Is this bait? - I feel like a black kid looking at a truck-full of Nike shoes while the police watch me when I see Seth Rogan talking about Satan Inc.

Is this bait?

  • Yes?

  • Yes..

  • YES

  • Yes!

  • Maybe not?

  • It could be sincere.

  • nah..

  • no, it couldn't be bait.

  • OP is a faggot


Results are only viewable after voting.

Haim Arlosoroff

We all failed to secure the existence of Linconia.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
this is bait.jpggun bait.jpg
0f996f135a69a31d644ccd9114a8e31b38d234f6749d85ae70448f9d4f29f119_1.jpgrc2pdL9.jpg
Kiwifam, I've scoured the Capital-I internet. The whole thing. I cannot find the first people who brigaded the Santa Inc Comment Section. I found people who came across it as it was happening. Yet, that is the only thing I saw. I understand eBaum's World sent some of the worst brigading since they ruined a perfectly good YTMND about Lindsay Lohan or Paris Hilton wide amount of facial expressions a decade and a half ago thereabouts. They didn't do this. Seemingly no one did. But maybe Seth Rogan did. Could this be bait in order to advertise Santa Inc? If it is, what should be done about it? Should it be ignored, or can the attention of so many people be used to show Seth Rogan is just another Jew at the center of a #MeToo campaign?

“What I can say is that I despise abuse and harassment and I would never cover or conceal the actions of someone doing it, or knowingly put someone in a situation where they were around someone like that,” Rogen, 39, said in the interview with The Sunday Times. The reporter had asked Rogen if he believed the allegations against Franco, to which Rogen also said he had no plans to work with the Palo Alto native again.

Trying to promote a 122k downvoted Christmas Special about elves trying to overthrow a white patriarch because he is sexist and terrible to women, in order to cover up his friendship with James Franco, with Antisemitism is bizarre but so is the examination of #MeToo era sexism all the while doing whatever the fuck this is:
elf porn.jpg

However it wouldn't be the first of what is known as shock advertising.
slide_17.jpg
Calvin Klein's advertisements used to include children as young as 15 in their sexualized advertising from as far back as the 80's involving Brooke Shields. Advertisers, psychiatrists, and social scientists have long debated the effectiveness of shock advertising. Some scientists argue that shocking ads of course evoke stronger feelings among the consumers. One finding suggests “shocking content in an advertisement significantly increases attention, benefits memory, and positively influences behavior.” The same study also shows that consumers are more likely to remember shocking advertising content over advertising content that is not shocking. Shock advertising could also refer to the usage of emotional appeals such as humor, sex or fear. Humor has for a long time been the most frequently used communication tool within advertising, and according to branch active people it is considered to be the most effective.

The effects of shock advertising could also be explained by the theory of selective perception. Selective perception is the process by which individual selects, organizes and evaluates stimuli from the external environment to provide meaningful experiences for him- or herself. This means that people focus in certain features of their environment to the exclusion of others. The consumer unconsciously chooses which information to notice and this kind of selection is dependent of different perceptual filters which are based on the consumer’s earlier experiences. One example of this kind of filter is perceptual defense. Perceptual defense is the tendency for people to protect themselves against ideas, objects or situations that are threatening. This means that if a consumer finds a certain kind of advertising content threatening or disturbing, this message will be filtered out. An example of this a heavy smoker who could be filtering out a picture of cancer sick lung since the content could be perceived as disturbing and uncomfortable.

TL;DR: Is the Antisemitism, and Seth Rogan's over the top mentioning of Judaism, around Santa Inc. just bait? I mean what the hell is this interview with Sarah?
 
  • Like
Reactions: naaaaiiiiillllll!!!
The responses seem a little too genuinely anti-smallhat. You probably can't find the first mentions because it was likely a pol thread that got auto deleted after 3 days.

Also worth mentioning that chrismas type movies like the one this is "parodying" have never appealed to anybody but white people. So they're making a nostalgia driven product that's shitting on their target audience. Maybe this would have been shocking back in 2016, but this is what every company does now. Even if you support it, it's old.
 
