KR Korean population could drop by 85% in next 100 years: study - K-Pop and its consequences


1751480179797.webp

A street in Myeong-dong, Seoul

Ratio of 100 working individuals to 30 seniors now could rise to 140 seniors by 2100

South Korea’s population could plummet to just 15 percent of its current level by 2125 if the nation’s ongoing demographic decline continues unabated, according to a private think tank in Seoul on Wednesday.

In its latest long-term forecast, the Korean Peninsula Population Institute for Future used a cohort component method to project Korea’s demographic trends over the next century. This internationally recognized technique estimates future populations by incorporating factors such as birth rates, mortality rates and immigration patterns.

Under the institute’s worst-case scenario, South Korea’s population could drop to 7.53 million by 2125 — a sharp fall from the current 51.68 million. This would be even less than the current population of the city of Seoul alone, which is over 9.3 million.

Even under the most optimistic projection, the population would shrink to 15.73 million, or less than one-third of its current size. The median projection puts the 2125 population at 11.15 million.

The report also highlights the rapidly accelerating pace of population decline. In the median scenario, the population would fall by 30 percent by 2075, and then by more than half over the subsequent 50 years.

This decline is not only due to falling birth rates but also a compounding effect: With fewer people in each successive generation, the pool of potential parents shrinks, further accelerating the decrease.

South Korea’s demographic pyramid, once shaped like a "stingray" with a broad base of younger people, is forecast to morph into a “cobra” shape by 2125, with narrowing bands across all age groups and the population heavily skewed toward older groups.

1751480227908.webp

Population pyramids based on demographic scenarios anticipated in 2050, 2075, 2100 and 2125, from Population Report 2025 (Korean Peninsula Population Institute for Future)

The aging crisis is expected to deepen as well.

In 75 years, the worst forecast is that for every 100 people of working age — defined as 15 to 64 years old — there will be 140 seniors aged 65 or older.

Currently, 100 working-age individuals support around 30 seniors, indicating that South Korea is on track to become an “inverted pyramid” society, where the number of dependents far outnumbers those who provide support.

The report also incorporates a social sentiment analysis based on some 60,000 posts from the workplace community app Blind, focusing on the thoughts of people in their 20s to 40s about marriage and childbirth.

The findings revealed that younger generations now prioritize “money” and “housing” over “love” when discussing marriage. Financial burdens consistently emerged as the dominant concern in the conversations regarding childbirth.

The report concluded that decisions around marriage and parenting are increasingly influenced by economic conditions, rather than personal preference.

The institute proposed a series of urgent policy directions to tackle the crisis, such as expanding support to reduce the burden of childbirth and child-rearing and establishing a practical work-life balance culture. It also emphasized the importance of raising the retirement age and promoting continuous employment while reforming immigration policy.

Above all, the institute stressed the need to restructure the economy around productivity, moving away from a system dependent on demographic growth.

The stark projections underscore the urgent demographic challenge South Korea faces as it grapples with one of the world's lowest birth rates and fastest-aging populations.

As of 2024, South Korea’s total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — has ticked up slightly to 0.75, but it remains well below the replacement level of 2.1.





Which way, Korean man?
 
Just more proof that line-go-up is unsustainable and for all their power, governments can't entice people to reproduce if they aren't interested.
The government isn't really interested in natural population growth either, at least not if you compare their statements with their actions. Turns out that importing niggers and poojeets is cheaper short-term and these retards can only think short-term (muh re-election). You don't hate politicians and their enablers enough.
 
Just more proof that line-go-up is unsustainable and for all their power, governments can't entice people to reproduce if they aren't interested.
Korean corporate culture is fucking insane, 12-15 hour workdays are the norm. They make the Japanese look like workshy Spaniards.

The mouse utopia doesn't work.
 
The government isn't really interested in natural population growth either, at least not if you compare their statements with their actions. Turns out that importing niggers and poojeets is cheaper short-term and these retards can only think short-term (muh re-election). You don't hate politicians and their enablers enough.
The South Korean government has actually spent a fair amount and implemented a lot of policies (at least relative to other countries) trying to boost native birthrates and it's been completely unsuccessful.

Having kids is really time and money intensive, so it's just not feasible for the state to financially incentivize having children. In generations past, people WANTED kids for reasons that don't show up on a balance sheet.
 
Do the Koreans also do like we do and encourage their girls and women to spend their most productive reproduction years doing everything except reproducing? Go to college, go to grad school, get a job, climb the corporate ladder, make Administrator, then worry about getting a husband and kids, as though they are mere boxes on a to-do list to be ticked off?
 
The South Korean government has actually spent a fair amount and implemented a lot of policies (at least relative to other countries) trying to boost native birthrates and it's been completely unsuccessful.

Having kids is really time and money intensive, so it's just not feasible for the state to financially incentivize having children. In generations past, people WANTED kids for reasons that don't show up on a balance sheet.
You can't have a welfare state that requires men and women to both be working to make ends meet AND pay the massive taxes to support said welfare state AND have kids at the same time. The only solution at that point is H1B and mass immigration of the Third World to prop up your system.

Sorry, but the math don't lie.
 
The South Korean government has actually spent a fair amount and implemented a lot of policies (at least relative to other countries) trying to boost native birthrates and it's been completely unsuccessful.

Having kids is really time and money intensive, so it's just not feasible for the state to financially incentivize having children. In generations past, people WANTED kids for reasons that don't show up on a balance sheet.
People in piss poor African shitholes have 4-5 children. It's not about the money, and I find it both interesting and sad that intelligent people have been psyopped into thinking that it is, especially when the state supposedly has created programs to support families financially. No, the true reason why people don't have kids anymore is something else. If I had to guess, it's an outflow of the atomised urbanite lifestyle.
 
Korean corporate culture is fucking insane, 12-15 hour workdays are the norm. They make the Japanese look like workshy Spaniards.

The mouse utopia doesn't work.
The birthrates are not that much lower than in other highly industrialized countries, without mudslimes and africans pumping out kids like crazy, no european country would break a birthrate of 1,0 per woman.
 
Maybe if Korean men weren’t killing themselves over having no job mobility in competition with their H-1B overlords they might be able to marry and reproduce. Ah who am I kidding, get back to screwing in my Samsung TV’s screws gook. You will own nothing and be happy.
they participate in the culture that kills them. they play into hypercapitalist fixations and the confuscian caste system.

im sure when they dip down another 10% of the population they'll start fucking and having kids
 
The only solution at that point is H1B and mass immigration of the Third World to prop up your system.
Except that doesn't work either because the turd worlders just come in and abuse the welfare state, as we've all seen. The long and the short of it is that the entire developed world is completely fucked no matter what we do and it's going to require a massive degradation of our societies and standards of living for people to start pairing up out of necessity.
 
In generations past, people WANTED kids for reasons that don't show up on a balance sheet.
That's the real issue, all the government "enticement" is based around things that can be quantified, while things like "human happiness" and "marital satisfaction" that make up the bulk of the reason why people get married? Well, they can be defined and reported on, but, not reduced to controllable factors, no matter how hard the social tinkerers try.

Which is why you get those insanely out-of-touch articles where 80% of the populace report feeling economic strain and dissatisfaction, but the politicians and "experts" say they're wrong to think that because the stock market is still going up....
 
they participate in the culture that kills them. they play into hypercapitalist fixations and the confuscian caste system.

im sure when they dip down another 10% of the population they'll start fucking and having kids
Nonsense, the cattle with have AI girlfriends. If they’re good enough boys and save up enough goy points they may be able to afford a sex robot.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Qonas
Back