- Joined
- May 18, 2019
cant we hijack the thread to have a flame war about a flame war the sites administration had about a flame war?
RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.
- Thread starter chimpburgers
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Tobias_Reaper
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
Bizarre lies. Nowhere have I ever described myself as a "virtuous pedophile". I have no idea what you're talking about. On the subject of RationalWiki and pedophilia, I was the person who got a pedophile named Shouniaisha banned (Huess was me as pointed out on Encylopedia Dramatica.
RationalWiki - Encyclopedia Dramatica
RationalWiki:Saloon bar - RationalWiki
"
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:Shouniaisha 'I'm m a (self-diagnosed) pedophile and a hebephile" says his userpage
- Ban this sicko.Matthias Huess (talk) 02:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
You appear to have no knowledge of my edits there at all.
- Joined
- May 18, 2019
not everyone has spent years obsessed with ur edits to obscure websites so forgive me if i only focus on what u did and said this month on discord and rationalwiki
inb4 u say it wasnt u who said all those things on discord and that ur account was hacked by mikemikev ... again
Tobias_Reaper
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
This was the link I posted on RationalWiki (mods can still view the deleted edit):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Emblyn_Kerensa
How is that doxing and harassment?
Also note I have sleeper accounts that aren't blocked and some of those are a sysop. I noticed Arthur Kerensa is now running around trying to detect my accounts and block them all. haha. He won't find all of them.
I don't though plan on posting on RationalWiki ever again. The community is a cesspit and most the criticisms about RW in this thread are true - the mods and sysops who are editing are all mentally ill SJWs.
- Joined
- May 18, 2019
maybe the doxing has something to do with how her name wasnt linked to her rationalwiki account and the harassment has something to do with how u went onto her talk page and discord to post threats and weird shit about the things u would do unless she redacted a wikipediocracy post to not mention ur insane brother who spends his time spamming reddit?
if im reading the block log right, Arthur Kerensas account blocked a dozen of ur accounts while making ur Tobias account a sysop and posting that u were on probation. but that since u were permanently banned only two of ur accounts have been blocked, both by other mods.
it only took u SEVEN YEARS to notice this obvious fact lol
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2018
Do y’all want a plagued tag? Cause this is how you get a plagued tag
Tobias_Reaper
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
You're complaining about doxing, when you've gone around the internet doxing my brother - whose name was only obtained by @Mikemikev who paid to obtain that information behind a paywall from an obscure electoral roll website.
Basically you're a lying hypocritical piece of shit.
- Joined
- May 18, 2019
this is an example of how rationalwikis Best Contributors™ are very rational and Definitely Not™ mentally ill SJWs and how when they get banned by their Comrades™ they are Very Chill™ about it
im sure u can purge the crap if its not funny enough
sorry to disappoint but im just here to laugh at ur petty disagreements with ur fellow SJWs
Michaeldsuarez
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2015
Actually, RationalWiki didn't ban Shouniaisha; instead, they covered it up. FuzzyCatPotato first renamed the account to "Aisha". And then "SecretAgentoftheMods" renamed the account to "Collingwood" because they despise how Vordrak was documenting RationalWiki's pedophile-tolerant behavior. Then finally, FuzzyCatPotato renamed the account to "Ukuphendukela".
The RationalWiki community was close to banning Ukuphendukela / Shouniaisha, but FuzzyCatPotato shut down the discussion in order to save Ukuphendukela from what he calls "lynching".
Instead of blocking the pedophile, they blocked me, the whisper-blower. I wrote about the incident at Encyclopedia Dramatica:
https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/index.php?title=RationalWiki&oldid=935912#Shouniaisha.27s_return_and_Michaeldsuarez.27s_ban
Vordrak and I helped expose RationalWiki as being filled with pedophile apologists.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
RationalWiki is a cesspit of hypocrites and I would not have sex with them.
Tobias_Reaper
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
I made this discussion:
RationalWiki:Saloon bar - RationalWiki
I went a little overboard to troll the paedophilia apologists there
I don't hold grudges. I'm banned from editing RationalWiki for that doxxing drama. I've already put forward my point of view of the thing; I doubt many people are interested and I won't waste more time with it.