The responses seem a little too genuinely anti-smallhat. You probably can't find the first mentions because it was likely a pol thread that got auto deleted after 3 days.
They were all about the finding of the comment section, and no references to earlier discussions. Its either entirely organic and sprang from nowhere, or it was fake and gay advertising so attention-grabbing that it seemed perfectly 4Chan even though there is no trace thereafter. A day after the comments were locked on youtube /pol/ had specific bait threads with just two Seth images about hiring less whites, and the "That's some Goy" face from the first video for 24 hours and then never again.

Doesn't Sarah just seem too openly praising of Jews? She related everything openly and clearly to Jews, like she's leading people to an obvious joke that isn't made because that's the joke.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lemmingwise
They were all about the finding of the comment section, and no references to earlier discussions. Its either entirely organic and sprang from nowhere, or it was fake and gay advertising so attention-grabbing that it seemed perfectly 4Chan even though there is no trace thereafter. A day after the comments were locked on youtube /pol/ had specific bait threads with just two Seth images about hiring less whites, and the "That's some Goy" face from the first video for 24 hours and then never again.
These jokes are so common that you don't really need an organized op to have everybody instantly jump in and know what to do. I'm not ruling out the possibility that it's a gay op, but I think it's more likely that it's organic.

Also, the crowd that gets all up in arms about antisemetism is more of a right leaning demographic (ironically) who would never support this type of show. If it's an op, it's a poorly planned one. I'd be more inclined to say yes if there were a bunch of black elves and the comments were all about nigger lynching. That would get the left riled up to throw money at HBO.
 
I'd be more inclined to say yes if there were a bunch of black elves and the comments were all about nigger lynching.
Well, that is pretty much what happened? I don't know, I just can't shake that this is too fake and suddenly there one day. Maybe I'm too cynical and people are aware of all the little antisemitic jokes you can make. Toyim was pretty good. Sad that they all got deleted either way.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: talk sh1t
Anything to drive engagement. Controversy and outrage sells, and the market is so saturated with content, drastic measures are necessary.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Haim Arlosoroff
Anything to drive engagement. Controversy and outrage sells, and the market is so saturated with content, drastic measures are necessary.
I just get this "we know you know" feeling and anger from Seth, I don't know. I just hope people aren't baited into giving Hollywood what they want people to give them. It could be a massive eye-opener, Sarah has been saying the quiet parts very very loudly and bluntly.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Johan Hulth
Sarah Silverman is just one of those wookies that's pretty funny (dislike it all you want baby) and is really "in your face" with her Judeo-exceptionalism, but also part of true, oldschool internal Jewish humour is self-deprications.

Its a bit like blacks calling themselves niggers. Yes it would be "anti-Semitism" according to the ADL to say "Jews killed christ" but Jews themselves can do it and be tongue-in-cheek with it.

Like her joke at the start of that video is pretty brilliant. "A lot of us Jews came together to create this.... ... like me and Seth Rogers and bla bla". She literally jokes that "Us Jews killed Christ and created christmas, np!" She even circles back at it lol and says "there's no christmas without Jews" then covers it with " cuz we wrote all the christmas carols" - which is like a double whammy cause "you can't even do your own christmas celebrations without us chipping in".

Its just what it is, Hollywood elite Jews doing their thang, a bit more in your face nowdays since they can.
Its somewhat bait because they want to create a stir, but its more of a troll internally while just being "woke feminist humour" externally.


(Don't get me wrong, as I wrote elsewhere, I'm baffled and saddened by the ostentatious nature of this production.)
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Haim Arlosoroff
A guy walking into your place of worship (internet) and pouring shit over himself is both bait and not bait. As in, of course people are going to react to it and the goal is to get a reaction. There's nothing crafty about that kind of bait and there is a certain level where you're just dumb if you let someone shit all over the place.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Haim Arlosoroff
Back