Cosplay Lori Cerda / Usagi Kou / Lori Lewd / Zero Two / Lori Lune and Kevin Hanft / AdollaSkye / Skye / Krook3dKev - 37-year-old batshit crazy Sailor Moon cosplayer & e-thot with 20 years of drama, 27-year-old simp manchild cosplay martyr fiancé, Momokun's archenemies

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Man, after the latest, daily lore post (seriously @OhGodHowDidThisGetHere you the real MVP out here, doing daily dives into the trenches of Lori Lunacy), and holy fuck.
All I can say is that as if it wasn't obvious before, there's no way in fuck she ever broke her back.
With all those "clapbacks" on her feed, it's evident that Lori just has no spine to even break.

And then there's this:
"The worker at Dunkin' Donuts called me a liar! :mad:"
Lori, it's literally a fucking Dunkin' Donuts. What could the employee have possibly even accused you of lying about?
What kind of donut you wanted? Asking for extra caramel drizzle in your iced coffee? Glaze?
Did they compare IRL you to your pictures, Lori??
I know it's stupid, there are no answers, and it bears absolutely no importance to the overall scheme of things, but I just.
I just want to know.
Because I, for the life of me, cannot understand how this "altercation" occurred in her head (because we all know it didn't actually happen), and how this imaginary slight was apparently so impactful to her day that she had to tweet about it.

Listen, Lori - because I know either you or Kevin check here rather often - I won't sit here and tell you that "Lying is bad" or whatever. Everyone has lied at some point, and they will go on to tell more lies later on in life for a variety of reasons. Even pathological liars can't fully control their habit and often need a wrangler to keep them in check and teach them accountability, I get that.
But you're something else, m'dear.
Because the only thing that's worse than a pathological liar,
is a pathological liar that's really, really shitty at lying.
Just gets sad at that point, tbh.
In that sad = funny kinda way, of course.
 
Last edited:
Man, after the latest, daily lore post (seriously @OhGodHowDidThisGetHere you the real MVP out here, doing daily dives into the trenches of Lori Lunacy), and holy fuck.
All I can say is that as if it wasn't obvious before, there's no way in fuck she ever broke her back.
With all those "clapbacks" on her feed, it's evident that Lori just has no spine to even break.

And then there's this:
"The worker at Dunkin' Donuts called me a liar! :mad:"
Lori, it's literally a fucking Dunkin' Donuts. What could the employee have possibly even accused you of lying about?
What kind of donut you wanted? Asking for extra caramel drizzle in your iced coffee? Glaze?
Did they compare IRL you to your pictures, Lori??
I know it's stupid, there are no answers, and it bears absolutely no importance to the overall scheme of things, but I just.
I just want to know.
Because I, for the life of me, cannot understand how this "altercation" occurred in her head (because we all know it didn't actually happen), and how this imaginary slight was apparently so impactful to her day that she had to tweet about it.

Listen, Lori - because I know either you or Kevin check here rather often - I won't sit here and tell you that "Lying is bad" or whatever. Everyone has lied at some point, and they will go on to tell more lies later on in life for a variety of reasons. Even pathological liars can't fully control their habit and often need a wrangler to keep them in check and teach them accountability, I get that.
But you're something else, m'dear.
Because the only thing that's worse than a pathological liar,
is a pathological liar that's really, really shitty at lying.
Just gets sad at that point, tbh.
In that sad = funny kinda way, of course.
It had something to do with Lori wanting to purchase a $3 dunkin covid mask in person at her location that was only available online and the poor employee had no idea what she was talking about. Highly doubt they straight up called her a “liar”, she’s just the ultimate Karen and has to exaggerate because she wanted a $3 mask with proceeds going to charity for free despite being too stupid to read it was an online only offer.
 
@OhGodHowDidThisGetHere and @misskittymoxie have absolutely savaged Lori, and it's hilarious watching both her and Kevin trying to ignore the thread on their main accounts when they're desperately F5ing as fast as they can.

It's trashy as fuck to be rude to retail workers and wait staff. Even if somebody makes a mistake, it's not a big fucking deal. It's not the end of the world because your smoothie order was wrong. The only people I see being rude to service workers are terminally insecure wretches like Lori. Watching how someone treats service staff is a huge tell about their personality.
 
America is basically the same. You put into Social Security (basically subsidized retirement) when you work, and if your employer offers it, you can put more money into a 401K (or a Roth IRA) on your own for retirement purposes. I don't remember if you can get SS if you didn't pay into the system.

