Since I lurked the CWC subforum the most when I first began lurking the Kiwi Farms (back when they were the CWCki Forums), I tend to apply a lot of board etiquette from that into the other subforums.
One rule that's not necessarily written out but said by the mods is this: We put in the ratings function for a reason. We don't need people parroting the same detail about Enter being an idiot or being ill-informed or being a pansy. If you agree with a post, put the Agree tag on it. You don't need to quote the post saying that you like it. If all you do is parrot posts or just call Enter an idiot without any real insightful commentary or discussion beyond it, you're gonna be, at the very least, tedious and annoying. It isn't as big an issue there, but when our beloved OPL began his Pepper Spraying incident, entire topics would be derailed about how he's insane and how he's going to jail and a bunch of people hypothesizing how he'll react to a guy shivving him, basically giving the mods a headache.
Basically, if you're gonna post, say something interesting. We don't need you to tell us Enter's an idiot (repeatedly, over the course of several posts that say almost the exact samet hing). You might as well tell me that the grass is fucking green while you're at it. And if you dislike Enter, don't seem obsessive about it. Don't go all A-Log and start saying he's worse than Hitler or some shit like that. He's a hypocritical sperg that overanalyzes technicolor ponies. This is like saying that a guy that shoved you in the mall is as bad as the Nazis.
)