i wonder what they specifically are pointing out as "promote porn" ... im not super familiar with the bible but isnt the stuff about adultery just saying to uphold chaste until marriage and to not lust for women besides your bride?
The Bible, and especially the Old Testament around the book of Genesis to Leviticus, has a lot of wild and insane sexual stories, like the daughters of Lot getting him drunk to have sex with him to conceive children, and male polyamory — a man having multiple wives within the institution of marriage — was common if not encouraged. As well as this, there's quite a few accounts of pagan slaughter — me and all my homies fucking hate the Amalekites, Amorites, Philistines, and Egyptians — genocide, and stonings.
The promoting porn argument is a complete non-sequitur, but there is an argument to be made,
IF one ignores the wider context of the book and reads the passages in isolation, that it promotes violence, contains graphic descriptions of death, has sexual content including rape, and themes inappropriate for children.
Overall, this is most likely trannies being trannies, but there is something to be said for the argument that from a secular and objective viewpoint, there are some passages in the Bible that are inappropriate for young children, at least for them to read on their own without someone to explain the context and wider meanings.
"
