EU Norway’s government collapses over EU spat - An EU energy law dispute fractured the coalition beyond repair.

The Norwegian government collapsed Thursday after the Euroskeptic Centre Party left the two-party coalition after weeks of brawling over the adoption of three EU energy directives, local media reported.

Their exit leaves Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre's center-left Labour Party to govern on its own for the first time in 25 years.

Norway, while not part of the EU, has to adopt the bloc's laws as a member of the European Economic Area (EEA). The agrarian Centre Party is strongly against the EEA agreement, which gives Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein access to the EU's internal market.

Centre Party leader and Finance Minister Trygve Slagsvold Vedum said he could not accept the directives in the EU's fourth clean energy package, which aims to increase renewable energy and encourage more energy-efficient infrastructure construction.

“We say that enough is enough, this is the limit. We are doing this to change Norwegian electricity policy and create a dynamic where we can take steps that can give us lower and stable electricity prices in Norway, and that we should not give up more power to the EU,” said Vedum.

The Labour Party said it is possible to introduce parts of the package without affecting Norway's sovereignty.

Since the discovery of North Sea oil in 1969, Norway’s abundant energy resources have been the cornerstone of the country's transformation into one of Europe’s wealthiest nations.

The Norwegian government has played a central role in managing this wealth. It holds a 67 percent majority stake in Equinor, the national oil company, which generates significant profits during periods of high prices, boosting government dividends.

Article Link

Archive
 
the only reason why Norway is not a full member of the EU is because of some protests early on. later on the politicians backdoored it and made us members of the European economic area instead. Then tried to say "we're already members of the EEA lets just become members so we can vote on it!!"

Either way senterpartiet is just doing this to save themselves should it backfire and have made it clear they're willing to govern again with arbeiderpartiet after the election.
 
Is this sort of like the yearly budget battles and “government shutdowns” in the United States where like only 5% of the whole government is temporarily closed?

I had heard of another country in Europe that could not come to an agreement on some important matter and they just, like, ceased to function, but nobody really noticed because the government wasn’t that important in peoples lives.

This seems like the same case. I don’t think I’d notice it if the federal government disappeared for one day unless I had to go to the post office. Oh and I wouldn’t be taxed as much lmao
 
Man they should find a new word for this phenomenon because when a government collapses it means like a coup or something to me, but since this is like the third or fourth European incident since November it just seems like a wet fart in comparison
 
Man they should find a new word for this phenomenon because when a government collapses it means like a coup or something to me, but since this is like the third or fourth European incident since November it just seems like a wet fart in comparison
Some countries in Europe have coalition governments. Basically the coalition barely has a majority, either by the system's design or just how unpopular everybody is. Sometimes small parties leaving are enough to reduce their seats etc and render them ineffective.

I guess "losing their slight majority" is not good for clicks.
 
Centre Party leader and Finance Minister Trygve Slagsvold Vedum said he could not accept the directives in the EU's fourth clean energy package, which aims to increase renewable energy and encourage more energy-efficient infrastructure construction.
Whenever a journalist writes only about the positives of something a group refuses to accept without mentioning the problems that have resulted in its rejection you know
a) it's fairly bad
b) the journalist is not providing unbiased reporting

Hell might not have had somewhere for propagandists in its original design but it surely has these days.
 
Back