mnt_ms
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2026
Which is funny because at its core it's quite easy. No super complicated concepts, very simple tools. It just takes more time.When you're decent at assembly, it comes off as wizardry to most mere mortals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which is funny because at its core it's quite easy. No super complicated concepts, very simple tools. It just takes more time.When you're decent at assembly, it comes off as wizardry to most mere mortals.
Forced to use c99, at the most, sadly. (and such compiler intrinsics aren't permitted in the context I am going for). But good to know anyways.There’s a relatively recently added compiler intrinsic in GCC you might find interesting, but I wouldn’t trust nested functions much because of trampolining
you can make a new account on gitgud.io and post it thereLearning C and ASM before object oriented languages makes me have perma data brain and it makes me want to do things like have everything use something like ECS under the hood.
What's hilarious is a codegen and a better AI can literally just do that. I had claude do that with Opus. C# and Java.
Java: used the motherfucking Guava test suite and... it works. But I'll never get a CTO to fucking try it and fuck being a maintenance dev for this.
C#: didn't need it nearly as much because C# already does shit like Array of Struct etc. Also it has Span<T> etc.
It's still hilarious to me that we throw object references around and pointer chase when we've known cache locality is the most fucking important thing, ever, and MUH INDICES are easily fixed with Handles (with generations). Sigh.
You can even do fucking trees etc with them. Just make another fucking component that has indices for parent/child.
I'm on the fence about open soresing this shit but loldoxing myself for a programming spat on KF.
I don't pronounce it as I don't have anyone to talk to.do you guys pronounce i2c as i-two-c or i-squared-c?
i personally say i2c because faster
bro doesnt have internal monologue SADI don't pronounce it as I don't have anyone to talk to.
Newer standard GCC C is a lot of fun, but the portability stuff does hold it back.Forced to use c99, at the most, sadly. (and such compiler intrinsics aren't permitted in the context I am going for). But good to know anyways.
I was working through Jens Gustedt's Modern C a while ago. Didn't finish it because of life events, but I enjoyed it, and C in general.Newer standard GCC C is a lot of fun, but the portability stuff does hold it back.
I've been using C2Y lately, and I quite like it. The nice thing about C as opposed to C++ is that you can avoid newer features you don't like.