Thread can continue now criticising RationalWiki as a cesspit.
WikipediocracyNut
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2019
Your lawsuit is not going anywhere as we have concluded at Wikipediaocracy
Is Abd Lomax still pretending to be innocent?
He disrupted Wikiversity for over seven years, the Wikimedia Foundation had every right to ban him, it is not libel to ban someone from a public server!
Wikiversity admin Michael Umbrecht wrote to Abd Lomax "We have received numerous legitimate complaints about your activity over a long period of time"
Michael Umbrecht wrote as the ban reason:
https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abd&diff=1795552&oldid=1795534
He also sent Joshua P. Schroeder harassing emails
'''Delete''' and ban [[User:Abd]] for harassing me in e-mails. Wikiversity should be ashamed of itself for continuing to let him abusively campaign here. I have asked the foundation for a ruling as well. [[User:ජපස|ජපස]] ([[User talk:ජපස|discuss]] • [[Special ontributions/ජපස|contribs]]) 22:53, 21 December 2017 (UTC) |
You realise it was Joshua P. Schroeder who got you globally banned Abd?
You doxxed his legally changed name on the Thunderbolts forum in 2017
Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - Joshua Schroeder on pseudoscience o…
archived 30 Nov 2017 02:36:09 UTC
You also attacked him on your blog
Joshua Schroeder on pseudoscience on Wikipedia – Cold Fusion Community
archived 2 Dec 2017 04:44:32 UTC
archive.is
After Joshua reported you, you quickly emailed the admins of the Thunderbolts forum to remove your above post and they removed it, but it was too late.
Wikipedia:Harassment - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Off-Wiki harassment is default ban, you will have to explain to the Foundation if this goes to court why you doxxed Joshua's new legally changed name and were stalking him.
Lomax your lawsuit is the biggest piece of turd I have seen. As Vigilant wrote to you, you will likely lose this case and have to pay a shit load of legal fees.
Lomax also brags about "being divorced seven times" as an accomplishment in life.
Abd Ul-Rahman Lomax - Encyclopedia Dramatica
encyclopediadramatica.rs
You clearly need help Abd, back-chatting Jones Day and posting the information of Christopher M. Morrison.
|
Jones Day will wipe the flaw with you. You will lose this case so badly. The Wikimedia Foundation have already given your countless bans, off-wiki harassment and twenty year internet history of trolling to Jones Day. They only need to see you are a net-kook with no honest reputation to defend.
|
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
In my personal opinion, RationalWiki is a perfect example of a website or online community that far outlived its initial purpose and the cultural zeitgeist that created it.
There's a reason why it became an SJW cesspit and I've discussed that reason at length before.
The worst part is that Conservapedia, it's longtime rival, is actually a little better about "Current Year" culture wars bullshit than RationalWiki for several reasons.
Part of it is because Conservapedia was always intended as a politicized propaganda wiki and never had any intent of either satire or debunking known frauds like RationalWiki originally did.
Honestly, it's a well-known open secret that Conservapedia is near-exclusively staffed by Andrew Schafly and a few deep-cover trolls who have been at it for so long that they may be buying their own grift at this point.
The other part of it is that because of the Conservapedia admin situation, it's still largely true to it's original Bush-era rhetoric of Evangelical Christianity mixed with Karl Rove's style of Neoconservative politics.
Contrast this to RationalWiki, who hopped on the SJW bandwagon fairly quickly and blatantly.
RationalWiki basically is a public example of the American Left's descent into moral guardian lunacy in the 2010's after being the paragons of free speech and free expression for most of the 1990's and 2000's
Conservapedia on the other hand is still a well-preserved relic of the 2000's American Right.
They're still big on the old right-wing mainstays of 'Murica, Jesus, Freedom Fries, The War On Terror, Bill O'Reilly, and Israel being America's geopolitical waifu/BFF.
I honestly don't see Conservapedia adopting the 2010's right-wing paradigms of cartoon frogs, Ben Shapiro, meme magic, Proud Boys, Serbian polka music, red pills, and clown worlds unless Andrew Schafly dies and and a new breed of trolls from the chans decide to move in and displace any remaining deep-cover trolls.
