Bespoke translation by yours truly. Original source [A]
I often say that the SPD is the most unconstitutional [political] party [in Germany] judged by its prior actions.
WELT reports: Now comes the initiative to prosecute "insults against politicians" even more comprehensively
Even more comprehensively?
The phrasing is awesome: They criminalize something to make prosecuting it easier.
"adjusting"....
Which hints at massive deficiencies in law studies and legal history, even if she has been a judge at three courts, this is not a contradiction nowadays. Apparently she doesn't know where this law even comes from.
Instead, they're setting up a general majesty offense paragraph.
This is particularly bad because it's based on insult and hate - but both of these are totally arbitrary legal terms, and this is no longer dependent on a demand for prosecution by the "aggrieved" party. So there is no longer a requirement that the politician feels offended in the first place. And there is no objective crime, because "hate" and "insult" are arbitrarily determined by every prosecutor and judge the way they feel like doing it. And I have already described how the official judgment of "hate" is that it's not defined at all, but the daily current discourse decides what hate currently means. See the NDR.
I see.
There still exists criticism of the SPD, so they need to go tougher until it's quiet.
And then they always tell us that they're the defenders of the constitution, which they are to protect against the evil AfD.
Head-on attack against freedom of speech
I often say that the SPD is the most unconstitutional [political] party [in Germany] judged by its prior actions.
WELT reports: Now comes the initiative to prosecute "insults against politicians" even more comprehensively
Even more comprehensively?
From the SPD comes an initiative to reduce the requirements of "insults against politicians" to make criminal prosecution easier. Lower Saxony wants to submit a corresponding proposition in the upcoming justice minister summit. A constitutional lawyer warns about violating the constitution.
The phrasing is awesome: They criminalize something to make prosecuting it easier.
The Minister of Justice of Lower Saxony, Kathrin Wahlmann (SPD), calls for adjusting the criminal code to more comprehensively prosecute the insulting of politicians. A corresponding proposition is to be made at the state-level minister of justice summit which starts on Thursday. The original draft is available to WELT, first the "Legal Tribune Online" reported on this.
"adjusting"....
The core of the proposition is to reduce the requirements of "insults against politicians". There is a criterion according to which an insult can only be prosecuted as "insult against politicians" if the act is suitable for "significantly hindering" the "public work" of the politicians - this criterion is to be dropped.
Which hints at massive deficiencies in law studies and legal history, even if she has been a judge at three courts, this is not a contradiction nowadays. Apparently she doesn't know where this law even comes from.
Instead, they're setting up a general majesty offense paragraph.
This is particularly bad because it's based on insult and hate - but both of these are totally arbitrary legal terms, and this is no longer dependent on a demand for prosecution by the "aggrieved" party. So there is no longer a requirement that the politician feels offended in the first place. And there is no objective crime, because "hate" and "insult" are arbitrarily determined by every prosecutor and judge the way they feel like doing it. And I have already described how the official judgment of "hate" is that it's not defined at all, but the daily current discourse decides what hate currently means. See the NDR.
"Because the regulations that were made for this in the past have proven to be insufficiently effective, I plead at this year's justice minister summit to reinforce them."
I see.
There still exists criticism of the SPD, so they need to go tougher until it's quiet.
And then they always tell us that they're the defenders of the constitution, which they are to protect against the evil AfD.