Lots of problems in modern society are caused by an inability to address uncomfortable truths

[futaconnoisseur]

A good deal of issues in modern society stem from uncomfortable truths being ignored. Violent crime is a good example of this. America spiked in violent crime due to large quantities of blacks moving into urban areas during the 1960s. There's a good book titled "the rise and fall of violent crime in America" that discusses this along with statistics.




Instead of acknowledging the issue, progressives ignore it and pretend that the reason blacks go to prison in higher rates is due to systemic racism. This has led to radical crime reform in ultra libreal states like California and New York, which has in turn led to more violent crime.

The current "population collapse" as some would refer to it is another good example of this. The obvious cause for the population decreasing, is government programs + equity jobs have given women more independence, thus there's less need to marry a man in exchange for resources like in the past. Since there is no easy way to acknowledge this issue, politicians instead blame pornography. There's a strong desire among certain groups to ban pornography because they claim that it's "making men lazy." This of course is idiotic. Pornography in a society where the majority of young men are single, is arguably a good means of preventing a large rise in violent and sexual crimes. We already know that the rate of rapes massively decreased after internet porn became popular.

Department’s authoritative National Crime Victimization Survey, since 1995, the U.S. sexual assault rate has fallen 44 percent

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...evidence-mounts-more-porn-less-sexual-assault
I can only imagine how much worse the rate would be if you somehow found a way to ban pornography. (Which is virtually impossible)
Men not watching porn is not going to make them magically attractive to women and save the birth rates.


Another truth that has only recently become uncomfortable, is the fact that being overweight is unhealthy. This is specifically in regards to women.

There's been a massive overcorrection in response to certain anorexic trends of the 2000s. Acknowledging that obesity/being overweight is unhealthy is now a massive taboo. Most men nowadays, have been brainwashed into believing that overweight women have natural and healthy bodies. So even addressing that a certain weight is objectively overweight is a current day blasphemy.



There's even a large abundance of pseudo science that has immerged claiming being overweight is actually healthier than being skinny. Oftentimes on social media, you see actual healthy women being accused of either looking like a child or being anorexic. Good example below




Modern society is being destroyed by an inability to acknowledge uncomfortable truths. You cannot correct a problem if you do not address the cause.

 

[Wild at Heart]

A big part of this is women's ability to vote and their entrance into the political sphere. Women are generally bad at comprehending or even trying to comprehend the great evils that exist in the world. Their biology makes them excellent at finding evil on the small scale to protect the home and the young. They are also constantly trying to not stick out, so they adapt the most common and inoffensive opinions en masse. Simply put, they have bad survival instincts and rely on men to watch for threats. This biological reliance clashes with modern independent feminism and creates a voter bloc that has absolutely no survival instinct and is fueled by good intentions.


Men are meant to identify threats at large and apply cynicism and realism to stamp out said threats. Forces such as crime, war, and health are large scale topics that require realism, cynicism, and skepticism to tackle.

We have a large coalition of weak men who were conditioned into abandoning their masculine realism and skepticism for a more attractive optimism and ignorance.

As I get older I realize more and more it is not "sexist" to understand that men have been equipped with the tools to combat evil on a large scale while women are equipped to combat it on a more intimate and small scale. Politics used to be a masculine fatherly force that called out issues with accuracy and curtness. Now it is feminine, passive aggressive, and self destructive. Women drive discussion nowadays and shame men who fall out of line. The Longhouse theory and such

 

[C. G. B. Spender]

How many of these issues in USA or west in general were actually caused by infiltration of societies by USSR in the past or Chinese Communist Party who carried the torch of these operations. They studied really hard how to strike at all the weak points slowly and decay them. USSR focused historically more on class struggle and realized at some point that American obsession with race can be exploited, how women are super easy to manipulate for authorities, education system was relatively easy to fuck up etc. Every piece of society they could divide, they divided and that shit is still going on at full force and infiltration is at such levels it will be hard to repair. Arguably one of the worst, if not the worst way of decaying western societies was infiltrating enviromental groups because that way you can weaponize the naive youth to target almost everything from heavy industry to food production, thats why you dont see such groups in the public eye in chinese/russian media.

Through platforms like tiktok almost every kid carries a little communist in their pocket whispering all kinds of shit about things i mentioned above in their little ears. Its like the classic quote of "owning a TV is like having a jew in your living room" but shocking levels of more effective brainwashing.

 

[Rootless Cosmopolitan]

I think you’re oversimplifying the birth rate thing. Birth rates are crashing in countries where women have no rights.