Like I said, RationalWiki (or possibly SJW Wiki if it gains traction) will likely go even further off the deep end and wind up as the leftist Metapedia if Trump wins in 2020 while Conservapedia is far more likely to remain a time capsule of the 2000's no matter who wins next year's election.
There's a reason why it became an SJW cesspit and I've discussed that reason at length before.
The worst part is that Conservapedia, it's longtime rival, is actually a little better about "Current Year" culture wars bullshit than RationalWiki for several reasons.
Part of it is because Conservapedia was always intended as a politicized propaganda wiki and never had any intent of either satire or debunking known frauds like RationalWiki originally did.
Honestly, it's a well-known open secret that Conservapedia is near-exclusively staffed by Andrew Schafly and a few deep-cover trolls who have been at it for so long that they may be buying their own grift at this point.
The other part of it is that because of the Conservapedia admin situation, it's still largely true to it's original Bush-era rhetoric of Evangelical Christianity mixed with Karl Rove's style of Neoconservative politics.
Contrast this to RationalWiki, who hopped on the SJW bandwagon fairly quickly and blatantly.
RationalWiki basically is a public example of the American Left's descent into moral guardian lunacy in the 2010's after being the paragons of free speech and free expression for most of the 1990's and 2000's
Conservapedia on the other hand is still a well-preserved relic of the 2000's American Right.
They're still big on the old right-wing mainstays of 'Murica, Jesus, Freedom Fries, The War On Terror, Bill O'Reilly, and Israel being America's geopolitical waifu/BFF.
I honestly don't see Conservapedia adopting the 2010's right-wing paradigms of cartoon frogs, Ben Shapiro, meme magic, Proud Boys, Serbian polka music, red pills, and clown worlds unless Andrew Schafly dies and and a new breed of trolls from the chans decide to move in and displace any remaining deep-cover trolls.
Like I said, RationalWiki (or possibly SJW Wiki if it gains traction) will likely go even further off the deep end and wind up as the leftist Metapedia if Trump wins in 2020 while Conservapedia is far more likely to remain a time capsule of the 2000's no matter who wins next year's election.
- Joined
- May 18, 2019
rationalwiki started as an outrageous troll site for peeps angry with conservapedia but it has partly turned into an outrageous troll site for peeps angry with metapedia
many older articles are hit pieces focused on making fun of conservapedia and creationists, then articles about some altmed quacks were added and popular for a while, now its all about racists, nazis, and politics
many of the original contributors to rationalwiki have gone now and newer peeps have newer interests. rationalwiki is less dependent on a small group of admins to control content as it elects new mods yearly and its founders have made no substantial edits for a long time
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
Angry speds from the site are indulging in their years long desire to get revenge for petty amounts of assache again.
So like the last few batches of wikispeds we had really.
A
AF 802
Guest
kiwifarms.net
How the hell does this not have a Plagued tag yet? Looks like this shit's been going on for over a week or more.
I'll never get why Wiki spergs treat editing a wiki more seriously than a 4chan janitor would take moderating an imageboard.
I'll never get why Wiki spergs treat editing a wiki more seriously than a 4chan janitor would take moderating an imageboard.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
IIRC, RationalWiki does have a few articles criticizing far-left ideas and activists under the banner of "moonbattery", but these criticisms are rather limp-wristed compared to the fiery condemnations of right-wingers and mostly boil down to whining about how they make "sane" left-wingers look bad.
If the current trend continues, it's quite likely that those articles will be rewritten to be more positive.
Tobias_Reaper
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
I wrote the article criticising the idea genes are involved in group differences in IQ.
SJWs changed the article to deny genes are even involved in individual differences in IQ - which is not only a false and unscientific position, but absurd and goes completely against scientific consensus.
When these SJWs vandalised my article (or a parody of an SJW, I couldn't tell, Poe's law...), I criticised them here:
rationalwiki.org
I got their edits reverted. However now I'm banned it will probably go back to the blank-slate SJW pseudoscience for individuals.
