Disaster Google will soon default to blurring explicit image search results - To "protect democracy", you must be logged in to see unblurred breasts or dead Russians

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/202...lt-to-blurring-explicit-image-search-results/ [A]

Google will soon default to blurring explicit image search results​

Unless you're logged in and over 18, don't expect to find violent or racy stuff.​

KEVIN PURDY - 2/7/2023, 3:25 PM

Google's new Blur setting for SafeSearch will soon be the default, blurring explicit images unless you're logged in and over 18.


Google's new "Blur" setting for SafeSearch will soon be the default, blurring explicit images unless you're logged in and over 18.

Google has debuted a new default SafeSearch setting, somewhere between "on" and "off," that automatically blurs explicit images in search results for most people.

In a blog post timed to Safer Internet Day, Google outlined a number of measures it plans to implement to "protect democracies worldwide," secure high-risk individuals, improve password management, and protect credit card numbers. Tucked into a series of small-to-medium announcements is a notable change to search results, Google's second core product after advertising.

A new setting, rolling out "in the coming months," "will blur explicit imagery if it appears in Search results when SafeSearch filtering isn't turned on," writes Google's Jen Fitzpatrick, senior vice president of Core Systems & Experiences. "This setting will be the new default for people who don't already have the SafeSearch filter turned on, with the option to adjust settings at any time."

Google's explanatory image (seen above) shows someone logged in and searching for images of "Injury." A notice shows that "Google turned on SafeSearch blurring," which "blurs explicit images in your search results." One of the example image results—"Dismounted Complex Blast Injury (DCBI)" from ResearchGate—is indeed quite explicit, as far as human viscera and musculature goes. Google provides one last check if you click on that blurred image: "This image may contain explicit content. SafeSearch blurring is on."

Explicit images, such as the blast injury shown in Google's example, will be blurred by default in Google search images, unless a user is over 18, signs in, and turns it off.

Explicit images, such as the "blast injury" shown in Google's example, will be blurred by default in Google search images, unless a user is over 18, signs in, and turns it off.

If you click "View image," you see life's frail nature. If you click "Manage setting," you can choose between three settings: Filter (where explicit results don't show up at all), Blur (where both blurring and are-you-sure clicks occur), and Off (where you see "all relevant results, even if they're explicit").

Signed-in users under the age of 18 automatically have SafeSearch enabled, blocking content including "pornography, violence, and gore." With this change, Google will automatically be blurring explicit content for everybody using Google who doesn't log in, stay logged in, and specifically ask to show it instead. It's a way to prevent children from getting access to explicit images, but also, notably, a means of ensuring people are logged in to Google if they're looking for something… very specific. An incognito window, it seems, just won't do.

Google turned on SafeSearch as its default for under-18 users in August 2021, having been pressured by Congress to better protect children across its services, including search and YouTube.
 
I’ve used google less and less recently. Just going on to any other search engine lets you realize just how fucking neutered Google’s search results are. Let them blur it. I won’t be using the engine to see it happen.

Nobody should be using modern google. It fails miserably as a search engine if you’re looking for anything even slightly uncommon or vague.
 
My take: nothing Google does is for any reason other than to acquire more data, and this is just to push more people into logging in for that purpose. The "protect democracies" excuse is comical. This will affect you using a VPN. Even Bing isn't this pozzed yet. Also expect all sorts of random or not-so-random images to be blurred as "explicit content" depending on who's defining that.
 
I’ve used google less and less recently. Just going on to any other search engine lets you realize just how fucking neutered Google’s search results are. Let them blur it. I won’t be using the engine to see it happen.

Nobody should be using modern google. It fails miserably as a search engine if you’re looking for anything even slightly uncommon or vague.
Everybody does to some extent though.

Most alternative SEs do not have their own engine, but rely on Google or Bing to do it for them. If they don't, they are not really better tbh.

Honestly, this changes nothing. If you have safe search enabled, you don't even see explicit images for the most part.

As long as they don't force accounts/account verification, this does nothing. It's PR. I am fine with it.

ETA : my bad I missed this

Google will automatically be blurring explicit content for everybody using Google who doesn't log in
Search engines relying on their search results will hopefully be able to get around this.
 
Last edited:
A while ago google censored Nazi flags if you looked up WW2 operations on the info box. You could look up Operation Barbossa or the Battle of the Bulge and see the flags for every nation except Nazi Germany.

One less reason to use google now since even that chad Indian can't google big boob and get 12 million results.
 
I’ve used google less and less recently. Just going on to any other search engine lets you realize just how fucking neutered Google’s search results are. Let them blur it. I won’t be using the engine to see it happen.

Nobody should be using modern google. It fails miserably as a search engine if you’re looking for anything even slightly uncommon or vague.
Reminder about their image search:

15613171-33A0-486E-985A-E66629B791EC.jpeg

It was always inaccurate.
 
I’ve used google less and less recently. Just going on to any other search engine lets you realize just how fucking neutered Google’s search results are. Let them blur it. I won’t be using the engine to see it happen.

Nobody should be using modern google. It fails miserably as a search engine if you’re looking for anything even slightly uncommon or vague.
What do y’all use as replacements? I’ve been using for Google since I was a wee lass so I guess I’ve adapted to its crap factor, but I would like recs for something better.
 
Google is a dying company, all of their decisions have made their products worse. In fact they are so stupid that their pajeet "programmers" fucked up youtube's "search by oldest first" and don't know how to fix it.


What a bunch of idiots, this is what happens when you hire in-house trannies and outsource to 3rd world countries. Keep clinging to life Google, you won't be clinging for much longer.
 
Yandex is better for jacking off
Just barely. They both have a rather strange habit of giving you results 1:1 reversed with your requests. For example, just trying to see some quaint nordic titties in a wheat field can sometimes net you outright >White extinction propaganda< linked from the same two transvestite-cuckold twitter pages. Really thunk provoking.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Elim Garak
Back