Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

But Saddam Hussein said "mein Kampf" was his favorite book and Michel Aflaq (founder of the Baath Party) was a great fan of fascism... So we have basically come full circle...
Baathism contains both elements of fascism and socialism. I didn't saw her praising Saddam, probably because he went to bed with both the Soviets and the West.
 
Baathism contains both elements of fascism and socialism. I didn't saw her praising Saddam, probably because he went to bed with both the Soviets and the West.
Fascism contains elements of (crudely misunderstood) socialism as well. Where socialism is international, fascism (and Baathism) are hyper-nationalistic and exclude certain groups (Jews, foreigners) a priori . Islamism and Djihaddism on the other hand want to replace the nation state with the Umma which is even more retarded. And well, Mona probably did not praise Saddam (if she did I am unaware of it), but I am quite sure she said removing him from power was a mistake...
 
Fascism contains elements of (crudely misunderstood) socialism as well. Where socialism is international, fascism (and Baathism) are hyper-nationalistic and exclude certain groups (Jews, foreigners) a priori . Islamism and Djihaddism on the other hand want to replace the nation state with the Umma which is even more retarded. And well, Mona probably did not praise Saddam (if she did I am unaware of it), but I am quite sure she said removing him from power was a mistake...
I'm not so sure, whether her attitude about Saddam differs much from the general attitude towards him on RW (he was a monster and they're not sorry that he's dead, but they object to the way how he was removed from power and the mismanagement through the Coalition afterwards).
 
Somebody shows up to make (extremely minor and nonconsequential) corrections to claims about them personally. The response? (read down to up)

7afp4kG.png


Just revert it with no explanation over and over. When he doesn't get the hint and fuck off, protect the page. The talk page is already protected so there's no chance he can actually discuss the claims, don't worry. Oh, and for good measure let's just directly tell him his kind isn't wanted.

5EW5ATt.png


But don't forget...

HBh2ebV.png
They're about as open to criticism and dialogue (or debate) as those manhood101 tards were.
 
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ration...eone_with_Asperger.27s_get_over_depression.3F

How does someone with Asperger's get over depression?
So, this is related, if anyone here remembers (probably don't but that's ok it was quite a while ago) to me and my trouble getting over a girl. I really am getting pretty mad at myself that I still think about her sometimes, even after 3 years. :/ QuantumDudeI am beyond your understanding 19:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

What you need is a mental health professional, not the advice of a bunch of strangers on the internet. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 19:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

I did and it really didn't help. QuantumDudeI am beyond your understanding 19:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 
That's quite literally the most autistic thing yet on RW

It gets better/worse with the past discussion he mentioned.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:QuantumDude

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...64029#Question_about_love:_Am_I_irrational.3F

Question about love: Am I irrational?
So, I have been in love with a girl who rejected me who was a good friend and hasn't spoken to me in almost 3 years. Yet I still feel that I love her. I don't think about her constantly, or even very often any more, but it still elicits very strong feelings when I do. Am I just some irrational freak who can't get over stuff or... ? QuantumDudeI am beyond your understanding 04:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks guys. I appreciate the responses. I had a great amount of difficulty getting over her to the extent that I have. I suppose ever since then I've just thought that "something must be wrong with me". Doesn't help that I've never even been on a date before lol. QuantumDudeI am beyond your understanding 15:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

3 years with no contact, getting in touch at this stage, no matter how innocently, is going to look obsessive. useful advice beyond the obvious generalities is difficult as your perspective, her perspective, our (limited) perspective are going to differ. There really is no useful advice beyond the 'try not to obsess', but you know, try not to obsess. Try to come to terms with any kind of relationship you had is in the past. It will still be painful but you'll be moving on. I'm sure you know or have been told this before, buts all that can be done. AMassiveGay (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Hopefully so. I'm not really good with social skills in general, as I have ADHD, Anxiety, and Asperger's... a devastating mix when trying to talk to girls you don't already know. QuantumDudeI am beyond your understanding 19:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

No, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be able to contact her without looking obsessive. To be honest, I don't think I'm ever going to find anyone who I like who also likes me. No one's ever liked me. I'm probably starting to come off as a pathetic loser to you guys right now. Sorry :( didn't really mean to make this into a pity party. Just really difficult.QuantumDudeI am beyond your understanding 04:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 
Yeah that surprised me too some years ago.

Queex trying to dismiss Maddox as just some "YouTuber" is pretty hilarious though. If he were pro-Anita they'd be sucking him off.

Obviously Maddox is pretty important to internet culture but like... him actually doing things in 2016 is like hearing the President of the Babylonia just denounced Assyria's unjust war on the Achaean League or something. Holy shit why is Maddox still existing nobody cares anymore.
 
Spud lets everyone know he wasn't one of the seven deaths from Taiwan earthquake because they surely were thinking of him: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ration....2C_Spud.2C_survived_the_earthquake_in_Taiwan

That sperg's thread got collapsed after Men's Rights EXTREMIST went off on him: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ration...eone_with_Asperger.27s_get_over_depression.3F

So basically, you either ARE a stalker, or she's a bitch who doesn't mind falsely accusing you or a crazy chick who can't tell the difference between stalking and what you were doing. And you're going to pine over her?

If you weren't in a romantic relationship with her, you may not even know what she would've been like in that capacity. You may have dodged a bullet, for all you know.

Anyway, if you have your shit together (steady job at someplace other than Burger King, etc.) and you have a decent personality, you can find a "cute, kind, smart" chick who will want you, and then you'll be able to more easily forget about the chick who got away. Maybe the new chick won't love art, science, physics, and robotics, but she'll be able to do stuff for you that'll make you forget about those deficiencies. Anyway, you can find people on the Internet to talk to about those interests. You don't need all those characteristics in one person; you can have a mix of bros AND hos who together fulfill your intellectual, emotional, and sexual needs. I'm trying to think if I know of any nerdy chicks who aren't too fucked up in the head to be able to sustain a healthy relationship, and I'm coming up empty.

My (unsolicited) advice? Go Asian, bro. You sound kinda nerdy, and Asian chicks are usually the best match for nerdy guys. Besides, they tend to age better than white chicks. Look at those girls on The Big Bang Theory; they're already not as hot as they were a few years ago. White chicks' shelf life is VERY short. Men's Rights EXTREMIST (talk) 12:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 
How did Gerard come to be in charge? I don't remember him being involved in the founding.

He turned up back in 2008, which was a few years in to the life of the wiki. He came in with the message of "yes, I'm THAT David Gerard", and was greeted as "wow, it's THAT David Gerard!". He's been very active in RW, and has a lot of wiki experience, so it's not surprising he'd climb. While Gerard isn't the sole reason for RW's decline - that's been inevitable almost since its inception - he's certainly a leader they deserve. His obsessing over SJW stuff, and being sneaky in his methods, hasn't helped. His war on Carpetsmoker certainly resembles those curious earlier incidents where "technical issues" caused a number of irritants to lose access to their accounts. His strangely protective attitude towards Ryulong certainly damaged RW, but it is in keeping with RW tradition. One of the problems was that, with the wish to not be like Conservapedia, that it was very difficult to deal with trolls and lunatics. And he wasn't alone in that, with Gooniepunk strangely unblocking Ryulong, his rational being that Ryulong wasn't coming back. Obviously their methods have evolved a but, as we see with Gerard banning for spurious reasons, as with Carpetsmoker. Their use of the super secret mod account was another sign, as was the memory holing that's been happening.

It seems they want to maintain the freedom of speech and liberal veneer, when in reality they are increasingly comfortable with adopting Conservapedia's playbook. Gerard isn't their leader. He wields a lot of power because he's THAT David Gerard and also because he he can do the tech stuff for the site. He's one of two people with root level access to the server, which is also why he's a prime candidate for the unfortunate technical issues that conveniently disabled a couple of accounts.
 
Back