The problem with above is why RationalWiki is widely dismissed as a "liberal creationist" site now.
SJWs changed the article to deny genes are even involved in individual differences in IQ - which is not only a false and unscientific position, but absurd and goes completely against scientific consensus.
When these SJWs vandalised my article (or a parody of an SJW, I couldn't tell, Poe's law...), I criticised them here:
Talk:Hereditarianism - RationalWiki
I got their edits reverted. However now I'm banned it will probably go back to the blank-slate SJW pseudoscience for individuals.
The problem with above is why RationalWiki is widely dismissed as a "liberal creationist" site now.
Pedophile Michael Coombs
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 18, 2019
So you seriously believe Australian Aborigines have the same genetic intelligence as the Japanese? Why?
Abd
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2019
I'll answer this argument, which is rooted in racist assumptions. First of all, "same" is a red herring. As well, the meaning of "genetic intelligence" is not well-defined. But let's posit that there is *some* variation in something called intelligence, which would reflect an ability to analyze the environment and successfully predict the behavior of nature and others. The environment in Australia is different from the environment in Japan. Over time, then, human genetics will adapt to the environment, evolving what is generally better suited for it. General intelligence, if it is beneficial, will be beneficial both in Japan and in Australia. The populations have been separated for a long time, enough time for minor variations to develop. By some measure, we would expect a test of intelligence to show some difference, but what difference is shown may vary greatly with the test!
Mikemikev often straw-mans the environmentalist argument by making it absolute, i.e., into a claim that there is *no difference* in intelligence due to genetics.
Rather, the scientific question is whether or not there is a measurable difference, and, as well, how to measure it, and then the political issue is how such findings should influence personal behavior and public policy.
Given the conditions, I would not expect a large difference in group intelligence, but possibly a small one, again keeping in mind that any test of intelligence may be biased. Further, as to public policy, individual variations will swamp group variation, i.e., no individual should be discriminated against based on race, but rather individuals may be assessed based on individual abilities. It would be stupid to choose a Japanese idiot for a job requiring intelligence, over an aboriginal genius.
Mikemikev simply assumes a huge difference in an attempt to ridicule Oliver Smith's statement, but it is only ridiculous from a racist point of view. Mikemikev's racism is certainly not scientific.
Oliver Smith dominated RatWiki for years on racism issues, even though he disliked RatWiki overall, which is easy to understand! He went far overboard in attacking intelligence researchers, creating massive disruption, damaging academic freedom. I criticized that, but certainly was not thereby defending racism, which is an old way of thinking whose time has passed, and the shift occurred mostly in my lifetime. When I was a teen, racism was open and unapologetic. Now, it is the province of a lunatic fringe, even though more subtle forms of racism are endemic, and Mike was attempting to appeal to one of those.
Mikemikev often straw-mans the environmentalist argument by making it absolute, i.e., into a claim that there is *no difference* in intelligence due to genetics.
Rather, the scientific question is whether or not there is a measurable difference, and, as well, how to measure it, and then the political issue is how such findings should influence personal behavior and public policy.
Given the conditions, I would not expect a large difference in group intelligence, but possibly a small one, again keeping in mind that any test of intelligence may be biased. Further, as to public policy, individual variations will swamp group variation, i.e., no individual should be discriminated against based on race, but rather individuals may be assessed based on individual abilities. It would be stupid to choose a Japanese idiot for a job requiring intelligence, over an aboriginal genius.
Mikemikev simply assumes a huge difference in an attempt to ridicule Oliver Smith's statement, but it is only ridiculous from a racist point of view. Mikemikev's racism is certainly not scientific.
Oliver Smith dominated RatWiki for years on racism issues, even though he disliked RatWiki overall, which is easy to understand! He went far overboard in attacking intelligence researchers, creating massive disruption, damaging academic freedom. I criticized that, but certainly was not thereby defending racism, which is an old way of thinking whose time has passed, and the shift occurred mostly in my lifetime. When I was a teen, racism was open and unapologetic. Now, it is the province of a lunatic fringe, even though more subtle forms of racism are endemic, and Mike was attempting to appeal to one of those.
Last edited: