Culture How the woke left abandoned feminism, labor, and the planet to globalism - Activists have been gaslit into believing that protecting labor rights is racist and defending women’s spaces is bigotry

Article (Archive)

What do Greta Thunberg, Simone Biles, and the American anti-ICE protesters have in common, besides a flair for theatrics and a knack for setting fire (sometimes literally) to the causes they claim to champion?

The latest chaos gripping California like a leftist would a reusable tote bag containing oat milk and guilt, started at Home Depot in California. Immigration authorities raided one of the chain’s parking lots in Los Angeles, which quickly escalated from “can I help you find a hammer?” to full-blown urban dystopia. The next thing you know, someone’s standing on a flaming car waving a Mexican flag like they just unlocked a Grand Theft Auto achievement. But let’s rewind.

Why Home Depot? Because, according to the Wall Street Journal, the White House instructed Immigration and Customs Enforcement to target undocumented workers hanging out in those parking lots. Think of them as the gig economy’s open-air waiting room, just like the food delivery platform guys perched outside McDonald’s, only with more drywall experience. They’re trying to land quick jobs from people who’d rather pay under the table than decode a Swedish or Chinese manual to assemble one.

And just like that, the entire progressive apparatus decided this was the next hill to die on. “These are hardworking members of our community!” they cried. “They do the jobs Americans won’t do!”

Hold up. When did defending a labor underclass become progressive chic? Didn’t the left used to rage against this kind of exploitation? Corporate America must be thrilled that the revolution now comes with a free supply of cheap, compliant labor and a hashtag campaign to promote the idea that if you’re against it, then you’re a fascist.

So congrats, leftists. You’ve handed the working class over to the pro-Trump populists like a party favor.

Want to actually help undocumented foreigners in America? Try opposing the foreign policy dumpster fire that helped displace them: sanctions, economic sabotage, CIA meddling, and those “extraterritorial legal tools” that make doing any business with them back home feel like pulling the arm on a Vegas slot machine.

Your activist forebears knew this. Cesar Chavez didn’t just fast for farmworkers; he opposed the Vietnam War, because he understood exploitation doesn’t stop at the border. Tom Hayden fought for unions and against war. Dorothy Day started the Catholic Worker Movement and still managed to call out empire.

Today’s left, meanwhile, is acting like unpaid NATO interns on social media, slapping flags on their bios and cheering military adventures in the name of “human rights.” In 1999, if you protested globalism, you were a leftist. Today, you’re more likely to get tackled by Antifa.

Nowhere is this ideological faceplant more obvious than in modern feminism. Take the recent online cage match between Olympic legend Simone Biles and former swimmer turned women’s sports defender Riley Gaines.

It kicked off when a Minnesota girls’ softball team won a championship with a male pitcher. Gaines tweeted, “To be expected when your star player is a boy.”

Biles vaulted into the culture war and landed face first: “You’re truly sick, all of this campaigning because you lost a race. Straight up sore loser. You should be uplifting the trans community and perhaps finding a way to make sports inclusive OR creating a new avenue where trans feel safe in sports. Maybe a transgender category IN ALL sports!!” Then she added, “Bully someone your own size, which would ironically be a male.”

And just like that, one of the most decorated female athletes on Earth decided that women’s sports are too exclusionary. Simone Biles, icon of women’s physicality, now dunking on other women to make room for men in their lanes. How very empowering. Simone Biles somersaulted right over feminism and landed in patriarchy’s lap.

Second-wave feminist icon, Gloria Steinem, who once dedicated a chapter to female physical strength in Moving Beyond Words, lamented how she “spurned sports” and felt “angry for and at myself” for denying her own physical potential.

Now imagine what Steinem might have said if her shot at athletic expression had been stomped out by a guy in a ponytail and jock strap lapping her on the track.

No one’s saying trans-identified males can’t enjoy sports. But sacrificing women’s opportunities so Chad can pitch for the varsity women’s team on a full scholarship isn’t exactly progress. Even Biles once joked, back in 2017, “ahhhh good thing guys don’t compete against girls or he’d take all the gold medals !!”

Well, now they do. And Biles is cheering them on. What a win for feminism. Look, this isn’t complicated. It’s not feminism if you need a prostate to qualify. Seems that the most fragile thing about a women’s sports record these days is the ego of a man in a wig trying to beat it.

How long before uterus-free “women” decide abortion’s not a women’s issue? Or take women’s seats in government or society? Or tell insurance companies to deny coverage for ovarian cysts because they don’t personally have them? The slippery slope here is basically a gender neutral waterslide.

Meanwhile, guess who just got deported from Israel? Greta Thunberg, the climate’s poster child. “We were 12 peaceful volunteers sailing on a civilian ship carrying humanitarian aid on international waters. We did not break laws. We did nothing wrong,” she said after landing in Paris.

Turns out climate change, which tragically supplanted tangible environmental problems like water and air quality, isn’t the media darling that it once was. Maybe because people are too busy surviving economic policies crafted by the same technocrats Greta once marched beside. Maybe she’s realized that saving the planet from carbon means even less when the people on it are starving and getting bombed.

