General GunTuber thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I don't really have an issue with the audio. For what type of videos he's doing, it's good enough. I don't think I've ever felt "that audio is bad", or very few times TBH.

That said, it's obviously stubbornness on Ian's part.
 
Archie_Kimkicker said:
I see one reply from a rando saying their manager sucks. Is there anything else? Either a troll or low-effort engagement farming op if not.
Click to expand...
Ivan, and others, are buttblasted about PSA not selling parts to part ban states and how PSA is dumb/bad for not 1) having lawyers reviewing state laws, 2) not allowing the social media rep to phone complaints up the chain of command; he also thinks the Twitter rep is disrespectful and cringe. Ivan has gynecomastia.
Lots of salt and it doesn't really matter, long back and forth that's difficult to archive.
 
HumptiDouji said:
There's no fucking way that's not a dude, look at the face.
Click to expand...

He has to be deleting any comments that refer to his being a man. Scanning the comment sections on a couple of videos, nobody was sceptical at all, let alone pointing out that this is an actual trap. Comments are 100% all in, insisting that this true and honest women is the hottest thing since sliced bread.

I know that some men just go stupid when they see an enormous pair of tits, but the idea that NOBODY is sceptical and NOBODY has reservations about getting aroused while watching a troon show off his ass is just really mysterious to me.
 
Glock 19 Gen 5 said:
Ivan, and others, are buttblasted about PSA not selling parts to part ban states and how PSA is dumb/bad for not 1) having lawyers reviewing state laws, 2) not allowing the social media rep to phone complaints up the chain of command; he also thinks the Twitter rep is disrespectful and cringe. Ivan has gynecomastia.
Lots of salt and it doesn't really matter, long back and forth that's difficult to archive.
Click to expand...
First butt blasted reply has "SERVICE DISABLE VETERAN OWNED" in his bio so lmaaoooooo
 
There are a LOT of manboobs in the fucking gun world that are preventable. Calorie deficit with a decent core-strengthening regimen (and modest cardio) could set things right.
 
Glock 19 Gen 5 said:
Ivan, and others, are buttblasted about PSA not selling parts to part ban states and how PSA is dumb/bad for not 1) having lawyers reviewing state laws, 2) not allowing the social media rep to phone complaints up the chain of command; he also thinks the Twitter rep is disrespectful and cringe. Ivan has gynecomastia.
Lots of salt and it doesn't really matter, long back and forth that's difficult to archive.
Click to expand...
Man, Hi-Point shit on him so hard that he's trying to hassle every gun company that bothers to listen.
 
Swole McPole said:
I know that some men just go stupid when they see an enormous pair of tits, but the idea that NOBODY is sceptical and NOBODY has reservations about getting aroused while watching a troon show off his ass is just really mysterious to me.
Click to expand...
I can understand Onlyfans types being fooled by some giant tits, but the voice is a dead give away IMO.

If that isn't a man trying to hide their real voice, then it has to be a fucking retard.
 
Bogliacci said:
When did Hi-Point shit on him?
Click to expand...
Had to go search for that, he's been mad at Hi-Point since 2021, eventually ramping up around Oct '23.

At first I wanted to be sympathetic towards Ivan, he lives in a shit state, is heavily involved in subverting gun control and creating 3D printed firearms from parts kits. But his zeal, which amounts to furiously xeeting and being on a podcast, comes across as impotent nagging. He's just annoying.
For instance, today, he's fallen back into what he does best... replying to retards on xitter about how the m16 is actually an ar15. It's an argument I agree with, but I enjoy the history of arms and other autistic minutia. These wine moms and other boomers don't, the distinction is without difference to them, written in the tone of your 5th grade science teacher. They also will never admit fault, so what's there to gain? Being right, I guess, but what that amounts to is arguing for hours (potentially over days) about shit that doesn't move the needle. No one with any power cares, it just comes off as impotent. He isn't trolling, he sincerely cares, a lot. Getting le heckin dope Ws against the antigun masses and getting ass-pats from other aspies on his side (many of whom are gross troons and lolbertarians). This sort of shit he does applies to his nagging at Hi-Point, PSA, etc.
 
Last edited:
Bogliacci said:
When did Hi-Point shit on him?
Click to expand...
Off-handed dismissal of his call for parts kits which led into outright ignoring him.
This is after he hyped up 3D printed Hi-Point frames which resulted in existing parts kits going for up to and more than actual Hi-Points.
 
WhoBusTank69 said:
Off-handed dismissal of his call for parts kits which led into outright ignoring him.
This is after he hyped up 3D printed Hi-Point frames which resulted in existing parts kits going for up to and more than actual Hi-Points.
Click to expand...
lmao. imagine paying a premium to print a shittier, shorter service life version of a off the shelf cheap shitty gun. the 3D printing firearms community continues to mystify me.
 
WhoBusTank69 said:
Off-handed dismissal of his call for parts kits which led into outright ignoring him.
This is after he hyped up 3D printed Hi-Point frames which resulted in existing parts kits going for up to and more than actual Hi-Points.
Click to expand...
I thought the goal of developing 3D printed guns was to make them less shit not intentionally shit lmao
 
Glock 19 Gen 5 said:
Ivan, and others, are buttblasted about PSA not selling parts to part ban states and how PSA is dumb/bad for not 1) having lawyers reviewing state laws,
Click to expand...
I'll wait for when Ivan deliberately ships his firearms across state lines to a ban state and then decides to duke it out with the ATF and a dozen other agencies or gets sued into oblivion. I'll be waiting.
 
WhoBusTank69 said:
Off-handed dismissal of his call for parts kits which led into outright ignoring him.
This is after he hyped up 3D printed Hi-Point frames which resulted in existing parts kits going for up to and more than actual Hi-Points.
Click to expand...
And Hi-Point's reasoning for no parts kits is solid:
Untitled.png

Hi-Point has been one of the very, very few SNS companies to avoid any serious legal drama and they clearly aim to keep it that way. It's like the people disagreeing with them over this don't remember the absolute bloodbath that was the mid 90s-early 2000s for these types of gun companies. Saturday night specials were THE thing the anti-gunners went after in the 90s after the AWB was passed, cheap handguns being seen as an easy gateway to ban all handguns. Hi-Point was able to evade it all back then, why would they want to risk a round 2? Of all the SNS manufactures that were around 25 years ago, only Hi-Point and Phoenix Arms are alive today, and they did it by avoiding obvious traps like that.
 
S.C.U.D. said:
And Hi-Point's reasoning for no parts kits is solid:
View attachment 5882672
Hi-Point has been one of the very, very few SNS companies to avoid any serious legal drama and they clearly aim to keep it that way. It's like the people disagreeing with them over this don't remember the absolute bloodbath that was the mid 90s-early 2000s for these types of gun companies. Saturday night specials were THE thing the anti-gunners went after in the 90s after the AWB was passed, cheap handguns being seen as an easy gateway to ban all handguns. Hi-Point was able to evade it all back then, why would they want to risk a round 2? Of all the SNS manufactures that were around 25 years ago, only Hi-Point and Phoenix Arms are alive today, and they did it by avoiding obvious traps like that.
Click to expand...
"We won't do X because the anti-gun people will get mad," said the gun manufacturer.

Sounds like the anti-gun people already won. Why legislate parts kits when you can get the manufacturer to stop providing them for sale? Maybe anti-gunners have figured out the Liz Fong Jones method.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom