Should short people be prohibited from reproducing?

Meat Target

We ridicule you because you're ridiculous
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
I'm 6'2", coming from tall stock on both MeatMom and MeatDad's sides. The thought of my offspring being smaller than amazon mommies or proto-Space Marines horrifies me.

Who do diminutive, sub-6' homunculi think they are, to insist that they are the equals of the vertically proficient? Next they'll be demanding that Russell Greer and Chance Wilkins have an unalienable right to procreate.

Get in your place, squats. You are hindering the evolution of our species.
 
Last edited:
Well, height is a highly volatile and unpredictable condition. I, for example, am 4" taller than my dad, and one of my uncles is around 9" taller than his dad. On my mother's side, the shortest (female) sibling is 5" shorter than the tallest (female) sibling. So I don't think it is that easy to predict or judge a priori
 
Last edited:
The real question here is how do we ensure that short girls (hot) are protected while short guys (subhuman) go extinct, it seems you can't have one without the other, I think genetic engineering with CRISPR/cas9 will eventually solve this problem, but we'll need a temporary solution in the meantime.
 
Short kings will point and laugh from the afterlife when you gotta send your (very tall) children down the coal mines because they're the only ones left that'll fit.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: FrickleMyPickle
You'll have to get past Shaq first

shaq.jpg
 
Unfortunately, and I say this as a tall person (6'2")... short people are simply more efficient. You could almost pack twice as many people into the same mass as long as you do not prioritize height. While I watch shorties pull-up or push-up with so much more mechanical advantage, I am feeling massive joint pains trying to keep up pace. It is simply an anachronism to try and dino-size people when we have learned the benefits gained from focusing on economy.
 
Unfortunately, and I say this as a tall person (6'2")... short people are simply more efficient. You could almost pack twice as many people into the same mass as long as you do not prioritize height. While I watch shorties pull-up or push-up with so much more mechanical advantage, I am feeling massive joint pains trying to keep up pace. It is simply an anachronism to try and dino-size people when we have learned the benefits gained from focusing on economy.
Hello fellow tallgroids, aren't tall people just so much less efficient than short kings? Haha, I sure wish I was a 5'8" manlet, we they really are superior in every way, t-they can even do more pushups!
 
Only if it goes along with other things. No reason a 130+ IQ person who could cure cancer (or shortness) should be restricted from reproducing just because he's 5'5". If however, your family has a tendency to produce a lot of downies, criminals, people who need corrective lenses, etc., then they need to be excluded from the gene pool.
 
enjoy your heart failure

they're not sending anyone over 5'6" to live on mars
 
It's not going to happen judging by human behaviour. Across cultures women prefer tall men, but men also prefer women shorter than them.

You can't breed out lack of height when men across societies consistently make the choice to keep it in.

The struggle of the manlet is known, but the amazon too faces similar issues against tall men who prefer a smaller model.
 
The real question here is how do we ensure that short girls (hot) are protected while short guys (subhuman) go extinct, it seems you can't have one without the other, I think genetic engineering with CRISPR/cas9 will eventually solve this problem, but we'll need a temporary solution in the meantime.
Short girls are the reason short guys exist. The genes for height come from both parents, so protecting the short girls will still ensure short guys exist.
 
Back