So now Greta’s gone from scolding world leaders at Davos to helping to ferry aid under siege. You know things are off the rails when she’s one of the only ones on the left with the logical sense to ditch a nonsense globalist cause for a real one. Too bad she couldn’t just ride around on Greenpeace ships and actually do useful things for the environment like document actual environmental crimes. Those causes have now been upstaged by hot air.

Which brings us to the bigger picture of those real causes. Labor, feminism, and the environment have been hijacked, gutted, and replaced with mindless vibes, slogans, and slacktivist online moralizing. No wonder so many average voters with these leftist sensibilities feel politically orphaned, or have gravitated to the anti-establishment and anti-globalist Trump camp.

Ask yourself how we got here. It didn’t happen overnight. It was a slow, steady march, backed by the very establishment that now pretends to loathe itself. That is, until Trump wandered in and tipped over the whole display.

Instead of fighting for their own interests, people are applauding their own decline, gaslit into believing that protecting labor rights is racist, defending women’s spaces is bigotry, and questioning foreign military interventions makes you a fascist.

The activism that used to scare the establishment has long since become it. The real revolution won’t be televised — it will probably just be shadowbanned.
 
The left thinks corporations are evil, but only until they declare a pride day.

Do they have to change anything else? Better hours? Better wages? Better benefits? Better quality goods?

Nope, just put up a rainbow flag and we don't care if you hire illegals or build cruise missiles any longer.......
 

the woke left abandoned feminism, labor, and the planet to globalism​

lol no. Hyper-progressive politics were always the implements of globalists.

They want a world where capital is freely liquid across the planet so they can headquarter where taxes are lowest while employing where labor is cheapest. And in countries where the labor isn’t cheap and production/services can’t be moved, globalism supports open borders and illegal immigration.

Leftist globalism opens your borders, raises your taxes, crushes your wages, lowers your living standards, raises the costs of essential needs, and uses the ‘oppression stack’ to sow discord and prevent class war against the elites.
 
The way movements get coopted and destroyed is fascinating. If workers truly organised or if men and women worked together then we’d all be in a much stronger position. So those movements must be subverted. You have to agree that the power structure has been astonishingly successful in doing this
 

the woke left abandoned feminism, labor, and the planet to globalism​

lol no. Hyper-progressive politics were always the implements of globalists.

They want a world where capital is freely liquid across the planet so they can headquarter where taxes are lowest while employing where labor is cheapest. And in countries where the labor isn’t cheap and production/services can’t be moved, globalism supports open borders and illegal immigration.

Leftist globalism opens your borders, raises your taxes, crushes your wages, lowers your living standards, raises the costs of essential needs, and uses the ‘oppression stack’ to sow discord and prevent class war against the elites.
Worth pointing out that free trade (go look up who came up with the economics behind that) policies and the like are globalist by nature as well. It's not just a leftist concept, it's a nationalist vs globalist problem. Hence a lot of 'totally based' Republicans (politicians not voters) being all-in on legal immigration.

The globalist doesn't give a shit about trannies. Which is why you saw a very brief but real attempt by the fucking American right's political class members trying to appeal to trannies with Bruce Jenner as a speaker, including Charlie Kirk having one as a keynote speaker at some event years ago forget exactly when, only to turn around and throw them to the wolves when they're politically inconvenient.

Left or right the people at the top want the benefits of living in a nation without the accompanying responsibilities. The west's current state of affairs can be summed up as too many people wanting to have their cake and eat it too en masse.
 
Wow, thank you RT for telling me how much my country sucks. I guess I'll forget your high rate of AIDS and inability to defeat a country one-millionth of your size.

Also, Gloria Steinem was a self admitted CIA asset.
Putin has no problem working with the globalists and importing browns - as long as they nurse a resentment towards the West. George Galloway who used to have a show on RT led the muslim rights party "RESPECT" in UK. I think he still leads some form of communist outfit.
 
Worth pointing out that free trade (go look up who came up with the economics behind that) policies and the like are globalist by nature as well. It's not just a leftist concept, it's a nationalist vs globalist problem. Hence a lot of 'totally based' Republicans (politicians not voters) being all-in on legal immigration.
The 70’s and 80’s saw the destruction of secondary industry (a labor and capital intensive excercise) in most of the west and its outsourcing to China and south-east Asia where labor is cheap and worker protections few. This was done partially to save money and partially to break the back of the labor union movement who were inherently nationalist and protectionist.

Along with this came ‘privatization’ in countries like the UK and Australia, where industries like telecommunications and banking that had government offerings in the marketplace were declared to be ‘inefficient’ and sold off. Socialize losses, privatize profit. The governments that did this were primarily right-wing (see: Thatcher) or economically-right, socially left (the unironic opposite of Nazis who were economically left and socially right).

The primary difference between right-wing globalism and left-wing globalism is its presentation. Right-wing globalism of the 70’s-90’s was presented as an economic argument, while contemporary left-wing globalism is presented as moral or humanitarian.

