- Joined
- Nov 26, 2018
And nothing of value would be lost.
reddit General
- Thread starter SpessCaptain
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
These kinds of threads really show the weakness of the redditard's secular humanism. It tries to cling to European Christianity's moral framework (because everyone recognizes that it means something), but when pressed for justification for those moral values and duties all it can say is "well, uhh, we like them?"
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
This is the problem with humanism. It boils down to something like this:
"We should judge all humans by a moral code which we totally didn't steal from the Christians. Also, there is no God and your actions only affect the here and now, because there is no afterlife."
"If my actions don't have any bearing on what happens after I die, then why shouldn't I steal that car I've had my eye on?"
"Well... just don't, okay? Now if you'll excuse me I have to go and practice tipping my fedora. I'm going to perform at the atheist convention, you know."
Either humans, by and large, have a moral code written into their conscience (this is what we call the "natural law" in Christianity) and there's an author of that moral code (God), in which case it makes sense for us to follow that moral code in order to be rewarded by its Author. Or humans don't have that moral code, in which case I have to wonder why I'm sitting in a house in a city and not running around a field with my mates looking to find another tribe so that I can rape their women and burn their village down. You can't say that we wrote that code ourselves, because you can find it in every society there is, from the Yorubas to ancient Rome. Either we somehow came up with seven of the Ten Commandments when we were, so to speak, raping and burning each other, or they were given to us by our Creator. You can't have it both ways.
"We should judge all humans by a moral code which we totally didn't steal from the Christians. Also, there is no God and your actions only affect the here and now, because there is no afterlife."
"If my actions don't have any bearing on what happens after I die, then why shouldn't I steal that car I've had my eye on?"
"Well... just don't, okay? Now if you'll excuse me I have to go and practice tipping my fedora. I'm going to perform at the atheist convention, you know."
Either humans, by and large, have a moral code written into their conscience (this is what we call the "natural law" in Christianity) and there's an author of that moral code (God), in which case it makes sense for us to follow that moral code in order to be rewarded by its Author. Or humans don't have that moral code, in which case I have to wonder why I'm sitting in a house in a city and not running around a field with my mates looking to find another tribe so that I can rape their women and burn their village down. You can't say that we wrote that code ourselves, because you can find it in every society there is, from the Yorubas to ancient Rome. Either we somehow came up with seven of the Ten Commandments when we were, so to speak, raping and burning each other, or they were given to us by our Creator. You can't have it both ways.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
These Redditors sound like the type of people who would never understand the reasoning behind Charles Branson’s character from the Death Wish series.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2017
>Stalin
>Kim Jong Un
>Right Wing
Lmao cope, when leftoid dictators genocide millions of people leftoids always go THAT DIDNT COUNT or MUH CIA.
(Yes I did retype this comment after the rollback)
Jimjamflimflam
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2020
Its amazing how they will quote that "moral arc of the universe bends to justice" line and condemn the people of culture past because "hey should have known better"
But once fucking kids is on the table its all "Well maybe its all cultural and we should rush to judge"
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
Everything is barbarian culture unless they like it. It's slimy that moral relativists don't take their personal morals seriously just because someone with a different skin tone may have different beliefs. It feels more like a way to get away with shit than any sort of intellectual understanding.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
r/TwoXChromosomes are currently losing their minds about Afghanistan. Front page right now:
All the comments basically boil down to "this is so sad, women most affected, this is why American needs to import millions of brown people."
All the comments basically boil down to "this is so sad, women most affected, this is why American needs to import millions of brown people."
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2020
I know these are actual women posting in the tranny-occupied subreddit because trannies don't care about actual women. So, what if these women actually prefer Sharia over allowing faggots to roam free and their entire country being dominated by consumer garbage? It's clear that the American way will just devour the soul of people eventually so why would they want to emulate that, especially since we have clear results of this kind of culture's evolution?
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2020
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
Man that fish is going hard, rarely met a girl with that much enthusiasm and vigor.
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2019
To paraphrase the Don of Arby’s:
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2016
Man that dolphin vid is something else
Ragnarlodbrok
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2021
Afghanistan coverage has been shit on reddit except this really based post:
Civilization can't be handed to a people its something that naturally has to grow.
Civilization can't be handed to a people its something that naturally has to grow.
What is the point? If you get all of those people to the west all they are gonna do is setup a mini middle east in whatever country they get too.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
As I understand it's working great for the French and the English.