCAs
Inmendham has a history of taking legal action for whatever reason. He has gone against the town of Mendham and the state of New Jersey in the past though it's not certain how much success he had in such endeavors. DMCA claims have also been used to take down videos criticizing him which he justified due to his views on the legal principle of fair use.

Dissecting InMendham's DMCA Attacks (MIRROR!!!)

Inmendham also made a video criticizing a judge for apparently refusing him a day in court.

Coward Judge David Hittner #1: The DMCA is Void, useless law.

On top of everything else, Garyhad one of his channels taken down from Youtube due to false-DMCA claims and in an absurd turn of events the person who did this pretended to be him.

Other Videos
Inmendham spreading hate

'I am not opposed to nuking it' -Inmendham

Inmendham supporting wild animal breeding programs

Conclusion
Gary "Inmendham" Mosher is a prideful individual who says he is quite a few things be it a physicist or philosopher. He has said a number of outrageous and absurd things both of a violent and non-violent nature. This will most likely continue into the future. Although he only has slightly under 15,000 subscribers on his largest Youtube channel the man seems to have a small group of dedicated supporters who support his ideas and defend him.

This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.

---

Special thanks to @Brit Nips for helping make this thread possible by making a very informative post on Inmendham.

 

[%%%]

The first paragraph is duplicated. Also, there is a subreddit (r/efilism) where his followers congregate, iirc it's a more miresable version of r/antinatalism. Last time I was there, some guy was making compilations of animals getting mauled in nature / killed at factories with metal music.

 

[Breadbassket]

The first paragraph is duplicated. Also, there is a subreddit (r/efilism) where his followers congregate, iirc it's a more miresable version of r/antinatalism.

Had some technical issues initially posting the thread. I removed the duplicate paragraph and added all of the videos that were meant to go with everything when it first went up.

 

[Guest123]

longlegs

 

[Tablet County]

Wow this guy's just straight up evil. I never thought I'd say that about someone who wasn't a diddler but here we are.

 

[147573952589676412927]

So as far as I understand it, this guy is a part of the same spheres of influence as this person who blew up an IVF clinic today.

Thread 'Explosion at fertility clinic in Palm Springs, at least one dead'

May 17, 2025

Archive | Article

Emergency personnel are responding to an explosion near the American Reproductive Centers building in Palm Springs, California.
The incident has rattled homes and startled residents, part of the USA TODAY Network, reported. Some residents are reporting smoke and an odor, according to the outlet.
Palm Springs Police Department told the Desert Sun said the explosion at about 11 a.m. local time in downtown Palm Springs, which was felt as far as 2 miles away, appears to be a car explosion by the American Reproductive Centers clinic. Lt. William Hutchinson said...

• Hecate
• Replies: 539
• Forum: Articles & News

• 
• 
• 

 

[Rango Dango]

Efilism, or "life" spelled backwards

Chris Chan level of symbolism.

 

[Elite Kipchak]

>hates life
>doesn't kill self

 

[Relinquish]

This guy has a huge history of threatening to sue people on the Internet. @Breadbassket, you should check out his page on ED

 

[Breadbassket]

So as far as I understand it, this guy is a part of the same spheres of influence as this person who blew up an IVF clinic today.

Thread 'Explosion at fertility clinic in Palm Springs, at least one dead'

May 17, 2025

Archive | Article

Emergency personnel are responding to an explosion near the American Reproductive Centers building in Palm Springs, California.
The incident has rattled homes and startled residents, part of the USA TODAY Network, reported. Some residents are reporting smoke and an odor, according to the outlet.
Palm Springs Police Department told the Desert Sun said the explosion at about 11 a.m. local time in downtown Palm Springs, which was felt as far as 2 miles away, appears to be a car explosion by the American Reproductive Centers clinic. Lt. William Hutchinson said...

• Hecate
• Replies: 539
• Forum: Articles & News

• 
• 
• 

He is, Inmendham is mentioned on the website of the culprit and also made a video in response to it happening.

RE: The Bad IVF thing

Here are some of the top comments:

 

[Jace on ice]

Took me only two seconds to realize why this face in particular is the face of antinatilism.

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

I wish he wasn't born either.

 

[Dona Morte]

My first question.
Does he EVER wash?


Apparently.... he had more videos.

https://www.youtube.com/@efilism - Great channel for quick proof reference on Gary.

Oh boy. Seems like someone clipped Gary here advocating for NOT legislating already existing CSAM.
He also makes an argument about "benign rape".
Also seems like Gary himself likes to fling pedo accusation too.
Archive:

This guy needs his hard drives checked. Pronto. (The video description has the needed archives)

Freedom.

Posted on Oct 9 2009
Gary would regulate the internet off spammers, and but not already existing CP - no on regulating that.

Further topic of "anti-torture" Gary here says the life is a "torture" yet seems to think that CP (according to the thoughts outlined above) is NOT torture. He get's very angry about this person he is responding to not having a right to torture by advocating life.
Argues that the animals "are psychotic" and that the willingness to live is "psychotic".
Archive:
Jun 16, 2014

I also found a mirror channel:

https://www.youtube.com/@DNGStickam

(Gary is a toxic little cunt- so he should be taken in parts.)

 

[Breadbassket]

The first paragraph is duplicated. Also, there is a subreddit (r/efilism) where his followers congregate, iirc it's a more miresable version of r/antinatalism. Last time I was there, some guy was making compilations of animals getting mauled in nature / killed at factories with metal music.

r/efilism has been banned and now r/efilism2 exists.

This guy has a huge history of threatening to sue people on the Internet. @Breadbassket, you should check out his page on ED

Thanks for letting me know about this. A couple videos and links from the page have been added to the OP.

 

[I've Seen Some More Shit]

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

I'll say the same thing I say to all nihilists and extinctionists: You first.

 

[Lovely Kin]

Nigger wash your fucking hair. Bush would invade that shit for the amount of oil.

 

[147573952589676412927]

After exploring the topics rather heavily due to recent events, I genuinely wonder how much school shootings and other violent behavior was rooted in these types of ideologies. Apparently this guy is tied to sandyhook as well. Are we about to see a mainstream condemnation of these movements? Is it accurate to say that more recent violent events then we realize are tied to this nihilistic death cult? It's always interesting to me when a "new thing" that has been festering for years, decades even, is suddenly introduced to the majority of people all at once.

 

[Breadbassket]

After exploring the topics rather heavily due to recent events, I genuinely wonder how much school shootings and other violent behavior was rooted in these types of ideologies. Apparently this guy is tied to sandyhook as well. Are we about to see a mainstream condemnation of these movements? Is it accurate to say that more recent violent events then we realize are tied to this nihilistic death cult? It's always interesting to me when a "new thing" that has been festering for years, decades even, is suddenly introduced to the majority of people all at once.

Adam Lanza was well aware of Gary Inmendham and EFILism/Efilism and brought it up multiple time in the videos for his Youtube channel CulturalPhilistine.

Here are the times he references it in his Audio Recordings (PDF archive attached to this post):
From the video "Rambling vlogrant of a ruminative vagrant (Part 2/2)":

And I’m not saying that, um, we should encourage diversity and . . . I’m not saying
that we should segregate, because both intre-integration and segregation are nonsen-
sical. They’re just two systems under which culture prospers and we all lose. There’s
really no difference between them. This ties into what I used to, sort of, my prior think-
ing, I used to address the issue of language being cultural. Oh man, I hate language so
much, maybe I’ll talk about that later. But I used to address the problem of language
being cultural, by just saying, “Oh um, Esperan— worldwide implil-implementation of
Esperanto should solve that problem” it was such a trivial, um, way to deal with that,
because I wasn’t . . . all that, um, integration allows to happen is to — all that it does
is kill competing viruses while — to let one virus prosper. There’s really no difference
between integration and segregation, it’s just the propagation of culture under different
systems. And about language . . . oh man, I have a special place in my heart for language
because it’s the primary method by which cultural values are coerced onto other people.
And you can’t, it’s like the wheezing of someone with tuberculosis. It’s a symptom of
it, it’s also the method by which it propagates to other victims, and there’s nothing you
can do about it. You’re for — um, forever stuck with this, language, all these abstractions
. . . but here I’m going back into my, my anarcho-quasi— I should say quasi-anarcho-
primitivist ideology when really, it’s not culture that’s the problem, it’s value that’s the
problem. It’s the structure of value itself, it’s not only cultural value, it’s fler-feral value
too. It’s all a part of the same nonsense . . . and sort of similar, to the whole race deba-
cle, is the Efilists, um, even though I’m adamantly opposed to the structure of life, I
. . . I differ from the Efilists in several regards, and the main issue is their . . . um, they
invoke these cultural abstractions like rights and morality to further their ideology.
And, I’m not appealing to anything, I’ve recognized that there’s nothing transcendent
about my ideas, they’re just a consequence of the life I’ve lived, but it’s kind of like how
Jay Sender[?] said, there . . . there are so many people from different backgrounds who
come to the same conclusion about antinatalism, about the structure of life, it’s um
. . . ah, not appealing to anything, you can just look for yourself at the structure of life
and you can see, it’s — it’s just like how Gary says it’s, he says that, the simplest way,
it’s just a need that you did, it’s just a need that need not exist. And that’s all that life
is, and it’s so easy to see that. That you’re just, fulfilling these values which . . . there’s,
which have no reason to exist. And I don’t need to say it’s immoral[?] to fulfill that, I
just say . . . it’s ridiculous according to my own standards, and apparently the standards
of many other people. I mean I’m not really sure I can communicate this, maybe it’s
not even possible to communicate this, because of the structure of life. Because I can’t
free myself from value and still communicate that I hate value.

It’s my value which leads me to hating value. [sigh] And another thing about the
Efilists is that a lot of them seem to think, that is, eh, it’s, that it’s possible for there to
be . . . it’s possible for there to be an instance under which it would be a good idea to
propagate life, that if suffering were abolished tomorrow, that it would be okay to bring
new lives into the world or to live your current life. But I don’t really focus on suffering,
at least not directly I focus on really, value itself, that’s the problem. Even if there were
Paradise tomorrow, and there were no suffering forever in the future, I would still be
advocating this position because I . . . you can sum me up in one sentence: I have a ven-
detta against value. So instead of an Efilist I’m more of a . . . eulavist. Eh, I only oppose
life because life is the source of value and it’s value that I really hate. And, well, I guess
that just says it all: I have a vendetta against value. And I guess that’s a good place to
finish my video, I mean I basically support the Efilists because I do hate life and value,
but um . . . it’s just that I have several problems with them . . . and also the same applies
to Gary there are a lot of things I disagree with him about but listening to his rants are
kind of my idea of pornography. It’s just fun to listen to.

Oh, and speaking about pornography, if anyone comments on this video, I’m sure
that ninety percent of them will be about the whole “pedophilia” thing, and I just want
to emphasize I am not a pedophile, I don’t know any pedophiles, it’s just an academic
interest. And if any of you, eh, “pedo-phobic” um, inclined individuals want to comment
about this, I’d like to hear some unique arguments affirming the position that children
having sex is innately harmful, because it’s been a really long time since I’ve found a
unique argument advocating that position. So . . . if you can, try to add some of those
in the comments, but . . . um, until then, thanks for listening and maybe someday in
the future I’ll . . . I will definitely in the future make some videos about pedophilia and
elaborate on my position, but also someday in the future maybe I’ll add another one of
these rambling videos, depending on how well this comes out. I should listen to it and
probably think oh that, about myself, Oh that guy’s such a liar, just listen to his voice,
listening to his intonation, he’s obviously a pedophile! And who knows? . . . Maybe I am.

From the video "Cults and Culture":

The accusations about Efilism being cult-like are presented with the implication that
cults are irrational groups who propagate delusional values. I’m not going to be address-
ing Efilism in this video, I just want to speak about cults themselves. Cults generally
exhibit similar characteristics as outlined in ArchLord’s video. These include members
yielding to an unaccountable authority who controls their behavior, using various emo-
tionally and psychologically manipulative tactics to suppress dissent and modify the
behavior and beliefs of its members, demonization, and desolation for anyone who
goes against the values of the cult, along with a preoccupation with converting any-
one who might be receptive. And justifying any means necessary to further propagate
their ideology, including actions which are otherwise generally regarded as immoral.
Ostensibly, you start at a neutral perspective and observe a cult which exhibits
these behaviors. You ask, if their beliefs had any validity then why would they have
to resort to these underhanded tactics of manipulation? Why are cults like this? A
similar question to ask is why terrorists do what they do. More specifically, how their
activities can relate to the activities of governments. Governments have omnipresent
legal institutions and law enforcers which serve to force or intimidate people into not
behaving in ways which deviate from the fulfilment of their values. Terrorists need to
resort to attacks against civilians, kidnappings, assassinations, and other methods to
have the same effect.

