Is it a good idea to register women for the draft, or include them in the military at all? - If so, why?

Gangstalker #32194

Gangstalker #32194

.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 4, 2021

Wicker, the top-ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said he’ll try to strip it out of the bill.
“I’m opposed to that. I don’t think this is the time to get into a debate on the floor of either house about that. We’re not anywhere near implementing a draft, and to me it’s a distraction when we need to be talking about real issues that are immediate,” he said.
“I hope it will fall out, either on the floor or in conference,” he added.
But Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Jack Reed, D-R.I., defended the proposed policy change, arguing that women can hold many warfighting positions without serving as front-line infantry troops.
“Women are doing a remarkable job in our forces today, and if we were in a situation requiring a draft, I think we would need all able-bodied citizens 18 and above,” he said.
“If we go to a draft, that means we’re in a serious, serious situation,” he added.
Click to expand...
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
Read "Employment of Negro Troops" and "The Use of Negro Manpower", internalize the implications of the cultural differences involved, how that affected the troops, and then apply that to what we know of the sexes.
In performance, the all-Negro combat unit of regimental size or larger was less reliable than similar all-white units. The effectiveness of small Negro units varied. Negroes performed better in integrated than in all-Negro combat units, according to the opinions of officers who served with integrated units in Korea. As individuals, Negroes in integrated units performed on a par with white soldiers in the same units. One to three Negroes in a squad did not appear to adversely affect the performance of the squad in combat; the effect of larger numbers was not determined because of insufficient data.
Click to expand...
Despite the stereotypes, women in general are more competitive within the sex than men, but also are generally better at following direct orders, less confrontational, and have higher agreeableness.

I believe women could be successfully integrated in the case of a draft if they are used like the pink and yellow power rangers.
 
  • Informative
  • Autistic
Reactions: Gangstalker #32194, Stan, Aunt Carol and 1 other person
Upvote 0 Downvote
It's absolutely retarded
1) women are not very effective as combat troops, they don't have the physical or mental capabilities to handle war
2) women in the military destroy male cohesion and cooperation
3) you're throwing the wombs of the nation away like cannon fodder

If you see the draft as a method of the state to forcefully enlist it's citizens to ensure the continuation of the state then a better plan would be a "procreation draft": women would be picked and told "you need to have x children".
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Draft but to skillsets. Some women get drafted to stay home make sandwiches , fat lolcows can be canon fodder, farmer women end up in Ro'im Rachok.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
On one hand fuck no this is absolutely retarded.

On the other hand, this is the natural endpoint and result of feminism so I guess people get what they fucking deserve or something.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
They would make for terrible combatants being that men are made for war and hunting and women are made for child rearing and chores. BUT I would hope all white men at this point would rather shoot their own soldiers if a gun was forced into their hands than die fighting a pointless forever war for the noses. Women however would probably happily follow orders and be drafted into the rainbow brigade and salute the twerking black kwang general.

After all of this equality/equity shit it appears women probably won't ever be drafted in the west anyway so our only examples might be the "good guys" of NATO Ukraine that send goyim pregnant women out to fight.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You guys do realize there are about 1000 non direct combat roles in the armed forces, right? We need typists secretaries and clerks as support to the do the things that need to be done to drop ordinance or drill people with 5.56.

We should have a female draft. They demanded voting rights and equal rights everywhere and then 3rd wave feminism demanded equality of outcome at the cost giving women privileges. Fuck them, they want all the benefits and none of the responsibility. They can get draft number like all the rest of us if WW3 pops off with Russia. Women like police officers should be nowhere near combat roles or field duty. They panic, they are generally shit with rifles and heavy equipment like artillery, they have emotional hesitation in killing genuinely bad people and studies have shown men in combat roles make irrational decisions when a female infantrywoman is injured as opposed to a male infantryman. A man sees a woman bleeding from a gunshot wound he responds quickly in a panic, he sees a male infantryman injured he assesses the situation. "where are you injured? can you still return fire?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mesh Gear Fox and Stan
Upvote 0 Downvote
Why not? I know a lot of people sexist men here get hung up on hypothetical scenarios where 110 lb women aren't able to carry wounded 250lb men singlehandedly out of combat and across two states, but those scenarios all seem super unlikely. There's plenty of jobs in the military women can do, and if the nation is so hard up that we need to reimpose a draft, those are probably jobs women ought to be doing so the men can go on giving each other piggyback rides in the desert and peeing in enemy territory.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Gay Baby Jailer
Upvote 0 Downvote
...Just because you're in the military doesn't mean you're in a combat role. I'm sure women could work in mess halls and do quartermaster shit just as well as men.

But also: wimmin dumb :smug: am i right guys, hahaha
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Troon_Patrol said:
Fuck them, they want all the benefits and none of the responsibility.
Click to expand...
I don't really think that is true. A lot of people sexist men seem to think that women are somehow deliberately draft-dodging, but those are also the same men who have 101 reasons why the military cannot tolerate women in it.
Troon_Patrol said:
They panic, they are generally shit with rifles and heavy equipment like artillery, they have emotional hesitation in killing genuinely bad people and studies have shown men in combat roles make irrational decisions when a female infantrywoman is injured as opposed to a male infantryman. A man sees a woman bleeding from a gunshot wound he responds quickly in a panic, he sees a male infantryman injured he assesses the situation. "where are you injured? can you still return fire?"
Click to expand...
Yeah, like this shit exactly. So... which is it? Are women deliberately dodging the draft and "enjoying all the benefits and none of the responsibility", or are they unfit to serve? You guys can't make up your minds on this one.

DJ Grelle said:
If you see the draft as a method of the state to forcefully enlist it's citizens to ensure the continuation of the state then a better plan would be a "procreation draft": women would be picked and told "you need to have x children".
Click to expand...
Which is more onerous: 2 years of civil service draft managing a checkpoint or whatever, or raising some arbitrary number of kids to age 18?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Stan said:
Which is more onerous: 2 years of civil service draft managing a checkpoint or whatever, or raising some arbitrary number of kids to age 18?
Click to expand...
Which is more onerous
a) death or being maimed
b) having kids and raising them

The percentage of women that hate their kids is vastly lower than the casualty rate for modern, peer war.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Stan
Upvote 0 Downvote
DJ Grelle said:
Which is more onerous
a) death or being maimed
b) having kids and raising them
Click to expand...
a) is conditional - not all soldiers are going to be maimed or die in the line of duty.
b) is not - if you have kids, you're on the hook to raise them.
DJ Grelle said:
The percentage of women that hate their kids is vastly lower than the casualty rate for modern, peer war.
Click to expand...
You don't have to hate your kids to acknowledge that raising kids can be exhausting, difficult, and just way more of a commitment allround than a civil service obligation. These things are in no way similar and you deserve the bin of shame
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back