Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

Goose the Redeemer said:
View attachment 8628250
Click to expand...
dhdhehshsheb.jpg
sgevehdhdbd.jpg
I hope this guy from 2004 has learned to read since then
 
I always spelled out 'SQL'. I did this because in the 90s calling it 'sequel' was mostly pushed hard by MS SQL Server admins trying to sound cool.
 
seri0us said:
View attachment 8628103
Click to expand...
This screensaver?

I don't remember the supposed shape being described in text in the upper right hand corner of the screen as he claims. Though in all fairness, that's an 11 year old video. I would not be surprised of some troon more recently pushed a patch to include these supposed penises and vaginas and include text so you would know you were looking at some pornsick weirdo's interpretation of those shapes.
 
Mikoyan said:
I always spelled out 'SQL'. I did this because in the 90s calling it 'sequel' was mostly pushed hard by MS SQL Server admins trying to sound cool.
Click to expand...
I'm gonna sound like a dickhead but whenever i'm in a bad mood and someone brings dumb shit like this to me I pretend to not understand.

Sequel? Sequel to what?? Oh, you meant ESS QUE ELL. Yeah, what about it, get to the point, I'm busy.

MongoDB is sorta the same because if you're not calling it mongoloid db, then i am.
 
CEO of Gay said:
I don't remember the supposed shape being described in text in the upper right hand corner of the screen as he claims. Though in all fairness, that's an 11 year old video. I would not be surprised of some troon more recently pushed a patch to include these supposed penises and vaginas and include text so you would know you were looking at some pornsick weirdo's interpretation of those shapes.
Click to expand...
The post was made in 2004
 
CEO of Gay said:
I don't remember the supposed shape being described in text in the upper right hand corner of the screen as he claims.
Click to expand...
It's a toggle in the screensaver settings.

The shapes (and their names) do exist in the code:
C: 
    { "erect penis",     /* thanks benno */
      { PIN, ZERO, PIN, PIN, ZERO, ZERO, PIN, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, PIN,
    PIN, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, RIGHT, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO,
    ZERO, ZERO }
    },
    { "flaccid penis",
      { PIN, ZERO, PIN, PIN, ZERO, ZERO, PIN, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, PIN,
    PIN, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, RIGHT, PIN, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO,
    ZERO, ZERO }
    },
    { "vagina",
      { RIGHT, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, RIGHT, ZERO, ZERO, PIN, ZERO, ZERO,
    LEFT, ZERO, ZERO, ZERO, LEFT, ZERO, LEFT, PIN, LEFT, PIN, RIGHT,
    PIN, RIGHT, ZERO }
    },

// ...

    { "Penis",
        { PIN, PIN, RIGHT, ZERO, PIN, PIN, ZERO, PIN, ZERO, ZERO, RIGHT, PIN, LEFT, ZERO, ZERO, PIN, ZERO, PIN, PIN, ZERO, LEFT, PIN, PIN, ZERO }
    },

Anyway, why are we talking about a forum post from 2004?
 
mentally retarded user said:
Emperor Trump just popped the AI bubble over Anthropic's faggot Code of Conduct.
Click to expand...
At least provide a link
President Donald Trump has ordered all federal agencies to immediately cease using Anthropic’s AI technology, citing the company’s ethical restrictions as a threat to national security. In a Truth Social post, Trump labeled Anthropic a “RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY” and accused its leadership of attempting to “strong-arm” the Department of War. He declared that the U.S. government would no longer do business with Anthropic, though he allowed a six-month phase-out period for the Pentagon and other agencies to transition away from its products.

The dispute centers on Anthropic’s code of conduct, which prohibits the use of its AI model, Claude, in mass surveillance of American citizens and fully autonomous weapons—two uses the Pentagon insists must be permitted for “all lawful purposes.” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth followed up by designating Anthropic a supply-chain risk to national security, effectively banning all military contractors and partners from doing business with the company. This move, typically reserved for foreign adversaries, reflects the administration’s view that Anthropic’s ethical guardrails are incompatible with U.S. military operations.

Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, has stated the company cannot “in good conscience” allow its technology to be used in ways that violate democratic values or exceed the current reliability of AI systems. The conflict underscores a broader tension between private AI ethics and government operational demands, with OpenAI and other major tech firms also facing similar scrutiny.
Click to expand...
 
prollyanotherlurker said:
Anyway. They'll just replace it with another ai tool for mass surveillance
Click to expand...
This proved out especially quickly: https://x.com/sama/status/2027578652477821175 (A)

Sam Altman said:
Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network.

In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome.

AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement.

We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only.

We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements.

We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.
Click to expand...

Tsoliassssssssssssss said:
I am sure if I think for another 5 minutes I will remember a few more brain-rotting abbreviations.
Click to expand...

Due to an misreading long ago I still think of bcachefs as BCA Chefs
Swedish_poser.webp
 
Last edited:
The Real Slim Shady said:
GCC and other GNU utilities runs the entire world's software. Enjoy paying Keil or Microsoft for your C compiler.
Click to expand...
An intelligent programmer would use a good compiler, like TCC. GCC is written in CPP and therefore it sucks. GNU coreutils suck. The GNU project is pure niggertrash, they were only able to produce a few small gems, like GPG.
@Cherenkovblue is an Aryan king.
 
Last edited:
Steel Billet said:
An intelligent programmer would use a good compiler, like TCC. GCC is written in CPP and therefore it sucks.
Click to expand...
GCC supports a lot more than C, and decided to go down the route of being a 'universal' compiler. Unfortunately, that means that it is universally trash. I had to learn that the hard way.
Steel Billet said:
GNU coreutils suck. The GNU project is pure
Click to expand...
This I can agree with. Fuck GNU.
 
prollyanotherlurker said:
Seems like it's a bit of quite a few things. Probably using the language needed for each compiler frontend in that given language.
Click to expand...
What "written in C++" means, practically, in the context of GCC, is that version 4.7 is the last version of GCC that can compile without a C++ compiler, which is just before when it stopped being "written in C". When bootstrapping a system from scratch, as is the case in some arcane Guix code paths, this matters. GCC 4.7 can be compiled using TCC, and so GCC 4.7 becomes the hinge point for bringing that system into the modern era. https://bootstrappable.org/projects/mes.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom