Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sluthate needs their hero right now.
video-undefined-1E2AF26900000578-391_636x358.jpg
 
seriously
you want a hot girl?

be hot
failing that, be rich or popular.
ask older men with life experience, and you will hear nothing else.
You keep saying that rigid lines of thoughts are a sign of autism, but then you say things like this without a hint of irony. Attraction isn't that rigid. My ex, while not unattractive, wasn't anything like the underwear models you keep posting, nor was he particularly wealthy or popular, but we were still together for some 2 years.

Physical attractiveness is a factor for many girls and guys alike (saying that it's just a factor for girls is absolutely ridiculous by the way), but it's not as significant as you guys make it out to be. Not by a long shot. You seem to base your assumption of how long-term relationships are shaped based on things you see happening in discos and nightclubs when girls get picked up by charismatic handsome fellows for one night stands, but one night stands actually pretty much never turn into long-term relationships. Those require a lot more than physical attractiveness. As for one night stands themselves, I can't really judge how those work since I'm not interested in them.

Also, take it from a girl that the way in which sluthate measures physical attractiveness is profoundly autistic. Attractiveness cannot be measured in ratios and numbers. There's plenty of guys that look nothing like your picture of ideal masculinity that are considered among the most handsome people in the mainstream. I wouldn't trade the likes of Vic Fuentes or Ville Valo for all the Kelvin Klein models in the world. Physical attractiveness depends a lot on someone's charm, wit, style, attitude and countless other factors. Again, this is a point where you guys religiously worship the same rigidity that you criticize us for having.
 
Women don't like admitting they're not more "evolved" than men, even to themselves.
But actually, there are studies about this, not just sluthate's collection of anecdotes.
http://www.itworld.com/article/2721...earch-proves-just-how-shallow-women-are-.html
(it's a blog post, summarizing/linking the actual study)

You do realise that male and female evolved at generally the same rate but for billions of years males were non-existant? There was only asexual reproduction or mutual sharing (can someone correct me on this, not a SHer though)
XY chromosones are technically a mutation.
 
"Elliot Rrrrodger here. I'm speaking from bowels of Hell to tell you all that all of the money and status I had from my mommy and daddy, as well as my conventional good looks, could not overcome my repellant personality. So I killed a bunch of people and then myself because I was a spoiled crybaby.

Also, just a word to the wise: they don't have lattes down here. Ronald Reagan made me cry the other day, and I had to resort to throwing a cup of tepid water at him instead."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back