RPGnet Forums

I would rather put my worldbuilding attempts here on the Farms than at RPGnet.

I'd at least know (a) I'm not going to get faggot mods up in my face for 'problematic' elements, (b) if I get trolled it might be funny, and (c) some of the folks in those threads are pretty sharp and can give good input.
You've left out the part where you won't get banned for criticism.
 
"Loli" is now a banned word.
Screenshot_20210705-102446_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20210705-102520_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20210705-102543_Chrome.jpg


Screenshot_20210705-101253_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20210705-101326_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20210705-101336_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20210705-101842_Chrome.jpg

Why is it always the anarchists who have the stupidest possible opinions?
 
If they wanted to see how democracy works in the Third World, just look at how South Africa flips the tables on Whitey...While still not accomplishing much of anything.

Or take a course in the Mandela School of Economics.

Banned by a retard mod who probably didn't read the thread. These feel kind of random, at this point.

@Hugbox Kommissar that change in policy was caused by a troll. Of course, the mods took the bait, but neglected to post something like this.


Zeroed in for crossing the wrong lines and using a specific word.

@Jaimas you're going to cry yourself to sleep at this one.

And I checked the ancap RPG industries thread and the users still don't understand what hypocrisy is.
 
Last edited:
"Loli" is now a banned word.
View attachment 2318586View attachment 2318591View attachment 2318592

View attachment 2318597
View attachment 2318599
View attachment 2318600
View attachment 2318613
Why is it always the anarchists who have the stupidest possible opinions?
That last one makes my eyes cross. Please, oh great Roseblack, tell us of these nonwhite bastions of human rights and democracy?

I'll be waiting here with baited breath. I won't be holding it, though.

Stupid faggot.
 
That last one makes my eyes cross. Please, oh great Roseblack, tell us of these nonwhite bastions of human rights and democracy?

I'll be waiting here with baited breath. I won't be holding it, though.

Stupid faggot.
I love the logic: "Well they WOULD have gotten around to universal rights if those nasty barbarians [readas: white people] weren't running around killing them and taking their stuff."

Like bitch, let me introduce you to a little guy known as Genghis Kahn and what he did to white people...

These people really believe whites were in some kind edenic bubble, never bothered by nobody, don't they? (never mind all the attacking and killing each other)

Also yeah, no shit - when the general paradigm of Christianity which is the soil from which universal rights grew - is chased out of its ancestral lands by... oh right, MUSLIMS and remains chiefly in Europe, then of course Europe is going to be the one to cook up the new idea. Maybe if you had let the faith spread around to other cultures, they might have developed their own styling of universal rights from it.
 
I love the logic: "Well they WOULD have gotten around to universal rights if those nasty barbarians [readas: white people] weren't running around killing them and taking their stuff."

Like bitch, let me introduce you to a little guy known as Genghis Kahn and what he did to white people...

These people really believe whites were in some kind edenic bubble, never bothered by nobody, don't they? (never mind all the attacking and killing each other)

Also yeah, no shit - when the general paradigm of Christianity which is the soil from which universal rights grew - is chased out of its ancestral lands by... oh right, MUSLIMS and remains chiefly in Europe, then of course Europe is going to be the one to cook up the new idea. Maybe if you had let the faith spread around to other cultures, they might have developed their own styling of universal rights from it.
Honestly, if universal rights was a thing that happened on it's own; there wouldn't be a case of Somalia repeatedly breaking down due to infighting. Everyone would have some form of firearms. The Rape of Nanking (I know that I'm probably spelling this wrong) have been caused by the Japanese expanding into China. China wouldn't have turned into a dystopian socialist regime. The Muslims wouldn't be killing each other over how to worship Allah. Kuwait wouldn't have been invaded by Hussein. And Israel wouldn't need the Iron
Dome.

Think about it, not everyone has the access to the same type of resources (and intelligence).
 
At last trad-prudes are generally coherent in their principles.
Ha, i fucking wish. All their leadership are closet homosexuals, pedophiles, etc. Theyre happy to get their *own* kid a quiet abortion. Most of them are massive porn addicts.

No, trad-prudes are masters of projection - their principles are coherent, but virtually none of them follow them.
 
Is it weird that it took them this long to do it? "Ooh the no-no word is giving our facewatchers a singleplus ungood bellyfeel" so they finally decided to ban it.
Considering a lot of them are probably sex perverts themselves, I'm surprised they banned it at all. Except maybe that forcing people to use other words makes them less likely to out themselves and cause a scandal.
 
Ha, i fucking wish. All their leadership are closet homosexuals, pedophiles, etc. Theyre happy to get their *own* kid a quiet abortion. Most of them are massive porn addicts.

No, trad-prudes are masters of projection - their principles are coherent, but virtually none of them follow them.
> All their leadership are closet homosexuals, pedophiles, etc
What "leadership?" Any actual traditionalist leaders haven't had one iota of power since 1945.
>They're happy to get their *own* kid a quiet abortion
Even subscribers to boomer traditionalism wouldn't do this "happily."
>their principles are coherent, but virtually none of them follow them
None of them, nor actual traditionalists do. Literally zero in fact, because it's impossible to actually perfectly follow even very lax moral codes perfectly. This simple fact is one of the reasons why moral codes keep getting degraded down to the point at which pedophilia and bestiality are within the strike zone for normalization. When one breaks a moral principle and then is confronted with having to maintain the moral code, they're presented with two binary options. They can either

A: face their own sins and live with the fact that they're a hypocrite but still uphold the code or
B: attempt to expunge that moral principle from the moral code in order to at least in their minds and the public's minds' absolve themselves of their sins

Half of modern society is so obsessed with hypocrisy as a moral principle (which it is don't get me wrong) that they can be danced around like a marionette by it. The other half simply doesn't give a shit and laughs at the former half when it calls them on their hypocrisy. Imagine if we conducted the law with this same kind of mindset. A cop who shoplifted when he was 8 now can't arrest any shoplifters? A judge (21 at the time) who banged a 16yo while drunk at a frat party now has to dismiss every pedophilia case?
 
I am late and gay coming to this party but I gotta say, RPGnet is a far cry from what it was in the early 2000s. I haven't been on that site in a hot minute and I go back to see it heavily polluted with shrieking wokescolds and faggots.

The jannies on that site are high off the power trips. Or miserable.
 
His mistake was being on the site in the first place. It's not worth it swimming through the garbage and talking to rats.
It's like swimming in a sewer and complaining it's full of shit. Find an actual swimming pool. This site is a psycho forum at best, and actually isn't even a forum, because you can actually talk about shit in a forum.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jagraveen
Back