Paul Krugman Tweets His IP Is Compromised; Used for Downloading CP


New York Times columnist Paul Krugman claimed on Twitter Wednesday that a hacker is attempting to use his IP address to “download child pornography.”

“Well, I’m on the phone with my computer security service, and as I understand it someone compromised my IP address and is using it to download child pornography,” wrote the Nobel Prize winning economist.

An Internet Protocol (IP) number is a virtual address connected to any given computer hardware that assists with connecting said devices to a broader network like the internet; it also allows devices to be addressed to a specific location of the user.

“I might just be a random target. But this could be an attempt to Qanon me,” he added, referencing the far-right online conspiracy QAnon which brazenly alleges that President Donald Trump is secretly working to unmask and take down a global network of elite pedophiles, who are in-turn working with the so-called “deep state” to take down his administration. “It’s an ugly world out there.”

- End of Article -​


Today, Paul Krugman, author and New York Times contributor, tweeted the following: "Well, I’m on the phone with my computer security service, and as I understand it someone compromised my IP address and is using it to download child pornography. I might just be a random target. But this could be an attempt to Qanon me. It’s an ugly world out there."

He then proceeded to respond to his own tweet with "The Times is now on the case."

I'm not sure what is more retarded, that he thinks people will buy this bullshit, or that he somehow turned the word "Qanon" into a verb. Either way, fear not citizen, the New York Times will be extensively reviewing all child porn photos involved in this incident and reporting back to you.

1578521944326.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why is The Times having any involvement with this? Shouldn't the FBI be seizing his computer and going through his accounts right now?
Moreso than any other publication except MAYBE the New Yorker, I find that in-house NYT columnists like Krugman (who haven't had any kind of threat to their job security for the last 30 years) treat the Times like a parental figure and will never shut up about their involvement with it.
 
Why the fuck would you announce something like that on twitter?! I'm not a networking expert, but my understanding is that you can spoof somebody's IP address, but I have no idea what the fuck "compromising an IP address" is even supposed to mean. If he was caught with actual CP on one of his devices I'm going to assume he is 100% lying.
 
Is that even a defense that could hold up in court? Like some sort of "reasonable doubt clause"? Hope shit sticks in any case people like this need to get their nuts clipped.
He's probably hoping he can use the same defense that several people have successfully used against the RIAA and MPAA - more often the porn industry and their hounds - where an IP alone is not sufficient evidence to suggest the defendant did the deed.
 
Moreso than any other publication except MAYBE the New Yorker, I find that in-house NYT columnists like Krugman (who haven't had any kind of threat to their job security for the last 30 years) treat the Times like a parental figure and will never shut up about their involvement with it.
Unless I misread it, I inferred that he was meaning that The Times were doing an investigation into this "crime". I don't know why he would make that claim as I don't know why The Times would even humor investigating a supposed IP spoofing involving CP. I get what you're saying about the weird reverence he'd have for the paper but to include them in this weird, flex I guess, is just bizarre.
 
Back