Governments are able to project massive militaries with sophisticated equipment to
foster their interests. Terrorists have to resort to methods as seen in Mumbai in 2008.
Governments have educational institutions and regulations which can — which can
inculcate values and modify the behavior of its citizens, in ways which are consistent
with the fulfilment of the government’s values. Terrorists need to resort to methods
like propaganda of the deed and manifestos.

I recognize that there may be a semantical issue here, but just grant it. And govern-
ments have taxes and central banks, terrorists need to resort to burglary, counterfeiting
and money-laundering. I’m not trying to normatively justify terrorism; I’m just describ-
ing a difference in the operation of the two groups. If someone shares the values which
the dominant government promotes, then they are not neutral when the— when they
observe the activities of terrorists and dismiss the validity of their ideology because the
terrorists resort to tactics that the government would never use. Governments, already
being dominant, merely have no need to resort to the tactics of terrorists because they
are viewed with legitimacy and thus have their own more efficient tactics.

I suspect that most of you listening to this aren’t of the flag-waving persuasion, so
I’ll assume you understand that terrorists aren’t bad people who are jealous of happy
governments, and I’ll leave it at that. This dynamic applies to its fullest extent when per
taining to cults and culture, it can — it can be seen in the way that children are treated.
Children’s free wills are suppressed and annihilated in every conceivable manner in
all cultures, but I’ll just be speaking about this one.

A child’s associations, location and every action is subject to the will of the adults
around them, along with being manipulated into adopting those adults’ thoughts and
opinions. Children are forced into the institution of parenting through governments
which set up property rights over them. Parents’ rights is a euphemism for slaveholders’
rights. Perhaps I’ll elaborate on this in a future video, but the extremely concise story is
this: the disease of culture begins with the selective application of emotion to manip-
ulate children into behaving in culturally sanctioned ways. If the child’s be— child’s
behavior fulfills your values, you apply an affirming emotion, if the child’s behavior
deviates from the fulfilment of your values, you apply an antagonistic emotion.
This feral method is present in every interaction that children will have in the rest of
its life, but there is a more complex mechanism available. Once the child is old enough,
it becomes infected with language. It is primarily through this mechanism that cul-
tural values are transmitted. This is euphemistically referred to as “teaching,” as they
grow older children are progressively given more and more freedom, to the extent that
they’ll contribute more and more to the propagation of the dominant cultural values.

Some parents might say, “But I can allow children to flourish free from coercement,
so that they can become themselves,” or something like that. Sure, you might not teach
your child religion, but what are you going to do when you realize that your child isn’t
going to speak your language? Or that it doesn’t want to wear clothes? Or violates the
cultural system of property rights? And just, in general, isn’t abiding by the structure
of your society? It’s impossible to be an egalitarian parent because you will inevitably
coerce your child into behaving in ways which are within the culturally defined param-
eters. That is the entire purpose of children under any culture. You’re not doing your
children a favor by bringing them into existence, children exist solely for the propaga-
tion of the values of the adults who own them. Your culture has taught you language,
art, religion, rights, morality, your activities, cultural context for interactions, the eco-
nomic structure in which you live, innumerable compartmentalized meta-metaphysical
categories of everything imaginable. And do you think that you’re somehow a neutral
observer when you dismiss a cult for employing manipulative tactics?

Cults behave in that way because they are trying to subvert the dominant culture
and propagate their own cultural values. Dominant cultures do not have to resort to
cultish tactics because since they have the luxury of being viewed with legitimacy, they
have a monopoly on the most efficient mechanism of cultural infection, the raising of
children. Yes, the belief systems of all cults are completely delusional, but it has noth-
ing to do with their manipulative tactics. All cultural values are delusions which exist
entirely as a consequence of coercive impositions.

 

[LowlyPheasent]

After exploring the topics rather heavily due to recent events, I genuinely wonder how much school shootings and other violent behavior was rooted in these types of ideologies. Apparently this guy is tied to sandyhook as well. Are we about to see a mainstream condemnation of these movements? Is it accurate to say that more recent violent events then we realize are tied to this nihilistic death cult? It's always interesting to me when a "new thing" that has been festering for years, decades even, is suddenly introduced to the majority of people all at once.

They'll probably not talk about it or if "the other" talks about it the usual morons will defend it. The moment the narative wasn't what the press wants they drop stories like this. At least some people may bring it up though.