reddit General

Or let's get rid of Wolfgang because that's an offensive Russian caricature (or because he's Russian period, and we need to show solidarity with those poor Ukies?)
We're basically at that point now. You're straight up just not allowed to be Russian in a game or a TV show because the Ukrainians want their ethnicity to disappear and all mentions of their culture to be censored. Totally not Nazis though, just so we're clear.
 
325367869_182850531012621_1795373489305522153_n.jpg
 
And let me guess, the MAID jokes were all [REMOVED]?
There were a lot of jokes on mainstream subreddits about that one. But by now I suppose Reddit has forgotten about it.
We're basically at that point now. You're straight up just not allowed to be Russian in a game or a TV show because the Ukrainians want their ethnicity to disappear and all mentions of their culture to be censored. Totally not Nazis though, just so we're clear.
The Ukrainians don't even care (as long as it doesn't affect their weapons supply). Just like how no Mexicans were actually offended by Speedy Gonzales. This is just terminally online idiots getting offended on people's behalf.
 
Kotaku in Action is currently getting brigaded by like 3 different subs.

To the shock of no one, it's pissed off liberals getting mad about gamers again.
KiA would be a decent sub if it wasn't for the rampant pedophile infestation. For some reason they decided to go all in on defending child porn and have been doing so for a while.

LIke jesus christ, that thread is kia-ers getting assmad some visual novel or w/e has the underage romance options removed for the western release.

Bro, I don't care if she's 8000 years old in the lore, pick a different hill to die on, jesus.
 
Peado reddit admins remove a top thread discussing that townhall article about the two blokes who nonced out their adopted children

They are clearly just fact checking this story. Just be patient and wait the 2 years for the msm to confirm if it actually happened or not.
 
KiA would be a decent sub if it wasn't for the rampant pedophile infestation. For some reason they decided to go all in on defending child porn and have been doing so for a while.

LIke jesus christ, that thread is kia-ers getting assmad some visual novel or w/e has the underage romance options removed for the western release.

Bro, I don't care if she's 8000 years old in the lore, pick a different hill to die on, jesus.
Those aren't children though. They're drawings. Save some of this righteous fury for actual child abuse and not creepy men getting off to anime games.
 

To add on to this comment by based King Chiobu, I have once again infiltrated an antiwork talk. I used a reddit account donated by an antiwork user as well as voice changing software to disguise myself.

My schtick this time was that I was an autistic man being bullied by my coworkers on discord - basically quoting what they said to Merari in these discord leaks. They offered such advice as "wow, those people sound like real dipshits" and all admitted to being autistic lmao

Full video of my most recent infiltration here: https://youtube.com/v/5nGtzyLcSlo

I mentioned it in the other thread, but the one "shutting it down" is believed to be Merari01. Remember how he denied being Joost E Eggelaar of Eindhaven, Netherlands after he got doxxed?

Go back and listen. That accent sounds pretty fucking Dutch to me.

Merari was the guy I was talking to in the "shut it down" video. I messaged him after asking wtf that was and he said it was another moderator over discord voice chat. Personally, I believe it was a federal handler based off the cold, detached tone.
 
Tell me you have never met a libertarian without telling me. View attachment 4293016
Notice how a crummy news article is linked to instead of the actual study. Few read the links and this method leads to unproductive discussion even when they do. Do Redditors actually think that scientific articles need to be mediated by journos?

Everyone here guessed correctly though, it's false equivalence:

Libertarianism enshrines individual autonomy as its central political principle, but it has been criticized for applying this principle selectively. Reproductive decisions can stress the concept of individual autonomy by placing into conflict the claimed rights of each biological parent to choose. Two studies (N1 = 296; N2 = 580) show that among U.S. participants, libertarianism is associated with opposition to women's reproductive autonomy and support for men's. Libertarianism was associated with opposition to abortion rights and support for men's right both to prevent women from having abortions (male veto) and to withdraw financial support for a child when women refuse to terminate the pregnancy (financial abortion). Adjusting for the association between libertarianism and conservatism, only the relationship with opposition to abortion rights was rendered nonsignificant. Mediation analyses suggest that hostile sexism may account for libertarians' selective support for men's and not women's reproductive autonomy.
 
Notice how a crummy news article is linked to instead of the actual study. Few read the links and this method leads to unproductive discussion even when they do. Do Redditors actually think that scientific articles need to be mediated by journos?

Everyone here guessed correctly though, it's false equivalence:
As usual, ignoring the libertarian argument that the baby is a human individual who has a right to not be fucking murdered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lady Rackets Ass
Back