Check out the Rat Behavioral Sink experiments for an alternative explanation

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

A big part of this is women's ability to vote and their entrance into the political sphere

This. Once politics has become entirely centred on emotions there is no way to argue on issues that cause discomfort. The only way to get a change is show a minority doing something so vile that even women let go of their empathy.

 

[Wild at Heart]

This. Once politics has become entirely centred on emotions there is no way to argue on issues that cause discomfort. The only way to get a change is show a minority doing something so vile that even women let go of their empathy.

Exactly. And I don't want to just shit on women, but if you think of the American voting population as a big pie chart, women make up a large section, and they are easily manipulated. By the time they received the right to vote, 100 years of marketing science existed which was specifically engineered to get women to buy things. If you can convince them to buy something you can convince them to vote for something. The women I talk to see politics as another source of drama, another passing interest that they can use to personify themself. BLM, Illegal Aliens, Eggs, all this shit is a talking point to make them look worldly and used as a fashion accessory. They don't hold it with the same weight as men do. They aren't going to war, they aren't dying protecting the law or their home.

Taking a mass media class (which I highly recommend) teaches you that marketing has a stranglehold on women, using tools like dread, insecurity, FOMO, beauty, jealousy, and vicarious scenarios. These can all be applied to politics to condition them to vote for anything and everything. The powers that be understand this and have started weaponizing the feminine bloc. Nowadays, because issues are so severe, women and their children's safety is directly affected and they voted for their best interests over appeasing the social machine. Cartel abductions, human trafficking, men in their bathrooms, locker rooms, and sports. These things hurt women and children and they have had enough, thus the rise in the female vote for Trump.

This rise in feminism and the use of cancel culture in 2015 onward can be attributed to women receiving a larger voice and starting to police social media and politics as a whole. Male allies and even neutral silent men started thinking they wont get laid or find a partner if they have problematic views, so they started flocking to liberal politics. Liberalism became cool, because it was backed by women and culture leaders who were too afraid to go against the grain. Media picked up the narrative and websites started censoring or punishing people for misogyny. No doubt foreign powers started stoking this flame and radicalizing people on Tik Tok (yes, really) Facebook, and Twitter. Anti American sentiment was sewn, and now yelling "I LOVE AMERICA" is no longer seen as silly , but "cringe".

The radicalization of men to the left seems to stem from non masculine men seeking a means of power or respect. Debate bros and politics bros are seen as "distinguished" and worth listening to, so leftist men who cannot wow with physical presence or confidence seek out alternative means to social status and subsequent mate selection. Their wet dream is using debate to own a chud and pull his pants down in front of women to look superior. They move in circles of the "correct" politics where they have to be the most liberal and out liberal the others, never saying anything wrong or they will be cast out. My liberal friend faced such consequences when he said "faggot" jokingly in his little liberal group chat and was removed from participating ever again. All that effort lost over one word. Everyone playing that game is perpetuating the endless woke entropy that prevents serious, curt discussion.

Shit, try to show people documented crime statistics from the most diligent stat takers and they will pull 100 reasons out of their ass why the FBI is wrong and they are right. People are too scared to agree with the truth because it will lose them social status and mate selection. Which begs the question , does introducing women into politics or any concept directly sour the sincerity of said concept by creating competition for mates, social status, and appeasement rituals? Another topic we need to address head on so we can be aware of it and forge something stronger moving forward. Women are here to stay, and should have a voice, but everyone should be aware biological forces are at play and can affect one's mind and opinions.

 

[Blindeye]

The average liberal is categorically unable to comprehend the idea that it can be cruel to be kind

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

The average liberal is categorically unable to comprehend the idea that it can be cruel to be kind

The democratic immigration policy is amazingly similar to the pet adoption policy of a crazy cat lady, but with humans. It's a sickness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_hoarding

Animal hoarding, sometimes called Noah syndrome,[1] is keeping a higher-than-usual number of animals as domestic pets without the ability to properly house or care for them, while at the same time denying this inability.

 

[greatUncleShitHeel]

This. Once politics has become entirely centred on emotions there is no way to argue on issues that cause discomfort. The only way to get a change is show a minority doing something so vile that even women let go of their empathy.

I generally don't even believe in universal suffrage anymore due to this. If you vote based on what gives you warm fuzzies, rather than the long term you're going to fuck it up.

 

[Butterschmalz]

Comfortable truths or not. Addressed or ignored. All it takes is some 400 years...