You can’t. SS retirement requires 40 credits which is 20 years worth of work. You don’t pay, you can’t get it. However you can get a spousal benefit when one spouse retires, and are entitled to 50 percent father PIA (primary insurance amount). But that requires the other spouse to have paid into the system. If neither had paid into it, you’re at the mercy of ssi if your assets are low enough. Also, people on ssi after 65 and older are entitled to Medicare even if they haven’t paid into that.

source: am a mod elsewhere on the web for social security related things.
 
Every time I see these ridiculous outfits I can only think “sex worker”. Which, she is, so it fits.
CB2B8114-C6F4-4C8B-B93D-575D35D669B4.jpeg

Setting aside any personal beliefs that one may has about whoring/sex work
I’m a feminist, would probably even label me a radfem as I’m anti-troon and believe sex work is generally harmful to women. So, you know, a feminist who makes sense BUT I DIGRESS
I am absolutely amazed at the clothing they’re allowed to sell on Instagram.
9CAF5DC9-32BD-4CFC-B243-7DDE93A56D5E.jpeg33540C75-DC21-4BC0-ABFF-B030D6F74366.jpeg
This literally all looks like stripper wear. The only place you used to be able to find stuff like this was in Las Vegas/LA, NYC, and if you were lucky your town smut shop. Now they sell it tweens on Instagram. And the women that model it sell the idea to tweens on Instagram. Sigh. A sign of the times, I guess.

Eta I’m 25 so it’s not like I’m being a boomer. I just care about women, and the girls and women of tomorrow.

Eta saying I’m 25 is not a power level. There’s two categories of things you shouldn’t share: things that could be used to identify you, and things you don’t want the rest of us to make fun of.
 
Last edited:
Every time I see these ridiculous outfits I can only think “sex worker”. Which, she is, so it fits.
View attachment 1943904

Now, setting aside any personal beliefs I may have about whoring/sex work
I’m a feminist, would probably even label me a radfem as I’m anti-troon and believe sex work is generally harmful to women. So, you know, a feminist who makes sense BUT I DIGRESS
I am absolutely amazed at the clothing they’re allowed to sell on Instagram.
View attachment 1943905View attachment 1943906
This literally all looks like stripper wear. The only place you used to be able to find stuff like this was in Las Vegas/LA, NYC, and if you were lucky your town smut shop. Now they sell it tweens on Instagram. And the women that model it sell the idea to tweens on Instagram. Sigh. A sign of the times, I guess.
Yeah, you hit it pretty much square on the head. Just preparing the next generation of soon-to-be-trafficked little girls for their future. Its sickening seeing literal children throw on e-girl makeup and put on these stripper boots and bodysuits. All the women who narrowly avoided an abysmal existence as a sex worker now will have to watch children be groomed socially, but more hardcore than ever before. It shouldn't be fucking legal. God, I'm livid. Anyone who sells this without age restriction or shills like Looni deserves to be put against the wall. Speaking of Looni selling stripper clothes to children, why have we never seen her tag anything as an ad? Isn't that illegal? It's clear she is being given directives on what to post, when and what to say, etc.
 
Every time I see these ridiculous outfits I can only think “sex worker”. Which, she is, so it fits.
View attachment 1943904

Now, setting aside any personal beliefs I may have about whoring/sex work
I’m a feminist, would probably even label me a radfem as I’m anti-troon and believe sex work is generally harmful to women. So, you know, a feminist who makes sense BUT I DIGRESS
I am absolutely amazed at the clothing they’re allowed to sell on Instagram.
View attachment 1943905View attachment 1943906
This literally all looks like stripper wear. The only place you used to be able to find stuff like this was in Las Vegas/LA, NYC, and if you were lucky your town smut shop. Now they sell it tweens on Instagram. And the women that model it sell the idea to tweens on Instagram. Sigh. A sign of the times, I guess.

Eta I’m 25 so it’s not like I’m being a boomer. I just care about women, and the girls and women of tomorrow.

Oh boy she’s wearing blue again and you just know that caption means something. They always do, otherwise she doesn’t put them. “She lOoKs SO goOD iN bLUe!” Give it a month or two, her hair is gonna be dyed to match because she just has to do the “current” color better than the salty worthless peasants who hate her. We bow down to your color mastery, empress. Please, step on us with your carefully curated aesthetic flavor of the week that seems to match whichever e-girl you’re hoes mad at for the last 24 hours.

On the subject of tweens, I take solace in the fact that all of the tweens/teens I encounter at the mall don’t really wear this kind of stuff. It’s mostly croptops with mom jeans and the weird middle parts from the 90s. The clothing that 30+ year old influencers think gen Z wants to wear versus what they actually wear is starkly different. I think I most often see this style worn by 22-ish year olds. The ones who have just moved out of their parent’s house with their friend, and now that their mom/dad aren’t berating them for the clothes they’re wearing they swing to the opposite end of the pendulum.
Yeah, you hit it pretty much square on the head. Just preparing the next generation of soon-to-be-trafficked little girls for their future. Its sickening seeing literal children throw on e-girl makeup and put on these stripper boots and bodysuits. All the women who narrowly avoided an abysmal existence as a sex worker now will have to watch children be groomed socially, but more hardcore than ever before. It shouldn't be fucking legal. God, I'm livid. Anyone who sells this without age restriction or shills like Looni deserves to be put against the wall. Speaking of Looni selling stripper clothes to children, why have we never seen her tag anything as an ad? Isn't that illegal? It's clear she is being given directives on what to post, when and what to say, etc.
Well, first of all she doesn’t have a creator account. Her account is still a personal one so she cannot form brand partnerships (the ones that display “in a paid partnership with ______” under the username when they make a post.) This is likely because to do so means she needs to actually be official about stuff and unfortunately her reputation is dead in the water already. Or perhaps she has a superiority complex when it comes to having a personal acc vs. creator acc. OR it’s because she doesn’t want people looking up her statistics on Social Blade which you need to have a business/creator account to get stats on. Here’s mine for contrast. There’s a LOT of information you can get on accounts with this site, but you have to check in periodically (as you can see mine skips like 3 months). You can look up Her Twitter Data though!

And then on top of that, I’m not sure if it’s illegal to not tag something as an ad. It’s likely that she’s still buying the clothes from DK but with a discounted price. They’re not paying her actual money, just giving her a 20-50% discount (the amount depends on how credible the company is. 20-30% is shady, 50% is understandable for small business). My Insta is based around my “fashion” choices/where to buy them, and I have gotten discounts in exchange for making posts about the products. I’ve never used the #ad, and the companies who are legitimately compensating me I have a “brand partnership” function for. If she has discount codes that are unique to her, she could be making a small commission (I do.) But again, I still don’t know if legally that requires an “#ad” since it’s paid on commission, not upfront.

Edit: the quote message messed up.
 
Every time I see these ridiculous outfits I can only think “sex worker”. Which, she is, so it fits.
View attachment 1943904

Now, setting aside any personal beliefs I may have about whoring/sex work
I’m a feminist, would probably even label me a radfem as I’m anti-troon and believe sex work is generally harmful to women. So, you know, a feminist who makes sense BUT I DIGRESS
I am absolutely amazed at the clothing they’re allowed to sell on Instagram.
View attachment 1943905View attachment 1943906
This literally all looks like stripper wear. The only place you used to be able to find stuff like this was in Las Vegas/LA, NYC, and if you were lucky your town smut shop. Now they sell it tweens on Instagram. And the women that model it sell the idea to tweens on Instagram. Sigh. A sign of the times, I guess.

Eta I’m 25 so it’s not like I’m being a boomer. I just care about women, and the girls and women of tomorrow.
not even good stripper wear, stripper wear is all about not being a pain in the ass to pull out.
this.
this looks like a huge pain . and it looks like fabric that makes you smell of sweat very quickly
 
My Insta is based around my “fashion” choices/where to buy them, and I have gotten discounts in exchange for making posts about the products. I’ve never used the #ad, and the companies who are legitimately compensating me I have a “brand partnership” function for. If she has discount codes that are unique to her, she could be making a small commission (I do.) But again, I still don’t know if legally that requires an “#ad” since it’s paid on commission, not upfront.

Thank you for all the info as always! Can I ask you to describe real quick the differences between the kinds of arrangements you/anyone might have with a company? Like is #ad required only when there’s a contract, or? It seems like there’s a lot of gray areas but maybe I’m just not getting it.
 
Ready for some loony Lori news? Let's get this shitshow started.

:lunacy: Lori The KopyKat Kou: Guess what @misskittymoxie's old nickname is? Bloo. Given Lori's history of stalking and skinwalking as Kitty with blue hair, I'm going to assume that specific mentions of the color blue are likely a weird passive-aggressive digs at Kitty.

