𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

Drama around the Turkey elections, with Musk apparently "following the law" and allegedly censoring opposition accounts. Absolute lulz.
The reasoning?
"If we don't censor this political content, the whole country will lose access to Twitter"
Ahhh so this is how it works. If a dictator just wants to remove his opponents from Twitter when it matters, all they have to do is threaten that they will ban the platform for a week while political event is happening. This is surely not something that can be exploited, not at all.
View attachment 5120970
[A]
Musk was always a spineless retard, this just proves it even more.
 
Eh, at least the meltdowns were entertaining. They still are, but now it's from the other side.

Look, Twitter returning to "Business as Usual" was the boring outcome, so it was the most expected outcome. This is still, if absolutely nothing else, the most expensive shitpost in history, but I'm not surprised its ending with a whimper.
 
goodman.jpg

 
I wonder how long before Twitter becomes a heavily censored platform again? I feel stupid for trusting Elon. That tranny motherWEFer will gleefully censor this life saving truth for his masters.

It's not hard to blackmail or threaten someone when you probably have their entire internet, social media, and phoneline footprint. Either blackmail, or threats. Because they know what you care about, or what you're hiding, they know everything.

It doesn't matter if you're one of them. If you decide you're not playing their game, you're out.

suicide.jpg
 
Didn't use it before Musk, didn't use it during Musk, won't use it after Musk. Some retarded WEF cunt running it into the ground will be less entertaining than Musk running it into the ground, but it's still running into the ground.

It will remain what it has been, a containment zone for literally mindless NPCs, severely mentally ill troons, blue-haired retarded twats, and others of the current thing ilk.
Right, and it will also continue to be a way to fabricate "public support" and push propaganda.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst
on the one hand, he drops turbo redpills like this.
but then on the other hand, he hands control of his platform to some WEF woman?
it makes no sense. is he schizophrenic?
He just burned a pile of money bigger than the Joker did in Dark Knight. For a shitpost. You expect what he does to make sense?
 
on the one hand, he drops turbo redpills like this.
but then on the other hand, he hands control of his platform to some WEF woman?
it makes no sense. is he schizophrenic?

Just think if you were a billionaire that owned SpaceX, StarLink, Tesla, Twitter. And instead of just dropping red pills here and there, you decided to suspend electric cars, the starlink program, and block the new CEO. You'd be getting a visit.

charles.jpg

 
Last edited:
Cross posting but Null must be happy but its 50/50 on hate of musk
1684438701289.png1684439552495.png1684439690034.png
🔥 Gonzalez v. Google LLC

“[W]e think it sufficient to acknowledge that much (if not all) of [Gonzalez family's] complaint seems to fail under either our decision in Twitter or the Ninth Circuit’s unchallenged holdings below. …
… We therefore decline to address the application of §230 to a complaint that appears to state little, if any, plausible claim for relief. …
… Instead, we vacate the judgment below and remand the case for the Ninth Circuit to consider plaintiffs’ complaint in light of our decision in Twitter.”

Read: supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
🔥 Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh

“Plaintiffs’ allegations that these social-media companies aided and abetted ISIS in its terrorist attack on the Reina nightclub fail to state a claim under 18 U. S. C. §2333(d)(2)”
“In this case, the failure to allege that the platforms here do more than transmit information by billions of people [...] is insufficient to state a claim that defendants knowingly gave substantial assistance and thereby aided and abetted ISIS’ acts.”

It was a unanimous decision written by Justice Thomas, with Justice Jackson filing a concurring opinion.

Read: supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Cross posting but Null must be happy but its 50/50 on hate of musk
I'll note that the Court is sending a signal by not only having a unanimous decision in this case, but having the main opinion written by the most conservative Justice on the Court, and with a concurrence by the most liberal, coincidentally the two black Justices on the Court.

They're basically saying no, no, NO! NO! FUCK YOU, NO!
 
Back