- Joined
- Jul 22, 2017
Centralized platforms are killing the free internet. I'm talking about your Facebooks, Twitters, Reddits, YouTubes. These giant websites that dominate internet traffic have become arbiters of culture, of discussion and who gets a voice.
Making alternatives can be helpful, but the fragmentation of the userbase is problematic. If an alternative becomes dominant, the same type of crackdowns will begin occurring all over again. Reminder that once upon a time Reddit was the new Digg, and Facebook was the new MySpace.
What did we gain from these platforms? We gained wider reach, a large userbase that will regularly log into the website and possibly see your content, and expensive video streaming infrastructure. We give up our freedom in exchange.
The internet would become a freer place if we could revert back to the world of many small and medium sized websites. Where there is no truly dominate platform, or rather, the internet and not the website is the platform.
Can you honestly ask someone to visit your WordPress blog in [CURRENT YEAR]? Maybe, but they'll likely forget about it never come back. It's not part of the users routine to visit your website, especially if your website only updates once a week or even once a month. But we solved in this problem, in 2002 with the popularization of RSS 2.0.
So what happened? Why is RSS a boomer technology and not the way everyone consumes their content? I suspect publishers did everything in their power to kill it. Google (the advertising company) killed Google Reader. Publishers started removing content from their feeds, leaving only a summary, forcing you to click through to their site. Mozilla Firefox (which pushed RSS heavily in the early 2000s) have dropped almost all their RSS support in favor of turning their browser into botnet adware. Fundamentally RSS makes monetization difficult because it allows people to consume content offline at their convenience and without a browser.
Despite the shortcomings of RSS I strongly advocate for everyone to start using RSS. Bypass the middle-man that is Facebook or Twitter and get your content directly from the content source. Don't allow the algorithms to play favorites with the content you want.
Optimally we'd take this even further with technologies like IPFS, but I can only dream. Right now RSS should be convenient and universal enough for everyone to start using.
Now only if KiwiFarms displayed most recent post instead of the OP every time.
Linux: Liferea (Open Source)
Android: Feeder (Open Source, available on F-Droid)
Web (Self-Hosted): Miniflux (Open Source)
Web (Self-Hosted): Tiny Tiny RSS (Open Source)
Web: Feedly (Proprietary)
Windows: RSSOwlnix (Open Source)
iOS/MacOS: macfags aren't actually people so I don't care enough to put anything here
Making alternatives can be helpful, but the fragmentation of the userbase is problematic. If an alternative becomes dominant, the same type of crackdowns will begin occurring all over again. Reminder that once upon a time Reddit was the new Digg, and Facebook was the new MySpace.
What did we gain from these platforms? We gained wider reach, a large userbase that will regularly log into the website and possibly see your content, and expensive video streaming infrastructure. We give up our freedom in exchange.
The internet would become a freer place if we could revert back to the world of many small and medium sized websites. Where there is no truly dominate platform, or rather, the internet and not the website is the platform.
Can you honestly ask someone to visit your WordPress blog in [CURRENT YEAR]? Maybe, but they'll likely forget about it never come back. It's not part of the users routine to visit your website, especially if your website only updates once a week or even once a month. But we solved in this problem, in 2002 with the popularization of RSS 2.0.
So what happened? Why is RSS a boomer technology and not the way everyone consumes their content? I suspect publishers did everything in their power to kill it. Google (the advertising company) killed Google Reader. Publishers started removing content from their feeds, leaving only a summary, forcing you to click through to their site. Mozilla Firefox (which pushed RSS heavily in the early 2000s) have dropped almost all their RSS support in favor of turning their browser into botnet adware. Fundamentally RSS makes monetization difficult because it allows people to consume content offline at their convenience and without a browser.
Despite the shortcomings of RSS I strongly advocate for everyone to start using RSS. Bypass the middle-man that is Facebook or Twitter and get your content directly from the content source. Don't allow the algorithms to play favorites with the content you want.
Optimally we'd take this even further with technologies like IPFS, but I can only dream. Right now RSS should be convenient and universal enough for everyone to start using.
Now only if KiwiFarms displayed most recent post instead of the OP every time.
Linux: Liferea (Open Source)
Android: Feeder (Open Source, available on F-Droid)
Web (Self-Hosted): Miniflux (Open Source)
Web (Self-Hosted): Tiny Tiny RSS (Open Source)
Web: Feedly (Proprietary)
Windows: RSSOwlnix (Open Source)
iOS/MacOS: macfags aren't actually people so I don't care enough to put anything here
this post was partly inspired by this Luke Smith video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYDwep9yI8A
Last edited: