- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
Kiwifam, I've scoured the Capital-I internet. The whole thing. I cannot find the first people who brigaded the Santa Inc Comment Section. I found people who came across it as it was happening. Yet, that is the only thing I saw. I understand eBaum's World sent some of the worst brigading since they ruined a perfectly good YTMND about Lindsay Lohan or Paris Hilton wide amount of facial expressions a decade and a half ago thereabouts. They didn't do this. Seemingly no one did. But maybe Seth Rogan did. Could this be bait in order to advertise Santa Inc? If it is, what should be done about it? Should it be ignored, or can the attention of so many people be used to show Seth Rogan is just another Jew at the center of a #MeToo campaign?
“What I can say is that I despise abuse and harassment and I would never cover or conceal the actions of someone doing it, or knowingly put someone in a situation where they were around someone like that,” Rogen, 39, said in the interview with The Sunday Times. The reporter had asked Rogen if he believed the allegations against Franco, to which Rogen also said he had no plans to work with the Palo Alto native again.
Trying to promote a 122k downvoted Christmas Special about elves trying to overthrow a white patriarch because he is sexist and terrible to women, in order to cover up his friendship with James Franco, with Antisemitism is bizarre but so is the examination of #MeToo era sexism all the while doing whatever the fuck this is:
However it wouldn't be the first of what is known as shock advertising.
Calvin Klein's advertisements used to include children as young as 15 in their sexualized advertising from as far back as the 80's involving Brooke Shields. Advertisers, psychiatrists, and social scientists have long debated the effectiveness of shock advertising. Some scientists argue that shocking ads of course evoke stronger feelings among the consumers. One finding suggests “shocking content in an advertisement significantly increases attention, benefits memory, and positively influences behavior.” The same study also shows that consumers are more likely to remember shocking advertising content over advertising content that is not shocking. Shock advertising could also refer to the usage of emotional appeals such as humor, sex or fear. Humor has for a long time been the most frequently used communication tool within advertising, and according to branch active people it is considered to be the most effective.
The effects of shock advertising could also be explained by the theory of selective perception. Selective perception is the process by which individual selects, organizes and evaluates stimuli from the external environment to provide meaningful experiences for him- or herself. This means that people focus in certain features of their environment to the exclusion of others. The consumer unconsciously chooses which information to notice and this kind of selection is dependent of different perceptual filters which are based on the consumer’s earlier experiences. One example of this kind of filter is perceptual defense. Perceptual defense is the tendency for people to protect themselves against ideas, objects or situations that are threatening. This means that if a consumer finds a certain kind of advertising content threatening or disturbing, this message will be filtered out. An example of this a heavy smoker who could be filtering out a picture of cancer sick lung since the content could be perceived as disturbing and uncomfortable.
TL;DR: Is the Antisemitism, and Seth Rogan's over the top mentioning of Judaism, around Santa Inc. just bait? I mean what the hell is this interview with Sarah?
“What I can say is that I despise abuse and harassment and I would never cover or conceal the actions of someone doing it, or knowingly put someone in a situation where they were around someone like that,” Rogen, 39, said in the interview with The Sunday Times. The reporter had asked Rogen if he believed the allegations against Franco, to which Rogen also said he had no plans to work with the Palo Alto native again.
Trying to promote a 122k downvoted Christmas Special about elves trying to overthrow a white patriarch because he is sexist and terrible to women, in order to cover up his friendship with James Franco, with Antisemitism is bizarre but so is the examination of #MeToo era sexism all the while doing whatever the fuck this is:
Calvin Klein's advertisements used to include children as young as 15 in their sexualized advertising from as far back as the 80's involving Brooke Shields. Advertisers, psychiatrists, and social scientists have long debated the effectiveness of shock advertising. Some scientists argue that shocking ads of course evoke stronger feelings among the consumers. One finding suggests “shocking content in an advertisement significantly increases attention, benefits memory, and positively influences behavior.” The same study also shows that consumers are more likely to remember shocking advertising content over advertising content that is not shocking. Shock advertising could also refer to the usage of emotional appeals such as humor, sex or fear. Humor has for a long time been the most frequently used communication tool within advertising, and according to branch active people it is considered to be the most effective.
The effects of shock advertising could also be explained by the theory of selective perception. Selective perception is the process by which individual selects, organizes and evaluates stimuli from the external environment to provide meaningful experiences for him- or herself. This means that people focus in certain features of their environment to the exclusion of others. The consumer unconsciously chooses which information to notice and this kind of selection is dependent of different perceptual filters which are based on the consumer’s earlier experiences. One example of this kind of filter is perceptual defense. Perceptual defense is the tendency for people to protect themselves against ideas, objects or situations that are threatening. This means that if a consumer finds a certain kind of advertising content threatening or disturbing, this message will be filtered out. An example of this a heavy smoker who could be filtering out a picture of cancer sick lung since the content could be perceived as disturbing and uncomfortable.
TL;DR: Is the Antisemitism, and Seth Rogan's over the top mentioning of Judaism, around Santa Inc. just bait? I mean what the hell is this interview with Sarah?