US Government secretly orders Google to track anyone searching certain names, addresses, and phone numbers

(source) (archive)
https://sneed.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/aRdghiwwHe7P8y6Lz5wTiA--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTQzMDtjZj13ZWJw/https://sneed.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/gUOdX9uoiDYoMguAAQe5fg--~B/aD05NDA7dz0xNTQwO2FwcGlkPXl0YWNoeW9u/https://media.zenfs.com/en/washington_examiner_articles_265/60fdb0f99f044ca4af607594d1c2ffed
Government secretly orders Google to track anyone searching certain names, addresses, and phone numbers

The U.S. government is reportedly secretly issuing warrants for Google to provide user data on anyone typing in certain search terms, raising fears that innocent online users could get caught up in serious crime investigations at a greater frequency than previously thought.

In an attempt to track down criminals, federal investigators have started using new "keyword warrants" and used them to ask Google to provide them information on anyone who searched a victim's name or their address during a particular year, an accidentally unsealed court document that Forbes found shows.

GOOGLE'S METHODS FOR SPYING ON EMPLOYEES REVEALED IN REPORT

Google has to respond to thousands of warrant orders each year, but the keyword warrants are a relatively new strategy used by the government and are controversial.

“Trawling through Google’s search history database enables police to identify people merely based on what they might have been thinking about, for whatever reason, at some point in the past,” Jennifer Granick, surveillance and cybersecurity counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, told Forbes.

“This never-before-possible technique threatens First Amendment interests and will inevitably sweep up innocent people, especially if the keyword terms are not unique and the time frame not precise. To make matters worse, police are currently doing this in secret, which insulates the practice from public debate and regulation,” she added.

The government said that the scope of the warrants is limited to avoid implicating innocent people who happen to search for certain terms, but it's not publicly disclosed how many users' data are sent to the government and what the extent of the warrant requests are.

Google has defended its decision to respond to the warrants and said it protects users when doing so.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“As with all law enforcement requests, we have a rigorous process that is designed to protect the privacy of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” a Google spokesperson said.
 
What is the PATRIOT Act?
It's only tangentially related to the PATRIOT Act and in most cases, not at all. Time to ditch Google and start using Yandex.

Edit; Here's a pdf of one order related to bombings in Austin TX, which are detailed in the original Forbes article. As you can see you may have had your shit turned over to the feds if you were looking for an address in Austin and imputed the search terms they were after.

I am always hopelessly lost so I look up addresses all the time. Going back to fucking maps, jfc.
 
Last edited:
Time to ditch Google and start using Yandex.
Mojeek and Wibly are other alternatives.

Problem is the former has weak search results, while the latter is fairly new. Either way, both use their own instances and don't require javascript to load

Every other search engine out there is fucked by using Google's shit including SearX. It's explained better here
 
I have nothing to hide, FBI.
FBI.jpg
 
"How many tarantulas can fit in a dead hooker's asshole."
"How long does the brain survive after the head is cut off?"
"Maximum range of a M82A2?"
"Primary ingredients of Semtex?"
"Top speed of a police car?"
"Top speed of a helicopter?"
"Top speed of an electric motor cycle?"
"How much money does a bank have in its vault?"
"Is throwing a tarantula on a bank teller considered assault?"
"Can communists fly if they are thrown out of a helicopter?"
 
Back