He was wrongly put in prison for 11 years, then was handed a bill of £37,000 for the inconvenience - 'This is not just about us. It’s about every individual who has been wrongfully convicted and then charged for their stay in prison — a place they should never have been in the first place'

Link: https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/wrongly-put-prison-11-years-32028530
Credit: Conor Gogarty, Investigations editor for Wales Online, 06:37, 10 Jul 2025
Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/4aT4f

998.webp

Michael O’Brien stages protest outside the Welsh Secretary's office in Cardiff (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne)

A Welshman who was wrongly imprisoned for 11 years is taking the UK Government to court over its decision to charge him "bed and board" for his time in jail. Michael O’Brien and two other men — known as the Cardiff Newsagent Three — were convicted of the 1987 killing of Cardiff newsagent Phillip Saunders but later had their convictions quashed after police misconduct in the case emerged.

After his release Mr O’Brien, of Aberdare, was awarded £650,000 in compensation for the time he spent in prison. But an independent assessor, Lord Brennan KC, decided £37,000 should be deducted from the payout to account for living costs like rent and food that he would have had to pay for if he hadn’t been jailed.

The case took another twist in 2023 when the Tories' then-justice secretary Alex Chalk KC scrapped the policy of bed and board costs being deducted from payouts. But after coming into power last year the Labour government decided the change would not be applied retrospectively — meaning no refunds for people like Mr O’Brien whose compensation was paid before the new policy.

Some 58,000 people have signed a petition backing Mr O'Brien's campaign to be reimbursed and his legal team is awaiting a court date having filed an application for a judicial review of the Government’s decision.

Mr O'Brien, 55, and a group of supporters held a protest on June 27 outside the office of the Secretary of State for Wales, Jo Stevens, in Cardiff's Central Square. "No one came out even though we gave them the opportunity," said Mr O'Brien. "They knew we'd be there because I told them we would be.

"It just goes to show the contempt they've got for us. She [Ms Stevens] should be looking after the Welsh people and raising our concerns. I wrote to her weeks ago and haven't heard back. We've got the backing of 22 members of the Senedd but we have not heard from her at all."

Last year a Senedd motion backed by 22 members called for retrospective repayment of bed and board deductions in cases like Mr O'Brien's.

0_rbp_mai270625michael39959JPG.webp

Michael O’Brien and supporters protest outside the Welsh Secretary's office in Cardiff (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne)

During the recent protest Mr O'Brien spoke to passers-by about his case. "The public were shocked we were treated so badly," he said.

After his conviction was overturned in 1999, Mr O'Brien successfully challenged the bed and board deduction in the High Court, but the UK Government then won in the Court of Appeal.

Mr O’Brien decided not to appeal that ruling because of legal advice that he could face costs of around £140,000 if he lost again.

At the time he resigned himself to never getting the deduction back. But the debate returned to the headlines in 2023 when the rape conviction of Andrew Malkinson — who had spent 17 years in jail — was quashed and the then-Tory Government decided Mr Malkinson should not be charged for bed and board.

A review was launched into whether other wrongly convicted ex-prisoners should have their deductions revoked. But the Labour Government opted against this as the Ministry of Justice warned it would mean "significant" costs.

Now Mr O’Brien has partnered with Paul Blackburn, who spent 25 years in jail for an attempted murder he did not commit and then had £100,000 bed and board cut from his compensation.

Hickman and Rose solicitors are representing Mr O’Brien and Mr Blackburn on a “no win, no fee” basis but they could face heavy costs if the judicial review does not go their way, so they have launched a crowdfunding page.

Mr O’Brien said: “This is not just about us. It’s about every individual who has been wrongfully convicted and then charged for their stay in prison — a place they should never have been in the first place.

"It is estimated by the Innocence Project that hundreds could be affected by this policy. This practice adds insult to injury for victims of wrongful convictions and must be addressed immediately. We have now been refused legal aid to challenge this unjust decision and aim to raise the funds to cover our legal costs.

"They did not charge guilty people for being rightly imprisoned — only innocent miscarriages of justice victims.”

The UK Government told us that since August 2023 living expenses have not been deducted from compensation but that it is "standard government protocol that policy changes are not applied retrospectively".

(For more information about this case, please visit: https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/innocent-man-jailed-11-years-29816928)
 
Reminder that "wrongly imprisoned" doesn't meant innocent. It's very hard to find anything of substance regarding the decision to release these men, but I've seen enough cases where obviously guilty murderers go free because one of the cops who arrested him missed some bullshit formality during the process.