The elites, who don’t give a flying fuck about right versus left as long as they can save eight cents on labor manufacturing a $300 pair of sneakers in Vietnam instead of Laos, learned that asking people to like globalism as an economic concept was pointless.

Nobody in the middle and lower classes supported globalism in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s when it returned no economic benefit to the common man and woman. They saw jobs decreasing, prices going up, more and more people on social security, housing getting more expensive. And they said “fuck this, these right wingers are retarded”, an attitude that persists even today. Just mention ‘trickle-down economics’ to anyone over fifty and see how they react.

In the new millennium, the elites sought a more palatable presentation and rebranded globalism as a moral proposition rather than an economic one. Countries like Mexico, India and Zaire were poor because of racism and colonialism, not because they’re populated with idiots. So those low-IQ workers need to be let into Western nations to improve them, even though those same workers don’t do shit to improve their home nations. And if you oppose this you must be a racist.
IMG_4581.webp

Moving manufacturing to the third world and putting women into indentured servitude at $1 a hour making disposable fashion for the West was branded as ‘economic development’.
IMG_8260.webp

The best part, of course, is that ‘economic rationalism’, the right-wing presentation of globalism, fails because it delivers no benefits to the average person. In fact, in the west, it degrades their lives considerably.
But ‘progressivism’, the left-wing presentation of globalism, delivers benefits in the form of moral superiority. You’re not a traitor selling out your children’s future by importing the third world; you are an anti-racist hero! You’re not a money sponge getting squeezed for tax dollars to pay social security for immigrants, you’re supporting economic growth! You’re not evil for supporting the expensive, unreliable and misdiagnosed medical transition of kids, you’re a hero to the LGBTQ+ community! Buy clothes made by near slave labor, it’s good for the third world!

And the best part? The part that has the globalist elites laughing until they piss their pants?
Progressivism. Costs. Them. Nothing.

They found a way to make people in the West work against their own best interests in return for warm fuzzies, nothing more. Where right-wing globalism was rightly opposed because it delivered no return to the average person, left wing globalism gets a pass by skinsuiting as the choice of polity for the enlightened humanist. Even though it still delivers negative social and economic benefits to them, the truly stupid will offer their wrists to the slaver’s manacle as long as they get to sneer about their moral superiority over those horrible nationalists.

Trump vs. Kamala was lukewarm milquetoast nationalism versus full-blown retard globalism, and I will NEVER understand how fucking retarded at least 48% of the voting public needed to be to not deliver a twenty-point landslide to Trump across the board.

Thanks for reading my blogpost.
I’m tired, boss.
 
Not completely related to this thread but the guy of American Thinker posted this article about the left.

June 27, 2025

Why the American Left Is in Big Trouble​

By John Horvat II

The Left always likes to portray itself as the angry party. It defines itself by its ability to champion causes that recall the French Revolution’s trilogy of liberty, equality, and fraternity and the mob storming the Bastille.

Wherever there are restrictions -- even legitimate ones -- the Left calls for liberation and license. Where differences appear -- even natural ones of talent or effort -- the Left denounces them as injustice and demands absolute equality. The angry party is always looking for a good revolution to incite or a crisis not to waste.

However, this angry party image is now in trouble in America. Since the last election, the Left has been rudderless, disoriented, and uninspired. It has gone from being the party of clamor to that of whining. There is no thunder on the Left, only incoherent rants.

A Global Populist Movement

This lack of direction is a sign that something major has gone awry. It is not a matter of tweaking, framing, or remessaging. Some observers suggest that the world is transitioning from one historical epoch to another. The debate shifted, and the Left was left behind.

The New York Times editorial writer David Brooks, who himself shifts from Left to Right as the mood seizes him, describes the current phenomenon as “a world-shifting political movement” affecting both the Left and the Right. He compares it to the Communist Revolution, the New Deal, the Sixties, feminism, the LGBTQ+ revolution and other key movements that marked modernity.

He calls this massive shift the “global populist movement.” It is characterized by a general distrust of social structures, governmental programs, and institutions. People consider everything to be “rigged, corrupt and malevolent.” They question everything, harbor social resentment and demand signals of trust.
 
gripping California like a leftist would a reusable tote bag containing oat milk and guilt
like they just unlocked a Grand Theft Auto achievement.
the food delivery platform guys perched outside McDonald’s, only with more drywall experience.
at make doing any business with them back home feel like pulling the arm on a Vegas slot machine.
somersaulted right over feminism and landed in patriarchy’s lap.
These mixed metaphors aren't really working for me.
 
Seems that the most fragile thing about a women’s sports record these days is the ego of a man in a wig trying to beat it.
:story:

Holy shit my sides.

My wife was pretty apolitical when I met her. But that all changed when the Tranny scourge attacked. She's a violent TERF now and I love her even more for it. If she had been quoted as saying this, I wouldn't be surprised.
 
These mixed metaphors aren't really working for me.
The left can't help it, it's why they can' meme, it's why they can't write scripts, it's why they start every "14 heartbreaking stories" article with flourishes about how the cup of coffee the illegal is drinking looks on the kitchen table.....

They assume 'smart' people all write this way.
 
Back