Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

[JU 199]

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Pissed_at_us#Kiwi_Farms

No, you fucking morons, we find you a bunch of jokes, not worthy of even mild annoyance. Also, the quote you cited was sarcasm.

I look forward to the Irrationals writing a Kiwi Farms article. If they want some tips, sprinkle on some SJW butthurt and some "we're totes not mad at being laughed at" crap, we could use the lulz.

If you're so rational, why bother caring about opinions from people you see as beneath you?

Checkmate assholes.

 

[Karellen]

I used to read RW back when Conservapedia was still a thing. I love how they mocked User: Conservative for editing 30+hrs at a time and how awful Assfly was as a site admin for not helping him out, yet Ryulong does the exact same thing and he's a hero for the SJW movement.

 

[Cynical]

Aw, they quoted me:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...at_us&curid=123922&diff=1575623&oldid=1575619

 

[TheImportantFart]

Aw, they quoted me:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...at_us&curid=123922&diff=1575623&oldid=1575619

Typical RationalWiki response. Raise legit points of criticism and don't even bother to offer a rebuttal beyond some buzzword or canned pop culture phraseology.

 

[Positron]

Aw, they quoted me:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...at_us&curid=123922&diff=1575623&oldid=1575619

It's cute they select a rather atypical response, in an attempt to paint us a a religious site. *tips fedora*

 

[*Asterisk*]

I can't believe we've made it this long without discussing their GamerGate series:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/GamerGate

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_Gamergate_claims

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anita_Sarkeesian

One bit I love is that they say Anita Sarkeesian is totally different from Jack Thompson because she doesn't advocate hard censorship. Completely ignoring that those were the exact arguments Thompson himself made when he tried to label things like GTA and 2 Live Crew pornography.

Labeling anything pornographic, even when you don't want it outlawed, still has pretty serious consequences, and not just to things like Aidra Fox movies.

For example: Blue is the Warmest Color was a "real movie." It won and was nominated for serious awards, it had a theatrical run, and was discussed in polite company by people who used their real names. But even with hot lesbian action from sexy femme actresses and "worked" rather than "shoot" sex, that NC-17 rating put a very low cap on how much money it could make.

If the Sarkeesian and Thompsons of the world succeed merely implementing soft censorship, for all intents and purposes, it'll be logistically impossible to make a GTA or a Red Dead or a DOA or nearly any other M Rated game released in the last 20 years. No one should tolerate this shit.

 

[Accel_Rider]

If you're so rational, why bother caring about opinions from people you see as beneath you?

Checkmate assholes.

Rational people don't keep people like Ryulong either

 

[ChameleonBody]

Then again, they think anything and everything wrong on the Internet is epic lulz!

omg


new random.txt?

 

[Hat]

 

[Jace E. Denton]

In regards to the idea of debunking conspiracy theories, it isn't difficult if you strictly adhere to the easy-mode concept of "give me absolute proof right the fuck now or else you are wrong". It still does not often disprove a theory, it simply contests a theory.

My main point here is that it the easy route in a argument is to demand outright proof. Granted, you can fault the opposition for not stepping up with an A-game in the first place, but if you strictly adhere to the denial syndrome about any conspiracy theory, you really shelter yourself. I am not trying to be a smartass, but I am sure a lot of loyalists in the late 1700s thought all the American Colonists were conspiracy theorists and a lot of German loyalists in the 1930s thought people with anti-Hitler sentiments were simply whackjobs. Sometimes a gut instinct that something is wrong is very much true. When you adhere yourself to requiring proof laid on the table, you really do open the door to people with nefarious intent outright deceiving you.

Trust me, I worked in sales for a decent amount of time, when your goal is deception, a 'logical skeptic' is usually your best friend. People who wait until proof is in their face are people who are too late to do anything about it

 

[TheImportantFart]

Their brazen dishonesty on the recently-created Sargon of Akkad page got them called out on the talk page. Also, our old friend Ryulong showed up to offer his wisdom.

Spoiler: Finally, a bit of sanity

 

[chimpburgers]

Their brazen dishonesty on the recently-created Sargon of Akkad page got them called out on the talk page. Also, our old friend Ryulong showed up to offer his wisdom.

Spoiler: Finally, a bit of sanity

View attachment 60045

They probably think he's so far right racist because he uses the word "neo-progressive" which he got from the Heritage Foundation and using anything from a right wing think tank makes you right wing. Lulz. They've been listening too much to potato YouTubers.

 

[Alberto Balsalm]

Then again, they think anything and everything wrong on the Internet is epic lulz!

This, coming from a group of people who obsessively document everything they think is wrong on the Internet, on a page where they try to mock us over literally nothing except thinking their community is shit.

 

[Adamska]

Honestly, the fact they only give a shit now is an indicator of how much of an echochamber that shithole is and how isolated and ignorant they are of the outside world. After all, we've had threads shitting on their pet causes for a year or more now and they only just noticed us when we finally decided to take the plunge with this thread due to a premier tard they keep refusing to let go.

 

[chimpburgers]

Honestly, the fact they only give a shit now is an indicator of how much of an echochamber that shithole is and how isolated and ignorant they are of the outside world. After all, we've had threads shitting on their pet causes for a year or more now and they only just noticed us when we finally decided to take the plunge with this thread due to a premier tard they keep refusing to let go.

I would have thought that the Ryulong thread would have caught their interest more or he would have bitched about this site to them first. Yes, they are that retarded.

Still doubling down guys.

Hahahahahaha!

 

[JU 199]

That doesn't look very rational or fact checked.

 

[José Mourinho]

That doesn't look very rational or fact checked.

Nah, we're the lazy ones after all. Have this article as an argument to us. The irony is fucking hilarious.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Essay:I_thought_this_was_supposed_to_be_RATIONALWiki

 

[Sanae Kochiya]

Still doubling down guys.

Hahahahahaha!

So, they quote @Satan's joke post and @Cynical's post pointing out that we're just a site dedicated to just laughing at idiots and not a place to form a lynch mob.

I can see why their own satire and self-awareness is so terrible, since it's clearly obvious they have no idea what they are.

 

[Dork Of Ages]

Christ you guys can't go one day without pissing off a bunch of spergs, it's hard to keep a track of the salt!

For what it's worth, I think their articles on American politics are interesting to me as a non-American, but I won't be suprised if those half-decent articles end up with more autistic opinions shoehorned as facts and SJW sperging.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

[screencap]

Aww, they like us!