Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Dude at this point is there anyone on rationalwiki who hasn't been banned for cluelessly shitting up ED?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellfire
Cynical said:
Called it, ED laughs in @FuzzyCuck's face:

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Talk:Nigel_Farage
Click to expand...

Look at any political article on ED and it viciously mocks the target, wherever they are on the political spectrum. An article usually starts out reflecting the view of whoever started the article, who often actually is of whatever political view hates that person the most. As it evolves, others throw in their input and it usually ends up just trashing everything in sight including the politician's opponents and the views of the person who started the article.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: seagull, AN/ALR56, Randall Fragg and 3 others
chimpburgers said:
@FuzzyCuck has a major case of the tism. He doesn't have to worry about being banned here however and he's too insignificant enough for his own thread, so he should be grateful that he at least has that going for him here.
Click to expand...

Everyone who edits wikis has a major case of the tism but FuzzyCuck is alright mainly because he stands next to Rational Wiki speds and gets compared favourably to them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Kebab and Calculator, Randall Fragg, Army Burger and 1 other person
Dynastia said:
Everyone who edits wikis has a major case of the tism but FuzzyCuck is alright mainly because he stands next to Rational Wiki speds and gets compared favourably to them.
Click to expand...

i'll have you know, i detox my tism on the regular

AnOminous said:
Look at any political article on ED and it viciously mocks the target, wherever they are on the political spectrum. An article usually starts out reflecting the view of whoever started the article, who often actually is of whatever political view hates that person the most. As it evolves, others throw in their input and it usually ends up just trashing everything in sight including the politician's opponents and the views of the person who started the article.
Click to expand...

ehh I'll buy that

what pissed me off was the lack of humor

eg:

History has proven time and time again that Britain can survive on its own, while other countries fester and get taken over by muslimes. Before joining the EU, British people had many events to be proud of, including being on the winning side of WW2 and showing those pesky krauts who's boss. They colonised Australia, Africa and many other countries and after changing them to not being complete shitholes, climbed the highest mountains, generated much wealth, and possessed history's largest empire.

None of these things could possibly be accomplished with all European peoples collectively squabbling for attention and recognition. The British people were being told time and time again that things like sovereignty and national pride shouldn't matter in 2016 and should instead care about irrelevant subjects like refugees and trannies.

When Britain decided that enough is enough, the non-EU world rejoiced as a once proud and successful country broke the shackles of the EU and began its path of not allowing itself to turn to shit, like Turkey, Romania and Poland. Many other countries such as the Netherlands, France and Italy have also spoken out, saying that the referendum has been a historic day for freedom and democracy, and are slowly getting out of the mindset that they are just a small fish in the big, polluted sea that is the EU.
Click to expand...

muslimes&trannies is 8/8 b8, but where's the lulz? it reads like a vry srs post on /pol/ or non-shitpost on /r/the_donald -- ie, just politics

compare a vry srs post from breitbart: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/23/brexit-signals-end-new-world-order/

We Americans have July 4th, and the Brits now have June 23rd.
In the words of Nigel Farage, leader of the the UKIP and top proponent for the United Kingdom to leave the European, the Brexit vote was Britain’s “Independence Day.”

June 23rd will be the day that the British people filed their papers to divorce a global bureaucracy that buried national sovereignty in bureaucratic red tape. After constant failures that left many Brits without jobs and living in a nation being colonized by migrants with no attachment to British culture, enough was enough.

After almost three decades of rule, globalism was witnessing a Judgment Day and Brexit represents a nationalistic movement that has laid in wait for two decades; a movement that is jumping the pond to the United States and finding a home with Donald Trump’s “America First” campaign.

But how did globalism get here? How was the vision of the international bourgeois was rebuked and rejected in such a short order?

Much to the chagrin of the “Remain” crowd, the answer is not rooted in boorish patriotism. Rather, it is rooted in an understanding that global governing at the expense of national sovereignty never works. People will not die for bureaucracies, but they will die, sacrifice and share for their country.
Click to expand...

almost the same language

and neither makes me kek

;( <-- single tear
 
  • Optimistic
  • Informative
Reactions: AN/ALR56, Emperor Julian, chimpburgers and 2 others
FuzzyCuck said:
almost the same language

and neither makes me kek

;( <-- single tear
Click to expand...

ED are baiters, not satirists. If that was intended as satire it would fail, since a dry delivery needs an absolutely ludicrous premise, and their premise (I think Britain is better off leaving the EU) isn't remotely ludicrous or outlandish like, say, 'I think we should eat Irish babies'.

But they're not satirising. They're just baiting. They saw the unbelievable tantrums and overreactions brexit got and they're hoping left-wing idiots get super mad and entertain them with their tears. Breitbart is also baiting. They saw the unbelievable tantrums and overreactions brexit got and they're hoping idiots will get outraged and share their shitty article with likeminded friends to hateread, generating their sweet sweet shekels.

And yes, whoever wrote that could very well be a staunch brexit right-wing whatevers. They very likely are. Baiting idiots for a reaction is increasingly becoming politically partisan. Neckbeards be all "hurrrr i made a dangerhair mad!!!" and dangerhairs be all "hurrrrrr i made a neckbeard mad!!!" like every day. If somebody writes a 200 word article on how brexit is great, they're probably a right-wing poltard snickering at dangerhairs. They might not be, but they very probably are. Just like if somebody writes a 200 word essay on how the new ghostbusters movie will be better than the gross shitlord old one, they're probably a dangerhair snickering at neckbeards. Again, they might not be, but they very probably are.

In the end though, they're just trying to get idiots to react to their inflammatory article and say "wow look at the alt-white reactionary trash this is shit" so they can say you're chimping out at them and laugh about it. Oh, and you shared the breitbart link too and it probably got some clicks. Way to get baited by right-wingers twice in one sitting, champ.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: seagull, Francis York Morgan, Hellsperger and 10 others
Dynastia said:
ED are baiters, not satirists. If that was intended as satire it would fail, since a dry delivery needs an absolutely ludicrous premise, and their premise (I think Britain is better off leaving the EU) isn't remotely ludicrous or outlandish like, say, 'I think we should eat Irish babies'.

But they're not satirising. They're just baiting. They saw the unbelievable tantrums and overreactions brexit got and they're hoping left-wing idiots get super mad and entertain them with their tears. Breitbart is also baiting. They saw the unbelievable tantrums and overreactions brexit got and they're hoping idiots will get outraged and share their shitty article with likeminded friends to hateread, generating their sweet sweet shekels.

And yes, whoever wrote that could very well be a staunch brexit right-wing whatevers. They very likely are. Baiting idiots for a reaction is increasingly becoming politically partisan. Neckbeards be all "hurrrr i made a dangerhair mad!!!" and dangerhairs be all "hurrrrrr i made a neckbeard mad!!!" like every day. If somebody writes a 200 word article on how brexit is great, they're probably a right-wing poltard snickering at dangerhairs. They might not be, but they very probably are. Just like if somebody writes a 200 word essay on how the new ghostbusters movie will be better than the gross shitlord old one, they're probably a dangerhair snickering at neckbeards. Again, they might not be, but they very probably are.

In the end though, they're just trying to get idiots to react to their inflammatory article and say "wow look at the alt-white reactionary trash this is shit" so they can say you're chimping out at them and laugh about it. Oh, and you shared the breitbart link too and it probably got some clicks. Way to get baited by right-wingers twice in one sitting, champ.
Click to expand...

but

but I could never get baited

I'm a rationals
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: seagull, Hellsperger, WhoopieDoo and 7 others
Dynastia said:
Now that you've doxed your first ip here we need to change your name to FuzzyChamp
Click to expand...
Doxxxxxxxxing is fun.

But of course we at Ratwiki never do it! It's a despicable crime to doxxxx!

Unless of course it goes against Conservapedia, or evul Zionists...

Or people who defend https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and_the_apartheid_analogy#Criticism_of_the_apartheid_analogy Israeli Apartheid http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Apartheid#Israel_and_the_occupied_Palestinian_territories
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Randall Fragg, Hellsperger, AN/ALR56 and 2 others
upload_2016-7-9_18-16-50.png

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiInActi...what_exactly_is_rationalwiki_and_why_are_the/
upload_2016-7-9_18-17-22.png


upload_2016-7-9_18-18-3.png


upload_2016-7-9_18-19-58.png

upload_2016-7-9_18-20-23.png


upload_2016-7-9_18-21-15.png


upload_2016-7-9_18-21-28.png

RationalWiki sperg meets the Triggermobile. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Saloon_bar#This_guy_can.27t_be_serious.21

upload_2016-7-9_18-38-3.png


upload_2016-7-9_18-41-6.png
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: Hellsperger, Moexlibu and Ghostapplesause
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back