Is Asexuality even real?

BipolarPon

ELEMENT OF [Hyperlink Blocked]
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Apr 18, 2018
It's not an uncommon assement on the Farms to think such a sexuality is fake. Are so called Asexauls faking it for clout. Are they really sex repulsed or just virgins who want to feel special?

Or is it a real thing, and there a people who legitimately don't like sex or enjoy it.

I do think it's real but I don't deny there are people making it up to feel special or unique.
 
Virgins who wanna feel special.

Asexuality is basically your entire biological drive, and arguably purpose for life, not working. The only asexuals I met were creepy fucks who couldn't find someone.
 
S'not mutually exclusive. The whole 'Biological Drive' line doesn't really work when you consider that there's always genetic lines and failures. Nature produces Darwin Award Winners constantly, even after millenium of supposed refinement, so clearly reproductive fitness can falter on the individual level. And incels will seeth and claim anything to make them not look like failures.

We're just seeing a spike in this from modern culture. Its both more acceptable to not have a partner, and to not reproduce. Combine that with unprecedented levels of drug use, illegal or otherwise, and chemical contamination of foods, and its really no surprise that there's a lot more people who's biological horny switch doesn't work anymore. And anything that grows big enough as a social and reproductive problem is a goldmine of side-linked Incel seething.
 
It is not real. God gave us sexual urges so that we may be intimate with our wives, husbands and bear children under marriage.
 
Asexual's are not real in the way pop culture has showed them. The only truly asexual humans are those born with genetic condition or contracted ailments (including legitimate mental trauma eg. rape victims) that makes having sex unbearably painful.

This is less "I am not interested in sex" and more "Having sex is so mind numbingly bad I would rather cut off my arm". If this sounds like an extremely tiny minority, that is because it is.

The people going on twitter claiming to be asexual fall largely into 3 categories.

1. anti-social weirdo's looking for an excuse for them not getting any (incels)
2. "gender-special" narcissist's using buzzwords they don't understand to score internet attention
3. Mentally ill/extremely stupid people who have been told they are "asexual" so many times by so many stupid people (mostly groomers) that they genuinely believe it even though its almost certainly not true.

Regardless, actual asexual people are either genetic dead ends or need intense mental help to not become a genetic dead end.
 
Last edited:
A bunch of them are just weird fetishists who can only nut to a very specific type of kink, and can't get off to normal things anymore due to tolerance buildup. If an actual asexual exists IRL, they are likely rare VIA genetic/birth factors.
 
Out of 7 billion, I think statistically, someone has to be. I knew someone who was on medication for a while that basically killed their sex drive until they got the doses fixed.
 
Yes but it's rare. The people on the internet claiming to be asexual rarely are and seem to be awkward or relationship averse.

Truly Asexual people don't develop ''sexual feelings and interests'' in their brains. It goes well beyond their physical appearance or any kind of trauma. For a person to never develop a sex interest or attraction, thoughts feelings is ultra rare. In the cases of Asexual's honestly I don't think we'll ever know what causes that.
 
Asexuals also don't have sex, so any that have had it and not been rape are clearly sexual.
I know of exactly one real asexual person, and it is entirely due to hormonal factors. They WANT to be attracted to
things and be sexual, they just flat out have no sex drive and might as well be a nun. By definition an incel for sure.

The rest I know that call themselves asexuals? Just born losers and suck at life.
 
every asexual I've met had fucked up ideas about sex, love and relationships so no
 
It feels like every year 10 more of these '-sexual' words are being coined and they are getting more and more niche.

I have an aneurysm reading twitter bios, I actually have to consult a dictionary...
 
I've met a few people who identify as asexual, and I think it was different every time.

1. Person who was asexual but still had sex with her boyfriend because he wasn't.
2. Person who lives in a Latin American country and says that she's asexual to reduce the number of horny advances from macho guys.
3. Person who suffered from PCOS and had her ovaries removed.
4. Person who said she had no attraction to her partners and didn't enjoy sex with them, therefore "asexual". Also flirty and identifies as a submissive.

I've never met a guy who openly called themselves asexual.

Like many things in social science, it's a label somebody gives themselves. At worst, easy to lie about. At best, based on introspection, not the most reliable way to measure things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BipolarPon
They say they don't like sex, but will gladly get their rocks off to whatever fetish they like (Feet, gore, floor tiles, etc.)
 
Back