Law McCabe Seeks Immunity for Testimony in Hearing Over FBI Handling of Clinton Email Probe

e928d783fb2b12e4ab4f9fee896f446d.png
Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe has requested the Senate Judiciary Committee provide him with immunity from prosecution in exchange for testifying at an upcoming congressional hearing focused on how senior officials at the FBI and Justice Department handled the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server, according to a letter obtained by CNN.
"Under the terms of such a grant of use immunity, no testimony or other information provided by Mr. McCabe could be used against him in a criminal case," wrote Michael Bromwich, a lawyer for McCabe, to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, who has requested McCabe testify next week.

Grassley, an Iowa Republican, has quietly requested that several former officials appear in front of the Judiciary Committee to discuss the long-awaited internal Justice Department report, which sources say will detail a series of missteps surrounding the Justice Department and FBI's investigation into Clinton's handling of classified information while secretary of state.
The inspector general's report has not yet been released, but Grassley has invited former FBI Director James Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch to testify as well, according to those familiar with the plans.

The stakes for McCabe's appearance, however, are particularly high. The former No. 2 at the FBI is entangled in a separate criminal investigation stemming from an earlier report from the inspector general's office that concluded he lied to internal investigators. McCabe has steadfastly denied wrongdoing, but any congressional testimony he provides could have serious implications for his criminal case.

"Mr. McCabe is willing to testify, but because of the criminal referral, he must be afforded suitable legal protection," Bromwich wrote to Grassley. "This is a textbook case for granting use immunity. . . . If this Committee is unwilling or unable to obtain such an order, then Mr. McCabe will have to no choice but to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination."
If McCabe invokes his Fifth Amendment right instead of answering certain questions, it could set up a contentious confrontation with lawmakers. They could serve him with a subpoena and if he continues to refuse to testify, lawmakers could pursue a contempt resolution against him and refer the matter for prosecution by the DC US Attorney's Office or enforce the subpoena through civil action in federal court.

Bromwich's letter also makes clear that McCabe is willing to provide emails that "demonstrate that Mr. McCabe advised former Director Comey, in October 2016, that Mr. McCabe was working with FBI colleagues to correct inaccuracies before certain media stories were published."
The discrepancy between Comey's recollection and McCabe's statements to internal investigators about authorizing FBI officials to talk to a reporter about an ongoing investigation regarding the Clinton Foundation in 2016 served as one of the linchpins to the inspector general's earlier report finding he "lacked candor."

Grassley wrote to the FBI Tuesday requesting that McCabe be released from a nondisclosure agreement that prevents him from providing those emails, among other records.
McCabe was fired from the FBI in March less than two days shy of his retirement after rocky final months of service. During the 2016 campaign, then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump latched on to a report that McCabe's wife accepted nearly $500,000 from the political action committee of then-Democratic Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton family ally, during a failed bid for state Senate in 2015. Though McCabe was not promoted to deputy director at the FBI until months after his wife lost the race, Trump continues to assert on Twitter that McCabe had a conflict of interest in later overseeing the FBI's investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server, given the donations to his wife.

Grassley has set the Judiciary hearing for next Monday, but it could be delayed, as the inspector general's report -- while a moving target -- is still not public yet. Sources familiar with the report describe it as a massive undertaking, walking through the events leading up to the 2016 election over roughly 500 pages.
Full Article | Archive
  1. Keep Trump from winning the election. [FAILED]
  2. Cripple the incoming Trump administration to weaken it. [FAILED]
  3. Build a case to impeach Trump and force a resignation. [FAILED]
  4. Holy shit just save our own fucking asses. [CURRENTLY FAILING]
You know things have really gotten dire when I'm able to link a CNN article because there's basically no spin on it at all. McCabe is now desperately trying to cover his own ass by pleading for an immunity deal while Grassley requests that Comey and Lynch come testify before Congress along with him. After reading the draft for the investigation of the Clinton email report that he received from the OIG a little over a week ago (Because he's part of the report, so he's legally allowed to read and review it before its release), McCabe's first totally-not-at-all-suspicious response is to leap over the table and try to wrangle an immunity deal.

Every single one of these people hasn't been paying a damned bit of attention to Horowitz for all of this time, and I said a long time ago that that was going to whip back around and start biting them in the ass before they knew it. Well the clock's just struck 11, and McCabe's seen just how much Horowitz knows, and how much Horowitz can prove. There's not a lot of time left in the day, now.

What's laughable is that at this late stage of the investigation, both Horowitz and Huber have built cases based on evidence that they already have that will send McCabe to prison for a good, long time. Unless McCabe has something huge to offer up in exchange for immunity, he's not getting a deal. This isn't the previous administration, and immunity deals aren't handed out like candy anymore. If he and the FBI didn't do anything wrong, then why is he begging for immunity? He waited too long; they all waited too long.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe anything is going to happen to any of these people until it happens. At this level people routinely get away with anything, seems like.

Same, this story has been unfolding for so long now I'm skeptical it will lead to a satisfying conclusion. On the other hand it's nice to know that the DNC still can't win.
 
An image representation of how it feels to follow all of this horseshit:

View attachment 466343
If you really want to go cross-eyed, try reading up on the absolute origins of "SpyGate." This thread about it over here will just about knock your head off of your shoulders with a guillotine of text, but if you can finish and process all of the information in "Spyfall" then you'll be pretty much completely informed on the history of this "spygate" fiasco and every player involved. Apologies in advance to @spiritofamermaid because I know she obsessively reads everything she sees, but I'm sure we'll see her again in a week or two when she finally gets back from that thread.
 
If he talks, he's going to end up committing suicide by shooting himself in the head 9 times.

View attachment 466312
Now, I'm not privy to most of this, but I imagine that in the event something happened to McCabe to prevent him from testifying, wouldn't it stop this whole thing from further unraveling?

Rate me :dumb: if you like, but I imagine there's some kind of measures put in place to prevent that, right?
 
Now, I'm not privy to most of this, but I imagine that in the event something happened to McCabe to prevent him from testifying, wouldn't it stop this whole thing from further unraveling?

Rate me :dumb: if you like, but I imagine there's some kind of measures put in place to prevent that, right?
McCabe's not even remotely integral to these proceedings anymore, and that alone should make him incredibly nervous, because unless he has some serious information that he's squatting on, he's no longer all that useful and he's definitely not getting an immunity deal without something like that. The ~500 page OIG report has already been completed and his OIG report was finished and released months ago. He can speed up the process now by testifying to its benefit, but even in the event that McCabe just happened to fall down an elevator shaft onto some bullets, it wouldn't make a lick of a difference at this stage. If anything it would only speed things up because McCabe's death would look extraordinarily suspicious.

Honestly, if he gets an immunity deal in this instance, I'd actually be over the moon. Unlike the previous situation where-in the entirety of Hillary's team were given immunity deals for no particular reason whatsoever, in this case--where it would be the actual, practical application and purpose of an immunity deal-- it would mean that McCabe just flipped on someone huge. If in the coming weeks we actually do see McCabe being granted one, I'm going to be bouncing off the walls because it means beyond any shadow of a doubt that he just flipped on someone way, way up the chain, and they're going to eat dirt.
 
Last edited:
Now, I'm not privy to most of this, but I imagine that in the event something happened to McCabe to prevent him from testifying, wouldn't it stop this whole thing from further unraveling?

Rate me :dumb: if you like, but I imagine there's some kind of measures put in place to prevent that, right?
I don't think it'd make a difference to Hillary or Bill at this point. They're so old, they'll probably be dead by the time the paperwork's done.

But if McCabe has an unfortunate accident, I have a feeling a lot of other people might as well. Hillary had no problem whatsoever coming up with a list of reasons why she lost. Maybe at some point she'll figure she has nothing to lose by checking a few of those names off her list.
 
I don't think it'd make a difference to Hillary or Bill at this point. They're so old, they'll probably be dead by the time the paperwork's done.

I dunno, they're 20 years younger than Carter, and he's still doing ok.

Unless it's going to take longer than that.
 
If you really want to go cross-eyed, try reading up on the absolute origins of "SpyGate." This thread about it over here will just about knock your head off of your shoulders with a guillotine of text, but if you can finish and process all of the information in "Spyfall" then you'll be pretty much completely informed on the history of this "spygate" fiasco and every player involved. Apologies in advance to @spiritofamermaid because I know she obsessively reads everything she sees, but I'm sure we'll see her again in a week or two when she finally gets back from that thread.
93878d156864c4340118ef1812fc4e13.gif

:semperfidelis: See you on the other side. :semperfidelis:

(thanks for the link btw, hopefully it'll help this whole thing make some sense)

********************

Edit: This goes all the way back to Enron!! But that's so far back... Wow. I read through it, not too deeply on the first go through since a deep read is best for the second (and even that was enough for me to go wtf). It definitely explains a lot of stuff, and imo is more incestuous than a redneck family branch. Why would they do this, though? Money doesn't seem to be enough of a motivator, at least in my mind for something like this, especially with Clinton and Obama working together, so the question is now: who's got the dirt on whom? Because that likelihood (especially with the links between the Clinton Foundation and the pedophile ring iirc, which wasn't the Pizzagate thing) of it being something truly terrible continues to come to mind.

Also, whoever leaked the emails to Wikileaks was the real punch in the gut. While I'd hope that this whole thing would be happening without the leak, it definitely brought it into the public's eye. I noticed earlier in the TDS thread that people were mentioning the leaker was Seth Rich (though it wasn't noted in the link) and considering his suicide-by-two-shots-from-behind, as well as the total panic that ensued, it's definitely been on my mind.

Thirdly, I made dis:
Screenshot 2018-06-06 17.06.11.1.png
I haven't watched It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia so I don't know if Charlie (I think that's his name?) is legitimately crazy or is actually right. Hopefully it's the latter, otherwise I'll be a bit embarrassed.
 
Last edited:
I haven't watched It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia so I don't know if Charlie (I think that's his name?) is legitimately crazy or is actually right. Hopefully it's the latter, otherwise I'll be a bit embarrassed.

Charlie huffs a lot of glue / spray paint and was an abortion that didn't take. Pepe Silva ends up being Pennsylvania. Dudes illiterate, cause quite a few issues.
 
Back