Regardless, as a citizen of Wales, he should be thrilled that they're only charging him 37k in back taxes. Had he spent those 11 years working they'd have taken ten times as much.
 
I'm not really familiar with the case. Is this a procedural issue that led to him being wrongfully imprisoned and he's "innocent"? Or is he provably innocent, exonerated, and had nothing to do with it?

Was the actual murderer identified?

I'm always skeptical of this kind of thing. There are always a lot of word games and technicalities going on. The media treats and conflates wrongful imprisonment as exoneration or framing frequently.

They are both massive issues and the legal process exists for a reason, but they're really quite separate matters.
 
I'm not really familiar with the case. Is this a procedural issue that led to him being wrongfully imprisoned and he's "innocent"? Or is he provably innocent, exonerated, and had nothing to do with it?

Was the actual murderer identified?

I'm always skeptical of this kind of thing. There are always a lot of word games and technicalities going on. The media treats and conflates wrongful imprisonment as exoneration or framing frequently.
Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/0dk8G

This is the full story of what happened to Philip Saunders on that fateful day of October 12 1987.

Though DNA testing for crimes began in that same year, following the Dawn Ashworth murder in Enderby, Leciester, it's sadly not resulted in the person/s responsible being arrested.

The real murderer/s have never been found, and are unlikely to ever be found.
 
I'm not really familiar with the case. Is this a procedural issue that led to him being wrongfully imprisoned and he's "innocent"? Or is he provably innocent, exonerated, and had nothing to do with it?

Was the actual murderer identified?

I'm always skeptical of this kind of thing. There are always a lot of word games and technicalities going on. The media treats and conflates wrongful imprisonment as exoneration or framing frequently.

They are both massive issues and the legal process exists for a reason, but they're really quite separate matters.
Does it really matter though? If you are wrongfully convicted, be it due to corruption or technical fuckups, the country HAS to pay you a massive sum so that the chances for it repeating will decrease. Otherwise you just gave the government an easy way to deal with problematic people.
 
Does it really matter though?
Depending on the context it absolutely matters, in my opinion.

Would you want to, with your family, live next to somebody who was convicted of being a kiddy diddler but later discovered to be convicted based on illegally obtained evidence? Even though they were "wrongfully imprisoned" and no longer have a criminal record? I wouldn't, they're still a guilty-as-sin kiddy diddler.

Innocent and wrongfully imprisoned are way too often conflated. As I said, both are massive issues and should be addressed, but staying cognizant of their separate natures is crucial. Otherwise you have scum being held up as virtuous heroic angels with glowing media pieces that play cutesy word games to reinforce their worldview.
 
Depending on the context it absolutely matters, in my opinion.

Would you want to, with your family, live next to somebody who was convicted of being a kiddy diddler but later discovered to be convicted based on illegally obtained evidence? Even though they were "wrongfully imprisoned" and no longer have a criminal record? I wouldn't, they're still a guilty-as-sin kiddy diddler.

Innocent and wrongfully imprisoned are way too often conflated. As I said, both are massive issues and should be addressed, but staying cognizant of their separate natures is crucial. Otherwise you have scum being held up as virtuous heroic angels with glowing media pieces that play cutesy word games to reinforce their worldview.
Obviously I wouldn't, but it can just as easily be forged evidence/false testimony and it's one if us that needs to deal with a decade in jail and being put on a registry, which essentially ends your life.
 
Depending on the context it absolutely matters, in my opinion.

Would you want to, with your family, live next to somebody who was convicted of being a kiddy diddler but later discovered to be convicted based on illegally obtained evidence? Even though they were "wrongfully imprisoned" and no longer have a criminal record? I wouldn't, they're still a guilty-as-sin kiddy diddler.

Innocent and wrongfully imprisoned are way too often conflated. As I said, both are massive issues and should be addressed, but staying cognizant of their separate natures is crucial. Otherwise you have scum being held up as virtuous heroic angels with glowing media pieces that play cutesy word games to reinforce their worldview.
Typical words from a kiddy diddler and serial killer that has never been charged.
 
Booking and housing fees are in all US jails. If you owe, you have a debt, they cant force taking it unless you have cash in your pocket during booking. They cant take it out of your bank account directly, but they'll intercept it if it goes as part of their system.

Not surprised Ireland is similar in a way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Made In Wales
Would you want to, with your family, live next to somebody who was convicted of being a kiddy diddler but later discovered to be convicted based on illegally obtained evidence?
Nope but I consider police/government misconduct a potentially bigger issue than the occasional nonce.

Pedos gonna pedo. Cops getting away with shit can (and historically, has) make things go very bad very quickly.
 
Back