"I look pretty nice in bloo blue" - Lori the Creep
blue1.png

On the topic of Lori stalking Kitty, I found this example of Lori using DARVO to blame Kitty to avoid taking responsibility for herself and her reprehensible actions.

"I really only have one boundary, other than dont fucking hit on me or talk to me flirtatiously, and thats i refuse to have anything to do with anyone thats involved with my abuser from 2017 kitty varney. If any of you ever decide to be her friend remove me first. Respect peoples wishes to not have anything to do with you if youre friends with their abuser"
- Lori The Liar and Hypocrite


lori abuser kitty varney1574190893965.png

blue2.png

blue3.jpg

limecrimelip.png

"Oof, not too bad in blue"
blue5.jpg

gif blue.gif

:lunacy: Daily Degeneracy: Here's your daily helping of Lori bullshit. Guess what the name of @misskittymoxie's car is? Little Beep. Perhaps this and Lori's mention of "blue" are coincidences. Yet looking through Lori's pictures and hashtags in comparison to Kitty's makes it unsettlingly clear that Lori was (is?) fixated on Kitty. Either way, I want to document these "coincidences" for future reference.

"Beep beep lazy crazy"
152836769_3688654134585310_234385277620008417_n.jpg

"Beep beep"
153159878_119968980128636_861739559467253009_n.jpg

"Ass on the feeed"
twit.png

twit1.jpeg

twit2.jpeg

spicyfate.jpg

152931155_133250941936619_887114723592225951_n.jpg

153728120_941762706632295_6886448094906628664_n.jpg

"Wink wink bb Saber"
ezgif.com-gif-maker.gif

ezgif.com-gif-maker (1).gif

:lunacy: Lori The Narcissist: What a healthy and loving relationship.

IG User: "Lucky he who makes love to you."
Lori: "oh he knows"

oh he knows.png

RUN WHILE YOU STILL CAN, KEVIN

:lunacy: Dollskill Elf Ears: Is controversial clothing company Dollskill trolling Lori again or is it just wishful thinking? The first known incident of Dollskill trolling Lori was when they alluded to her being 43 years old. EDIT: I agree with @Gaitlord that this is very likely a coincidence but knowing that it pisses Lori off makes it worth mentioning.

dk2.png

43yearsold-1612482479957.jpeg

dk3.png

dk1.png

:lunacy: 35 Years Old: Lori insinuated that people hate her because she's 35 years old and compared herself to Rihanna. That's strange. I thought people hated Lori because she was an abusive psychopath who poses a threat to others. Hmm... And, yes, Lori - you and Rihanna have so much in common.

:story:

Twitter User: "Rihanna is 33 with no kids. Y'all hear me? Rihanna's a billionaire"

Lori: "Shit, based on my haters logic she [Rihanna] has to retire in 2 years xD KEEP SHINING GIRL"

twitter1.png

twitter2.png

:lunacy: Kevin The EBoy: Last I recall, Kevin was a "boi," not a "boy." So, is he an "eboi"? Is that a thing?

eboy.png

eboy2.png

eboy3.jpg
 
Last edited:
I don’t know, I’m leaning towards these aren’t coincidences and she is still obsessed with @misskittymoxie and these are lame attempts at trolling her. But I don’t think Dollskill cares enough about crazy Lori to even think of trolling her. She’s just another living advertisement for them, that’s all. They’re not going to go out of their way to correct a commenter on lori’s actual age lol they just don’t want to alienate anymore potential customers by leaving ageist comments on their account unchecked. They’re hated enough as it is. And the elf ears are just a common trend amongst their targeted demographic.

Anyway, can someone please teach this crazy bitch how to do winged eyeliner on hooded eyes? Her eye make up is fucking terrible. Far worse than most teens’ and she’s supposed to be this cosplay elder? But knowing how delusional Lori is, she probably views hooded eyes as a flaw or something idiotic like that and would deny even having them.
 
Thank you for all the info as always! Can I ask you to describe real quick the differences between the kinds of arrangements you/anyone might have with a company? Like is #ad required only when there’s a contract, or? It seems like there’s a lot of gray areas but maybe I’m just not getting it.
Absolutely! I’m happy to share my knowledge to aid in your entertainment of the Looni Goddess and all other milk consumption in which you choose to partake.

The short answer is this:
FTC guidelines also affect influencers

223A85B4-B59F-4697-AA70-A92756C11F95.jpeg

CC: Basically, the FTC requires you to disclose when you have any financial, employment, personal, or family relationship with a brand.

