Intel's Brian Krzanich is forced out as CEO after 'consensual relationship' with employee

http://archive.fo/zI8dC

Intel's Brian Krzanich was forced out as CEO following an investigation into a "consensual relationship with an Intel employee," the company announced Thursday.

Krzanich has also left the board, it said.

Chief financial officer Robert Swan will step in as interim CEO, effective immediately, and the board has already begun the search for a permanent replacement.

"An ongoing investigation by internal and external counsel has confirmed a violation of Intel's non-fraternization policy, which applies to all managers," the company said in a statement. "Given the expectation that all employees will respect Intel's values and adhere to the company's code of conduct, the Board has accepted Mr. Krzanich's resignation."

Krzanich violated a policy that said managers cannot have relationships with people who report to them either directly or indirectly. The relationship ended and took place "some time back," people familiar with the situation told CNBC. It's unclear with whom Krzanich, 58, had the relationship.

The company was only recently made aware of the relationship, at which point it began probing and Krzanich was asked to resign, the people said.

Krzanich's total compensation topped $21 million last year, and the company paid for his transportation and residential security, according to company filings.

Shares of Intel initially rose 2 percent in premarket trading after the announcement but was down 1.8 percent in morning trading.

Krzanich was named CEO and elected to the board in May 2013, according to a summary of his biography on Intel's website. Before that, he served as executive vice president and chief operating officer. He joined Intel in 1982.

He led Intel's transformation from a PC-centric to a data-focused company, delivering the technology foundations for the new data economy, according to the company's most recent 10K statement.

"The Board believes strongly in Intel's strategy and we are confident in Bob Swan's ability to lead the company as we conduct a robust search for our next CEO," Intel Chairman Andy Bryant said in a statement. "Bob has been instrumental to the development and execution of Intel's strategy, and we know the company will continue to smoothly execute. We appreciate Brian's many contributions to Intel."

Intel's stock has risen about 120 percent during Krzanich's tenure as CEO.

Also Thursday, Intel raised its guidance for the second quarter. The company said it now expects adjusted earnings of 99 cents per share on $16.9 billion in revenue. Intel previously forecast second-quarter earnings of 85 cents a share on $16.3 billion in revenue.
 
Okay, how does having a "consensual relationship" with an employee get someone fired? I'd understand if it was non-consensual (obviously) or if this was between two military personnel, but neither of those are the case. Someone tell me whether this is legitimate grounds for firing someone or if it was just another case of a company succumbing to the social justice craze.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Uncanny Valley
Okay, how does having a "consensual relationship" with an employee get someone fired? I'd understand if it was non-consensual (obviously) or if this was between two military personnel, but neither of those are the case. Someone tell me whether this is legitimate grounds for firing someone or if it was just another case of a company succumbing to the social justice craze.
It's almost always improper for the CEO to fuck an employee since by definition the CEO is the employee's superior on the org chart. Most companies don't want employees fucking if one has supervisory power over the other.

Hence not shitting where you eat always being the best policy to take.
 
If he violated written company policy, that’s pretty much it. I’m sure he’ll be making millions somewhere else within a month.

This is the exact same thing perennial favorite cow Alison Rapp did. Flouted company policy like an idiot, and got thrown out on her ass when it was found out.
 
If he violated written company policy, that’s pretty much it. I’m sure he’ll be making millions somewhere else within a month.

This is the exact same thing perennial favorite cow Alison Rapp did. Flouted company policy like an idiot, and got thrown out on her ass when it was found out.
CEOs tend to take longer to land a new role elsewhere, because it's rare to see these jobs open-up, the big compensations do make up for it though.
 
I mean... for all the talk of power imbalances this is a pretty legit one. Not that there was necessarily anything wrong with this particular relationship, but it's easy to see how it becomes a problem and suddenly you're getting sued because Sally felt she would be fired if she broke it off with the CEO.
 
Okay, how does having a "consensual relationship" with an employee get someone fired? I'd understand if it was non-consensual (obviously) or if this was between two military personnel, but neither of those are the case. Someone tell me whether this is legitimate grounds for firing someone or if it was just another case of a company succumbing to the social justice craze.

One, it's highly improper for a boss to have a relationship with a subordinate.
Two, it probably looks bad considering he's married to someone else.
 
When are people going to learn "Don't shit where you eat." Is more then a somewhat colorful euphemism, and ACTUALLY good advice? Don't date people you work with, or that work FOR you. It's common sense that, sadly, has become increasingly rare these days.
 
I mean... for all the talk of power imbalances this is a pretty legit one. Not that there was necessarily anything wrong with this particular relationship, but it's easy to see how it becomes a problem and suddenly you're getting sued because Sally felt she would be fired if she broke it off with the CEO.
Yeah. There's also the chance of somebody making very poor choices for the whole company just to keep the fuckbuddy happy.
 
Okay, how does having a "consensual relationship" with an employee get someone fired? I'd understand if it was non-consensual (obviously) or if this was between two military personnel, but neither of those are the case. Someone tell me whether this is legitimate grounds for firing someone or if it was just another case of a company succumbing to the social justice craze.

It's a classic conflict of interest scenario. Someone in a position of power can't openly be fooling around with an underling, especially if the possibility exists that the CEO's lover might be getting promotions and bonuses instead of other coworkers who genuinely have earned them.
 
CEO's being in relationships with employees has a ton of potential issues that come with it. What if the CEO decides to show favoritism to the employee and give her jobs that would better be taken by more deserving and qualified workers? What if the employee is legitimately talented and hardworking, and the CEO gets pissy and has her fired for no reason when the relationship starts to fall apart?
Completely forcing the CEO out seems like a bit much imho, but I understand why they did it.
 
Back