This can include everything from being paid and receiving a gift, even if you think your evaluations are unbiased or you weren’t specifically asked to review a product.- later.com

95C9BECA-8A31-4AA4-818D-65048B2A1351.jpeg

CC: Well, the latest advice from the FTC is that a simple explanation, such as: “Thanks to [insert brand] for the free product,” is often enough.

Equally, you can still use terms like “advertisement,” “ad,” and “sponsored,” so long as they are clearly visible to anyone who engages with your content. -later.com

This can look like just having “ad” in the post, OR you can also have a recent addition called “branded content” which
DEBEDFF5-BE49-49F8-BE79-E4FBEB6EDD4A.jpeg
780E1796-3C0F-4ADE-B41F-BA76733A08DB.jpeg
6DC14F67-4128-43F1-933E-3731868C5411.jpeg
03F9057A-E1F7-4B93-B86C-D45918CCAE48.jpeg

A lot of influencers and smaller (sometimes sketchy) brands shirk this by calling it a “collaboration”. You’ll often see “DM or Email for Collab” in larger influencer account bios.
AD3C2A69-9ADF-4006-B4E7-D4184152346F.jpeg


I haven’t fully researched the legal legitimacy of collab, but if you scroll comments sections you’ll occasionally see comments from weird spammy usernames saying “OmG wE LOve yOur feED uwu DM foR cOlLAb!”. I did decide to respond to one (for science...and attention!) and
E61D69DC-B2F7-42E8-AF62-E7438DD74980.jpeg
51BD06AA-2A13-4532-9391-85785E9BFE3F.jpeg
<<Kitty’s Note: this was the company who made the mask I wore for my “sailor moon” You can see this mask in the next spoiler.>>

Again, most of these types of influencer hawks are looking to gain either free content/rep/etc. and promise smaller accounts the ability to fulfill their desire to gain more followers.

Most ‘influencers’ are posting images with flattering reviews in an attempt to get brand-senpai to notice them. These “ads” do not indicate a relationship with the company, but rather are an attempt to get the company to reshare their post in an attempt to gain followers. These, afaik, are not actually ads.

Some companies have a natural relationship with social media, and have a hashtag specifically for people who want their posts —that aren’t affiliated with them, are not an ad, but by nature show off the product—to be shared.
C237A14A-A538-4492-A2CA-A7333A1A3EC6.jpeg
40EA0B0C-8731-46C4-9D29-26637F6BA446.jpeg

NOW THAT WE HAVE SOME CONTEXT!
Let’s apply this lesson to our Divine Bovine who cannot stop regurgitating DK clothing/affiliated brands.


So we’ll assume she’s following FTC guidelines. I’ve gathered some shots of her most recent caption posts to insta.
28F145B1-D7F6-48B5-9222-0AC78FEC59A0.jpeg
6D234C70-F0B9-40EE-86E6-BBB4B4AC9461.jpeg
B32D946D-4C83-407E-948E-CF375EE87B96.jpeg
D45D31B5-A266-40FF-9C88-83086BD59292.jpeg
E24396AC-8DFC-4E81-BB87-705CC266EF47.jpeg

These are the brands she’s repping. If she’s following FTC guidelines, these companies actually have nothing to do with her other than the very occasional reshare of her photos, which includes tagging her at most. Therefore we can assume that she’s not actually affiliated with these companies, she’s buying these items at full price or regular consumer discount. I decided to look further into it, and found that each of these companies (all in the DK umbrella) have only posted her a few times within
DK POSTS (2 count)
1B016B19-DA28-41D3-8A20-6FC934FDA6C6.jpeg
8B105FF9-8B8D-4550-B1B4-D778D4433F05.jpeg

YRU SHOES POSTS (3 count)
47223B6E-07C7-408D-953B-FBEDBB418101.jpeg
7B3F7FB7-83E0-4B92-952C-CDD6F53EDC91.jpeg
47B47009-93AC-4DD5-B390-0F2CE863FF6B.jpeg

CURRENT MOOD POSTS (1 count)
50D838B5-6041-4EDA-892C-69CAAEC7188B.jpeg

CLUB EXX POSTS (3 count)
5D25A816-6A68-4B31-8D77-EEF59B7E4E53.jpeg
097F3F14-656C-4DD6-9CAE-2775BCF60BF1.jpeg
784812A1-459B-47D5-8AD4-FFE70EE0CBAD.jpeg

SUGAR THRILLZ POSTS
-none-

Only one of them gave her a discount code, and they haven’t posted her to their page. It is possible it was shared to their story. The account is small, though, and if she reached out to them (instead of the other way around) they
3F23FA0F-96D5-4C10-BF44-AD10A16D4848.jpeg

These companies post content gathered from so many accounts constantly to get posted once or twice is “just a nice thing that happens”. These ‘influencers’ buy the products at full price, or with a coupon that is available to the general consumer population. It would be way more believable for her to be in a paid partnership with these companies if her content was getting consistently shared and not just random photos posted same day (usually from these companies scrolling through their recent hashtag for whatever suits their fancy.) This would also explain how she’s not receiving new, not yet released products to promo before launch to build hype.

One last thing to keep in mind is that she’s still a personal account, not a creator account, so despite her having “100k” followers she cannot use the “branded content” tool. This means that brands who operate with integrity (which is definitely not DK) are not likely to be interested in working with her.
CD6DA27D-A8F1-4CC0-8C89-63541CE53FF9.jpeg

Hope this helps!

[obligatory edit for attachments because i upload too many photos]
 
Last edited:
Thanks so much, that was really interesting to learn!

One last thing to keep in mind is that she’s still a personal account, not a creator account, so despite her having “100k” followers she cannot use the “branded content” tool. This means that brands who operate with integrity (which is definitely not DK) are not likely to be interested in working with her.

I’m baffled why she wouldn’t get a creator account. Do you have thoughts about that?

Also, kind of unrelated and definitely take with a grain of salt due to pandemic but does Lori ever leave the house? Like at all?
 
Hey, I noticed Kevin forgot to crop out his address in his new instagram post.
View attachment 1912418
I turned up the contrast and clarity to see if I could make out anything. I only got vague outlines of letters but what stood out to me is the last two numbers of the address. I could tell those were at least a XX'40' or XX'10'. When I looked closer I thought I could see a 5 or 3 at the beginning.

So, I just googled apartments in West Valley City, UT. The only address ending in '10' that looked similar was Enclave at Redwood. Coincidentally, it starts with a 3. 3810 is pretty on the money. I went through their photo gallery and compared them to Lori and Kevin's photos, lo and behold they are VERY similar.

3810 S Redwood Rd, West Valley City, UT 84119
View attachment 1912421 <--- this was me trying to see if the address text shrunk down looked similar. To me it does, what do you think?

Bathroom:
View attachment 1912192View attachment 1912198
View attachment 1912197View attachment 1912199
Same layout with the door facing the shower, matching grey counters and white sink. The hand towel rack is just fixed on the opposite wall as shown in the promo photos I think. Toilet would be next to the shower. The bathroom closet is either sliding white wood doors or accordion doors in the hallway as opposed to being in the restroom. Take note of the light switch here. You'll see it in the Enclave photo gallery.

Kitchen:
View attachment 1912224View attachment 1912196
View attachment 1912225View attachment 1912298
There's many variations in kitchen floor plans so I'm not 100% about this part of the house. I'm inclined to think its the same due to the flooring. The cabinetry looks newer but cheap. The oven and fridge are next to each other and the dishwasher is facing the window which also lends to this theory.

Living Room/Front Room:
View attachment 1912195View attachment 1912368
This layout ticks almost every box so far and we haven't even gotten to bedrooms. Assuming the mirror Kevin is using is propped up by the kitchen (given the fluorescent lighting), this would put the patio behind him as you see here. The only thing unseen as of yet is the hallway and fireplace.

Bedrooms:
View attachment 1912191
This is Kevin's room, right next to Lori's. I assume this is separate because we never see his props or artwork hanging in Lori's photos.
View attachment 1912193View attachment 1912194

We've seen Lori's room at 100 different angles but I put these here so you can take note of the doors in the hallway and the reflection of the sliding door closets. Everything up to this point leads me to believe this is the place. What do you all think? Anyone better at this than me? I don't usually do this kind of sleuthing but I felt the need to teach Kevin a lesson. I don't consider this a doxx cause I'm not 100% certain. I don't have any metadata to work with, just this tinfoil. Now, if someone would like to verify this information... do it. LOL.
You'd think they woulda been chased out by now based on how conservative Utah is
 
Last edited:
You'd think they woulda been chased out by now based on how conservative Utah is
Utah likes to pretend to love these misfits in hopes that they will someday convert and have 14 kids for the Church to brainwash.

A lot of trash get by in Utah because of this. There are plenty of people who will let them grift in hopes they will feel grateful enough to join the LDS. There are also plenty of telemarketing jobs for people with no fucking ambition.
 
Back